Comparisons of two methods of removing anthropogenically related variability from the near-surface observational temperature field

Assessments of the veracity of model-generated variability are difficult because variability in observed climate data during the 20th century is composed of natural and anthropogenic (greenhouse gas and sulfate aerosol) factors in addition to internal climate fluctuations. Comparisons should be improved if some of these factors could either be extracted from real world data or additions be made to model-generated variability. Both options involve several assumptions, the most important of which is that the climate system is linear to a first approximation. We discuss this and other assumptions and present results from two different methods of removing variability related to anthropogenic factors using energy balance models (EBMs) and atmosphere/ocean general circulation models (A/OGCMs). At a global scale, the pattern of the trend of surface temperature over the 1966–1995 period, after removing the anthropogenic effect, shows some strong similarities between the two methods, with the strongest residual warming evident over much of northern Asia and northern North America.

[1]  Keith R. Briffa,et al.  Estimating Sampling Errors in Large-Scale Temperature Averages , 1997 .

[2]  Syukuro Manabe,et al.  Interdecadal Variations of the Thermohaline Circulation in a Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model , 1993 .

[3]  Robert Sausen,et al.  On the cold start problem in transient simulations with coupled atmosphere-ocean models , 1992 .

[4]  K. Briffa,et al.  Global Surface Air Temperature Variations During the Twentieth Century: Part 1, Spatial, Temporal and Seasonal Details , 1992 .

[5]  J. Wallace,et al.  Dynamic Contribution to Hemispheric Mean Temperature Trends , 1995, Science.

[6]  T. Wigley,et al.  Global Sea-level Rise: Past and Future , 1996 .

[7]  K. Hasselmann,et al.  Detection of anthropogenic climate change using a fingerprint method , 1995 .

[8]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  On Surface Temperature, Greenhouse Gases, and Aerosols: Models and Observations , 1995 .

[9]  Robert Sausen,et al.  Simulation of the present-day climate with the ECHAM model: Impact of model physics and resolution , 1992 .

[10]  Michael E. Schlesinger,et al.  An oscillation in the global climate system of period 65–70 years , 1994, Nature.

[11]  S. Manabe,et al.  Transient response of a coupled model to estimated changes in greenhouse gas and sulfate concentrations , 1997 .

[12]  R. Voss,et al.  Multi-fingerprint detection and attribution analysis of greenhouse gas, greenhouse gas-plus-aerosol and solar forced climate change , 1997 .

[13]  R. Sausen,et al.  Periodically synchronously coupled integrations with the atmosphere-ocean general circulation model ECHAM3/LSG , 1998 .

[14]  David Parker,et al.  Interdecadal changes of surface temperature since the late nineteenth century , 1994 .

[15]  Y. Kushnir,et al.  Interdecadal Variations in North Atlantic Sea Surface Temperature and Associated Atmospheric Conditions , 1994 .

[16]  V. Ramaswamy,et al.  Linear additivity of climate response for combined albedo and greenhouse perturbations , 1997 .

[17]  T. Wigley,et al.  The observed global warming record: what does it tell us? , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  B. Santer,et al.  Detecting greenhouse-gas-induced climate change with an optimal fingerprint method , 1996 .

[19]  U. Cubasch,et al.  Simulation with an O-AGCM of the influence of variations of the solar constant on the global climate , 1996 .

[20]  U. Cubasch,et al.  Simulation of the influence of solar radiation variations on the global climate with an ocean-atmosphere general circulation model , 1997 .

[21]  Relative detectability of greenhouse-gas and aerosol climate change signals , 1998 .

[22]  J. Jouzel,et al.  Observed Climate Variability and Change, The IPCC Second Scientific Assessment , 1996 .

[23]  Wallace S. Broecker,et al.  Carbon uptake experiments with a zonally-averaged global ocean circulation model , 1994 .

[24]  Michael E. Mann,et al.  Global-scale modes of surface temperature variability on interannual to century timescales , 1994 .

[25]  T. Wigley,et al.  Implications for climate and sea level of revised IPCC emissions scenarios , 1992, Nature.

[26]  T. Stocker,et al.  A Zonally Averaged Ocean Model for the Thermohaline Circulation. Part II: Interocean Circulation in the Pacific-Atlantic Basin System , 1991 .

[27]  Tom M. L. Wigley,et al.  Towards the detection and attribution of an anthropogenic effect on climate , 1995 .

[28]  J. Lean,et al.  Reconstruction of solar irradiance since 1610: Implications for climate change , 1995 .

[29]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change : the IPCC scientific assessment , 1990 .

[30]  K. E. Taylor,et al.  Response of the climate system to atmospheric aerosols and greenhouse gases , 1994, Nature.

[31]  T. Barnett.  An Attempt to Detect the Greenhouse-Gas Signal in a Transient GCM Simulation , 1991 .

[32]  T. Wigley,et al.  Natural variability of the climate system and detection of the greenhouse effect , 1990, Nature.

[33]  Klaus Hasselmann,et al.  Mean Circulation of the Hamburg LSG OGCM and Its Sensitivity to the Thermohaline Surface Forcing , 1993 .

[34]  J. Penner,et al.  Quantifying and minimizing uncertainty of climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols , 1994 .

[35]  J. M. Gregory,et al.  Climate response to increasing levels of greenhouse gases and sulphate aerosols , 1995, Nature.

[36]  Robert Sausen,et al.  Time-dependent greenhouse warming computations with a coupled ocean-atmosphere model , 1992 .

[37]  H. Storch,et al.  Economic efficiency of CO2 reduction programs , 1994 .

[38]  Henning Rodhe,et al.  A global three-dimensional model of the tropospheric sulfur cycle , 1991 .