A simulation environment for ITER PCS development

Abstract A simulation environment known as the Plasma Control System Simulation Platform (PCSSP), specifically designed to support development of the ITER Plasma Control System (PCS), is currently under construction by an international team encompassing a cross-section of expertise in simulation and exception handling for plasma control. The proposed design addresses the challenging requirements of supporting the PCS design. This paper provides an overview of the PCSSP project and a discussion of some of the major features of its design. Plasma control for the ITER tokamak will be significantly more challenging than for existing fusion devices. An order of magnitude greater performance (e.g. [1] , [2] ) is needed for some types of control, which together with limited actuator authority, implies that optimized individual controllers and nonlinear saturation logic are required. At the same time, consequences of control failure are significantly more severe, which implies a conflicting requirement for robust control. It also implies a requirement for comprehensive and robust exception handling. Coordinated control of multiple competing objectives with significant interactions, together with many shared uses of actuators to control multiple variables, implies that highly integrated control logic and shared actuator management will be required. It remains a challenge for the integrated technologies to simultaneously address these multiple and often competing requirements to be demonstrated on existing fusion devices and adapted for ITER in time to support its operational schedule. We describe ways in which the PCSSP will help address these challenges to support design of both the ITER PCS itself and the algorithms that will be implemented therein, and at the same time greatly reduce the cost of that development. We summarize the current status of the PCSSP design task, including system requirements and preliminary design documents already delivered as well as features of the ongoing detailed architectural design. The methods being incorporated in the detailed design are based on prior experience with control simulation environments in fusion and on standard practices prevalent in development of control-intensive industrial product designs.

[1]  Gerhard Raupp,et al.  Event generation and simulation of exception handling with the ITER PCSSP , 2014 .

[2]  R. Albanese,et al.  XSC Tools: A Software Suite for Tokamak Plasma Shape Control Design and Validation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[3]  M. Ferrara,et al.  Alcasim simulation code for Alcator C-Mod , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[4]  J. A. Leuer,et al.  Development of ITER-relevant plasma control solutions at DIII-D , 2007 .

[5]  J. B. Lister,et al.  Actuator and diagnostic requirements of the ITER Plasma Control System , 2012 .

[6]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  Requirements for alignment of electron cyclotron current drive for neoclassical tearing mode stabilization in ITER , 2008 .

[7]  G. Ambrosino,et al.  Modeling tools for the ITER Central Interlock System , 2011 .

[8]  Massimiliano Mattei,et al.  Plasma Response Models for Current, Shape and Position Control in Jet , 2003 .

[9]  J. A. Leuer,et al.  Advances in integrated plasma control on DIII-D , 2007 .

[10]  W. Suttrop,et al.  Predictive simulation of tokamak discharge behaviour based on simple scalings , 2005 .

[11]  Gerhard Raupp,et al.  Control processes and machine protection on ASDEX Upgrade , 2007 .

[12]  Chris Mi,et al.  Modeling of Plug-In Series Hybrid Powertrain for USPS Carrier Route Vehicle , 2007 .

[13]  Carlos L. Castillo,et al.  Modeling and visualization of multiple autonomous heterogeneous vehicles , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.