Family Firms as Institutions: Cultural reproduction and status maintenance among multi-centenary shinise in Kyoto

Our study investigated how multi-centenary family firms in the area of Kyoto – collectively known as shinise – maintain a high social status in the community. Our analysis unpacks the socio-cultural practices through which the ongoing interaction among these actors re-enacts and reproduces the social order that ascribes shinise a distinct social standing in exchange for their continued commitment to practices and structures that help the community preserve its cultural integrity and collective identity. By doing so, our findings trace a connection between status maintenance and the expressive function that a category of firms performs within a community. At the same time, our study reveals a dark side of high status, by showing how their commitments lock shinise in a position of ‘benign entrapment’ that may impose sacrifices on family members and severe limitations to their personal freedom.

[1]  M. Bellandi,et al.  Resilience and the role of arts and culture-based activities in mature industrial districts , 2017, The Role of Art and Culture for Regional and Urban Resilience.

[2]  E. Laclau Imagined Communities , 2019, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Music and Culture.

[3]  Christi Lockwood “New” Luxury: Examining the Maintenance of Elite Status , 2017 .

[4]  R. Marshall Gender inequality and family formation in Japan , 2017 .

[5]  Jean‐Pascal Gond,et al.  Maintaining Moral Legitimacy Through Worlds and Words: An Explanation of Firms' Investment in Sustainability Certification , 2017 .

[6]  W. Dyer,et al.  Addressing the Elephant in the Room: Disentangling Family Heterogeneity to Advance Family Business Research , 2017 .

[7]  F. Capone,et al.  The transformation of the Prato industrial district: an organisational ecology analysis of the co-evolution of Italian and Chinese firms , 2017 .

[8]  Andreas Hack,et al.  Storytelling and cultural family value transmission: Value perception of stories in family firms , 2016 .

[9]  Giuseppe Delmestri,et al.  How Cinderella Became a Queen , 2016 .

[10]  Scott D. Graffin,et al.  Reputation and Status: Expanding the Role of Social Evaluations in Management Research , 2016 .

[11]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[12]  A. Calabrò,et al.  Does family involvement foster or hinder firm performance? The missing role of family-based branding strategies , 2015 .

[13]  A. Cirillo,et al.  Does family involvement foster IPO value? Empirical analysis on Italian stock market , 2015 .

[14]  Matthew S. Kraatz Institutions and Ideals: Philip Selznick's Legacy for Organizational Studies , 2015 .

[15]  Brayden G. King Organizational Actors, Character, and Selznick’s Theory of Organizations , 2015 .

[16]  T. Reay,et al.  How Family, Business, and Community Logics Shape Family Firm Behavior and “Rules of the Game” in an Organizational Field , 2015 .

[17]  Daniel Malter,et al.  On the Causality and Cause of Returns to Organizational Status , 2014 .

[18]  V. Mackie Birth registration and the right to have rights , 2014 .

[19]  V. Mackie Birth registration and the right to have rights: the changing family and unchanging Koseki , 2014 .

[20]  A. Sharkey,et al.  Categories and Organizational Status: The Role of Industry Status in the Response to Organizational Deviance1 , 2014, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  F. Castellucci,et al.  Status in Organization and Management Theory , 2014 .

[22]  Pierre Azoulay,et al.  Matthew: Effect or Fable? , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[23]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  History and the present: Institutional legacies in communities of organizations , 2014 .

[24]  Carmelo Cennamo,et al.  Preserving Socioemotional Wealth in Family Firms: Asset or Liability? The Moderating Role of Business Context , 2013 .

[25]  Josip Kotlar,et al.  Goal Setting in Family Firms: Goal Diversity, Social Interactions, and Collective Commitment to Family–Centered Goals , 2013 .

[26]  Chad Navis,et al.  Categories, Identities, and Cultural Classification: Moving Beyond a Model of Categorical Constraint , 2013 .

[27]  D. De Clerq,et al.  Conformity and Distinctiveness in a Global Institutional Framework: The Legitimation of Ontario Fine Wine , 2013 .

[28]  David L. Deephouse,et al.  Do Family Firms Have Better Reputations than Non‐Family Firms? An Integration of Socioemotional Wealth and Social Identity Theories , 2013 .

[29]  Tsedal B. Neeley,et al.  Language Matters: Status Loss and Achieved Status Distinctions in Global Organizations , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[30]  Torsten M. Pieper,et al.  Exploring the Effect of Distinct Family Firm Reputation on Consumers' Preferences , 2013 .

[31]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Values Work: A Process Study of the Emergence and Performance of Organizational Values Practices , 2013 .

[32]  Carmelo Cennamo,et al.  Socioemotional Wealth and Proactive Stakeholder Engagement: Why Family–Controlled Firms Care More about their Stakeholders , 2012 .

[33]  K. Eddleston,et al.  Article Commentary: Extending the Socioemotional Wealth Perspective: A Look at the Dark Side , 2012 .

[34]  Joel Podolny,et al.  Status: Insights from Organizational Sociology , 2012 .

[35]  Damon J. Phillips,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue: Bringing Status to the Table—Attaining, Maintaining, and Experiencing Status in Organizations and Markets , 2012 .

