Dual-energy CT for the characterization of urinary calculi: In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a low-dose scanning protocol

The efficiency and radiation dose of a low-dose dual-energy (DE) CT protocol for the evaluation of urinary calculus disease were evaluated. A low-dose dual-source DE-CT renal calculi protocol (140 kV, 46 mAs; 80 kV, 210 mAs) was derived from the single-energy (SE) CT protocol used in our institution for the detection of renal calculi (120 kV, 75 mAs). An Alderson-Rando phantom was equipped with thermoluminescence dosimeters and examined by CT with both protocols. The effective doses were calculated. Fifty-one patients with suspected or known urinary calculus disease underwent DE-CT. DE analysis was performed if calculi were detected using a dedicated software tool. Results were compared to chemical analysis after invasive calculus extraction. An effective dose of 3.43 mSv (male) and 5.30 mSv (female) was measured in the phantom for the DE protocol (vs. 3.17/4.57 mSv for the SE protocol). Urinary calculi were found in 34 patients; in 28 patients, calculi were removed and analyzed (23 patients with calcified calculi, three with uric acid calculi, one with 2,8-dihyxdroxyadenine-calculi, one patient with a mixed struvite calculus). DE analysis was able to distinguish between calcified and non-calcified calculi in all cases. In conclusion, dual-energy urinary calculus analysis is effective also with a low-dose protocol. The protocol tested in this study reliably identified calcified urinary calculi in vivo.

[1]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[2]  W. O'Fallon,et al.  Renal stone epidemiology: a 25-year study in Rochester, Minnesota. , 1979, Kidney international.

[3]  R. Zamenhof,et al.  Determination of the chemical composition of urinary calculi by computerized tomography. , 1983, The Journal of urology.

[4]  W. Huda,et al.  Estimation of mean organ doses in diagnostic radiology from Rando phantom measurements. , 1984, Health physics.

[5]  B. Saltzman,et al.  Accurate determination of chemical composition of urinary calculi by spiral computerized tomography. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[6]  N. Dalrymple,et al.  Hounsfield unit density in the determination of urinary stone composition. , 2001, Urology.

[7]  Robert C. Smith,et al.  Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  D. DeLong,et al.  Helical CT for nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis: comparison of conventional and reduced radiation-dose techniques. , 2003, Radiology.

[9]  J. Debatin,et al.  Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT. , 2003, Radiology.

[10]  C. McCollough,et al.  CT urography. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[11]  K. Madbouly,et al.  Determination of the chemical composition of urinary calculi by noncontrast spiral computerized tomography , 2005, Urological Research.

[12]  H. Özkardeş,et al.  Spiral computed tomography: role in determination of chemical compositions of pure and mixed urinary stones--an in vitro study. , 2004, Urology.

[13]  Bong Soo Kim,et al.  Low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography for the assessment of acute renal colic: prospective comparative study , 2005, Acta radiologica.

[14]  A. Evan,et al.  Kidney stone disease. , 2005, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[15]  Mannudeep K Kalra,et al.  Detection of urinary tract stones at low-radiation-dose CT with z-axis automatic tube current modulation: phantom and clinical studies. , 2005, Radiology.

[16]  A. C. Buck,et al.  2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. , 2007, European urology.

[17]  A. Saita,et al.  Stone Composition: Where Do We Stand? , 2007, Urologia Internationalis.

[18]  Molly E.W. Thiessen.  Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose CT Protocol in Patients With Clinically Suspected Renal Colic , 2007 .

[19]  M. Reiser,et al.  Dual Energy CT Characterization of Urinary Calculi: Initial In Vitro and Clinical Experience , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[20]  M. Reiser,et al.  Dual Energy CT Characterization of Urinary Calculi: Initial In Vitro and Clinical Experience , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[21]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Dual-energy computed tomography for the differentiation of uric acid stones: ex vivo performance evaluation , 2008, Urological Research.

[22]  J. Felblinger,et al.  Characterization of human renal stones with MDCT: advantage of dual energy and limitations due to respiratory motion. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.