Biobjective planning of GEO debris removal mission with multiple servicing spacecrafts

Abstract The mission planning of GEO debris removal with multiple servicing spacecrafts (SScs) is studied in this paper. Specifically, the SScs are considered to be initially on the GEO belt, and they should rendezvous with debris of different orbital slots and different inclinations, remove them to the graveyard orbit and finally return to their initial locations. Three key problems should be resolved here: task assignment, mission sequence planning and transfer trajectory optimization for each SSc. The minimum-cost, two-impulse phasing maneuver is used for each rendezvous. The objective is to find a set of optimal planning schemes with minimum fuel cost and travel duration. Considering this mission as a hybrid optimal control problem, a mathematical model is proposed. A modified multi-objective particle swarm optimization is employed to address the model. Numerous examples are carried out to demonstrate the effectiveness of the model and solution method. In this paper, single-SSc and multiple-SSc scenarios with the same amount of fuel are compared. Numerous experiments indicate that for a definite GEO debris removal mission, that which alternative (single-SSc or multiple-SSc) is better (cost less fuel and consume less travel time) is determined by many factors. Although in some cases, multiple-SSc scenarios may perform worse than single-SSc scenarios, the extra costs are considered worth the gain in mission safety and robustness.

[1]  Alan B. Jenkin,et al.  Case Study of Upper Stage Disposal for Geosynchronous Debris Mitigation , 2002 .

[2]  Christian M. Chilan,et al.  Evolutionary principles applied to mission planning problems , 2007 .

[3]  L. Kerstein,et al.  ROGER - Robotic Geostationary Orbit Restorer , 2003 .

[4]  Shi Hu-Li,et al.  Beyong Life-Cycle Utilization of Geostationary Communication Satellites in End-of-Life , 2010 .

[5]  R. Jehn,et al.  The situation in the geostationary ring , 2005 .

[6]  Jing Yu,et al.  Optimal scheduling of GEO debris removing based on hybrid optimal control theory , 2014 .

[7]  K. Alfriend,et al.  Optimal Servicing of Geosynchronous Satellites , 2002 .

[8]  S. Flegel,et al.  Active debris removal of multiple priority targets , 2013 .

[9]  D. A. Smith,et al.  A mission to preserve the geostationary region , 2004 .

[10]  Guo-Jin Tang,et al.  Orbital rendezvous mission planning using mixed integer nonlinear programming , 2011 .

[11]  Nahum Melamed,et al.  Ground assisted rendezvous with geosynchronous satellites for the disposal of space debris by means of Earth-oriented tethers , 2009 .

[12]  Bruce A. Conway,et al.  Automated Mission Planning via Evolutionary Algorithms , 2012 .

[13]  Ya-zhong Luo,et al.  Hybrid Approach to Optimize a Rendezvous Phasing Strategy , 2007 .

[14]  Bruce A. Conway,et al.  Using genetic algorithms for the construction of a space mission automaton , 2009, 2009 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.

[15]  Donald J. Kessler,et al.  Analysis of orbital perturbations acting on objects in orbits near geosynchronous earth orbit , 1992 .

[16]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[17]  Daniele Mortari,et al.  Path optimization for Space Sweeper with Sling-Sat: A method of active space debris removal , 2013 .

[18]  Bruce A. Conway,et al.  Genetic algorithms applied to the solution of hybrid optimal control problems in astrodynamics , 2009, J. Glob. Optim..

[19]  I. Michael Ross.  Hybrid Optimal Control Framework for Mission Planning , 2005, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics.

[20]  M. N. Vrahatis,et al.  Particle swarm optimization method in multiobjective problems , 2002, SAC '02.

[21]  J. Morio,et al.  Biobjective planning of an active debris removal mission , 2013 .

[22]  D. F. Moorer,et al.  Geosynchronous Large Debris Reorbiter: Challenges and Prospects , 2012 .

[23]  Bruce A. Conway,et al.  Automated Design of Multiphase Space Missions Using Hybrid Optimal Control , 2009 .