Rank-biased precision for measurement of retrieval effectiveness
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] W. S. Cooper. Expected search length: A single measure of retrieval effectiveness based on the weak ordering action of retrieval systems , 1968 .
[2] William S. Cooper,et al. On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness , 1973, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[3] William M. Shaw,et al. On the foundation of evaluation , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[4] Jaana Kekäläinen,et al. Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques , 2002, TOIS.
[5] Emine Yilmaz,et al. A statistical method for system evaluation using incomplete judgments , 2006, SIGIR.
[6] Tetsuya Sakai. Ranking the NTCIR Systems Based on Multigrade Relevance , 2004, AIRS.
[7] Gerard Salton,et al. Research and Development in Information Retrieval , 1982, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
[8] W. M. Shaw. On the Foundation of Evaluation. , 1986 .
[9] Ian H. Witten,et al. Managing Gigabytes: Compressing and Indexing Documents and Images , 1999 .
[10] KekäläinenJaana. Binary and graded relevance in IR evaluations , 2005 .
[11] Ellen M. Voorhees,et al. Retrieval evaluation with incomplete information , 2004, SIGIR '04.
[12] MoffatAlistair,et al. Rank-biased precision for measurement of retrieval effectiveness , 2008 .
[13] Xiannong Meng,et al. On User-oriented Measurements of Effectiveness of Web Information Retrieval Systems , 2004, International Conference on Internet Computing.
[14] E. Michael Keen,et al. Presenting Results of Experimental Retrieval Comparisons , 1997, Inf. Process. Manag..
[15] Robert M. Losee. When information retrieval measures agree about the relative quality of document rankings , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[16] Emine Yilmaz,et al. A geometric interpretation of r-precision and its correlation with average precision , 2005, SIGIR '05.
[17] Louise T. Su. The Relevance of Recall and Precision in User Evaluation , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[18] Alistair Moffat,et al. Strategic system comparisons via targeted relevance judgments , 2007, SIGIR.
[19] Kartik Hosanagar. A utility theoretic approach to determining optimal wait times in distributed information retrieval , 2005, SIGIR '05.
[20] Louise T. Su. The Relevance of Recall and Precision in User Evaluation , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[21] Tetsuya Sakai,et al. Alternatives to Bpref , 2007, SIGIR.
[22] Alistair Moffat,et al. Score standardization for inter-collection comparison of retrieval systems , 2008, SIGIR '08.
[23] Gordon V. Cormack,et al. Statistical precision of information retrieval evaluation , 2006, SIGIR.
[24] Charles L. A. Clarke,et al. Reliable information retrieval evaluation with incomplete and biased judgements , 2007, SIGIR.
[25] James Allan,et al. Minimal test collections for retrieval evaluation , 2006, SIGIR.
[26] James Allan,et al. When will information retrieval be "good enough"? , 2005, SIGIR '05.
[27] Ellen M. Voorhees,et al. Retrieval System Evaluation , 2005 .
[28] Thorsten Joachims,et al. Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback , 2005, SIGIR '05.
[29] Stephen P. Harter,et al. Variations in Relevance Assessments and the Measurement of Retrieval Effectiveness , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[30] Peter Schäuble,et al. Determining the effectiveness of retrieval algorithms , 1991, Inf. Process. Manag..
[31] Donna K. Harman,et al. Overview of the Second Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-2) , 1994, HLT.
[32] Jochen R. Moehr,et al. Current Status of the Evaluation of Information Retrieval , 2003, Journal of Medical Systems.
[33] Stefano Mizzaro,et al. Measuring retrieval effectiveness: A new proposal and a first experimental validation , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[34] Ellen M. Voorhees,et al. The Philosophy of Information Retrieval Evaluation , 2001, CLEF.
[35] Ian H. Witten,et al. Managing gigabytes (2nd ed.): compressing and indexing documents and images , 1999 .
[36] R D Gillette,et al. Evaluation Evaluation , 2008, European Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
[37] Jaana Kekäläinen,et al. Binary and graded relevance in IR evaluations--Comparison of the effects on ranking of IR systems , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..
[38] Peter Ingwersen,et al. Measures of relative relevance and ranked half-life: performance indicators for interactive IR , 1998, SIGIR '98.
[39] Stefano Mizzaro,et al. Relevance: The Whole History , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[40] Stefano Mizzaro. Relevance: the whole history , 1997 .
[41] Vijay V. Raghavan,et al. A critical investigation of recall and precision as measures of retrieval system performance , 1989, TOIS.
[42] Justin Zobel,et al. How reliable are the results of large-scale information retrieval experiments? , 1998, SIGIR '98.
[43] Alexander Dekhtyar,et al. Information Retrieval , 2018, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
[44] Tefko Saracevic,et al. Evaluation of evaluation in information retrieval , 1995, SIGIR '95.
[45] Jean Tague-Sutcliffe,et al. The Pragmatics of Information Retrieval Experimentation Revisited , 1997, Inf. Process. Manag..
[46] Robert M. Losee. When information retrieval measures agree about the relative quality of document rankings , 2000 .
[47] Mark Sanderson,et al. Information retrieval system evaluation: effort, sensitivity, and reliability , 2005, SIGIR '05.