On modeling creativity in legal reasoning
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Bipin Indurkhya,et al. Metaphor as change of representation : an arti ® cial intelligence perspective , 2003 .
[2] Penny Nii. The blackboard model of problem solving , 1986 .
[3] Paul Bratley,et al. A computational framework for dialectical reasoning , 1995, ICAIL '95.
[4] H. Penny Nii,et al. Blackboard systems: the blackboard model of problem solving and the evolution of blackboard architectures , 1995 .
[5] Edwina L. Rissland,et al. CABARET: Rule Interpretation in a Hybrid Architecture , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..
[6] Victor R. Lesser,et al. The Hearsay-II Speech-Understanding System: Integrating Knowledge to Resolve Uncertainty , 1980, CSUR.
[7] William Twining,et al. How to Do Things with Rules: A Primer of Interpretation , 1976 .
[8] Kevin D. Ashley. Modeling legal argument - reasoning with cases and hypotheticals , 1991, Artificial intelligence and legal reasoning.
[9] B. Indurkhya,et al. Metaphor and Cognition: An Interactionist Approach , 1993, CL.
[10] Paul Bratley,et al. Legal interpretation in expert systems , 1993, ICAIL '93.
[11] Douglas R. Hofstadter,et al. Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies , 1995 .
[12] H. Penny Nii,et al. Blackboard Systems, Part One: The Blackboard Model of Problem Solving and the Evolution of Blackboard Architectures , 1986, AI Mag..