Grasping Ability and Motion Synergies in Affordable Tendon-Driven Prosthetic Hands Controlled by Able-Bodied Subjects

Affordable 3D-printed tendon-driven prosthetic hands are a rising trend because of their availability and easy customization. Nevertheless, comparative studies about the functionality of this kind of prostheses are lacking. The tradeoff between the number of actuators and the grasping ability of prosthetic hands is a relevant issue in their design. The analysis of synergies among fingers is a common method used to reduce dimensionality without any significant loss of dexterity. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the functionality and motion synergies of different tendon-driven hands using an able-bodied adaptor. The use of this adaptor to control the hands by means of the fingers of healthy subjects makes it possible to take advantage of the human brain control while obtaining the synergies directly from the artificial hand. Four artificial hands (IMMA, Limbitless, Dextrus v2.0, InMoov) were confronted with the Anthropomorphic Hand Assessment Protocol, quantifying functionality and human-like grasping. Three subjects performed the tests by means of a specially designed able-bodied adaptor that allows each tendon to be controlled by a different human finger. The tendon motions were registered, and correlation and principal component analyses were used to obtain the motion synergies. The grasping ability of the analyzed hands ranged between 48 and 57% with respect to that of the human hand, with the IMMA hand obtaining the highest score. The effect of the subject on the grasping ability score was found to be non-significant. For all the hands, the highest tendon-pair synergies were obtained for pairs of long fingers and were greater for adjacent fingers. The principal component analysis showed that, for all the hands, two principal components explained close to or more than 80% of the variance. Several factors, such as the friction coefficient of the hand contact surfaces, limitations on the underactuation, and impairments for a correct thumb opposition need to be improved in this type of prostheses to increase their grasping stability. The principal components obtained in this study provide useful information for the design of transmission or control systems to underactuate these hands.

[1]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult Norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test of Finger Dexterity , 1985 .

[2]  Matteo Bianchi,et al.  Hand synergies: Integration of robotics and neuroscience for understanding the control of biological and artificial hands. , 2016, Physics of life reviews.

[3]  Helen Y N Lindner,et al.  Upper Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures: Review and Content Comparison Based on International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health , 2010, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[4]  Khanjan Mehta,et al.  Characteristics of a 3D-printed prosthetic hand for use in developing countries , 2015, 2015 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC).

[5]  J. Sancho-Bru,et al.  An introductory study of common grasps used by adults during performance of activities of daily living. , 2014, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[6]  Nathan T. Kearns,et al.  Evaluation of Performance‐Based Outcome Measures for the Upper Limb: A Comprehensive Narrative Review , 2018, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[7]  Immaculada Llop-Harillo,et al.  Optimization of the Kinematic Chain of the Thumb for a Hand Prosthesis Based on the Kapandji Opposition Test , 2019 .

[8]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Postural Hand Synergies for Tool Use , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Danica Kragic,et al.  The GRASP Taxonomy of Human Grasp Types , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[10]  Siddhartha S. Srinivasa,et al.  Benchmarking in Manipulation Research: Using the Yale-CMU-Berkeley Object and Model Set , 2015, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[11]  Cosimo Della Santina,et al.  Preliminary results toward a naturally controlled multi-synergistic prosthetic hand , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[12]  Peter J Kyberd The influence of control format and hand design in single axis myoelectric hands: assessment of functionality of prosthetic hands using the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure , 2011, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[13]  Gionata Salvietti,et al.  Replicating Human Hand Synergies Onto Robotic Hands: A Review on Software and Hardware Strategies , 2018, Front. Neurorobot..

[14]  Margarita Vergara,et al.  Dorsal and palmar aspect dimensions of hand anthropometry for designing hand tools and protections , 2018 .

[15]  Gloria R. Gogola,et al.  Three-Dimensional Printing of Prosthetic Hands for Children. , 2016, The Journal of hand surgery.

[16]  Gerwin Smit,et al.  3D-printed upper limb prostheses: a review , 2017, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[17]  Khanjan Mehta,et al.  A review of current upper-limb prostheses for resource constrained settings , 2015, 2015 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC).

[18]  C. Sollerman,et al.  Sollerman hand function test. A standardised method and its use in tetraplegic patients. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[19]  Tamim Asfour,et al.  The Anthropomorphic Hand Assessment Protocol (AHAP) , 2019, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[20]  Javier Andres,et al.  Comparison of Grasping Performance of Tendon and Linkage Transmission Systems in an Electric-Powered Low-Cost Hand Prosthesis , 2019, Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics.

[21]  C. L. Ventola Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Current and Projected Uses. , 2014, P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management.

[22]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[23]  Tamim Asfour,et al.  The KIT Prosthetic Hand: Design and Control , 2018, 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[24]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  Design of Artificial Hands: A Review , 2014, The Human Hand as an Inspiration for Robot Hand Development.

[25]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Preliminary functional assessment of a multigrasp myoelectric prosthesis , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[26]  C. Light,et al.  Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: normative data, reliability, and validity. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[27]  Gerwin Smit,et al.  The Lightweight Delft Cylinder Hand: First Multi-Articulating Hand That Meets the Basic User Requirements , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[28]  Dawei Zhao,et al.  The Development on a New Biomechatronic Prosthetic Hand Based on Under-actuated Mechanism , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[29]  Øyvind Stavdahl,et al.  System training and assessment in simultaneous proportional myoelectric prosthesis control , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[30]  Kara S Tanaka,et al.  Advances in 3D-Printed Pediatric Prostheses for Upper Extremity Differences. , 2016, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  C. K. van der Sluis,et al.  Learning effects of repetitive administration of the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure in novice prosthetic users. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[32]  Hanneke Bouwsema,et al.  Changes in performance over time while learning to use a myoelectric prosthesis , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[33]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Adaptive synergies for the design and control of the Pisa/IIT SoftHand , 2014, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[34]  Immaculada Llop-Harillo,et al.  System for the experimental evaluation of anthropomorphic hands. Application to a new 3D-printed prosthetic hand prototype , 2017, International Biomechanics.

[35]  A. Kapandji Cotation clinique de l'opposition et de la contre-opposition du pouce , 1986 .

[36]  Aaron M. Dollar,et al.  Grasp Frequency and Usage in Daily Household and Machine Shop Tasks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[37]  Dick H. Plettenburg,et al.  Learning to use a body-powered prosthesis: changes in functionality and kinematics , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.