[36]  E. Hobsbawn The Invention of Tradition: Mass-Producing Traditions: Europe, 1870–1914 , 2012 .

[37]  J. Pearce,et al.  Rating Performance or Contesting Status: Evidence Against the Homophily Explanation for Supervisor Demographic Skew in Performance Ratings , 2012 .

[38]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  The Impact of Categorical Status, Numeric Representation, and Work Group Prestige on Preference for Demographically Similar Others: A Value Threat Approach , 2012 .

[39]  Soong Moon Kang,et al.  The Organizational Selection of Status Characteristics: Status Evaluations in an Open Source Community , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[40]  Robert S. Nason,et al.  Why Do Family Firms Strive for Nonfinancial Goals? An Organizational Identity Perspective , 2013 .

[41]  K. Seers Qualitative data analysis , 2011, Evidence Based Nursing.

[42]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  The Prince and the Pauper: Search and Brokerage in the Initiation of Status-Heterophilous Ties , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[43]  Joel Podolny,et al.  Organizing Contests for Status: The Matthew Effect vs. the Mark Effect , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[44]  M. Nordqvist,et al.  Institutionalizing the Family Business: The Role of Professional Associations in Fostering a Change of Values , 2010 .

[45]  L. Gómez-Mejia,et al.  Socioemotional Wealth and Corporate Responses to Institutional Pressures: Do Family-Controlled Firms Pollute Less? , 2010 .

[46]  Kimberly A. Eddleston,et al.  Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity , 2010 .

[47]  Max-Peter Menzel,et al.  Cluster life cycles—dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution , 2010 .

[48]  Mark C. Suchman,et al.  Legitimacy in Organizational Institutionalism , 2009 .

[49]  Kathryn L. Heinze,et al.  Forage for Thought: Mobilizing Codes in the Movement for Grass-fed Meat and Dairy Products , 2008 .

[50]  Linda S. Niehm,et al.  Community Social Responsibility and Its Consequences for Family Business Performance*1 , 2008 .

[51]  Justin B. Craig,et al.  Leveraging Family‐Based Brand Identity to Enhance Firm Competitiveness and Performance in Family Businesses** , 2008 .

[52]  Michael Sauder,et al.  Interlopers and Field Change: The Entry of U.S. News into the Field of Legal Education , 2008 .

[53]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status , 2008 .

[54]  Leif Melin,et al.  The reflexive dynamics of institutionalization: the case of the family business , 2007 .

[55]  M. Ventresca,et al.  Inhabited Institutions: Social Interactions and Organizational Forms in Gouldner’s Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy , 2006 .

[56]  M. Lounsbury,et al.  Vive La Resistance: Competing Logics and the Consolidation of U.S. Community Banking , 2006 .

[57]  M. H. Fisek,et al.  Diffuse Status Characteristics and the Spread of Status Value: A Formal Theory1 , 2006, American Journal of Sociology.

[58]  Benyamin Lichtenstein,et al.  Complexity leadership theory: An interactive perspective on leading in complex adaptive systems , 2006 .

[59]  M. Glynn,et al.  Community Isomorphism and Corporate Social Action , 2007 .

[60]  F. Castellucci,et al.  What’s in it for them? Advantages of Higher Status Partners in Exchange Relationships , 2005 .

[61]  Sabine Klein,et al.  The F–PEC Scale of Family Influence: Construction, Validation, and Further Implication for Theory , 2005 .

[62]  E. Zajac,et al.  Status Evolution and Competition: Theory and Evidence , 2005 .

[63]  Isabelle Le Breton-Miller,et al.  Managing For The Long Run: Lessons In Competitive Advantage From Great Family Businesses , 2005 .

[64]  Roberta Senechal de la Roche Collision of Wills , 2005 .

[65]  C. Aronoff Self-Perpetuation Family Organization Built on Values: Necessary Condition for Long-Term Family Business Survival , 2004 .

[66]  W. D. Kinzley Machiavelli's Children: Leaders and Their Legacies in Italy and Japan , 2004 .

[67]  H. Rao,et al.  Institutional Change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle Cuisine as an Identity Movement in French Gastronomy1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[68]  Roger V. Gould Collision of Wills: How Ambiguity about Social Rank Breeds Conflict , 2003 .

[69]  Matti Koiranen,et al.  Over 100 Years of Age But Still Entrepreneurially Active in Business: Exploring the Values and Family Characteristics of Old Finnish Family Firms , 2002 .

[70]  M. Lounsbury INSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATION AND STATUS MOBILITY: THE PROFESSIONALIZATION OF THE FIELD OF FINANCE , 2002 .

[71]  Joel Podolny Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[72]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Agency Relationships in Family Firms: Theory and Evidence , 2001 .

[73]  Anita D. Bhappu,et al.  The Japanese Family: An Institutional Logic for Japanese Corporate Networks and Japanese Management , 2000 .

[74]  Joel Podolny,et al.  Status, Quality, and Social Order in the California Wine Industry , 1999 .

[75]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures , 1999 .

[76]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[77]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism , 1996 .

[78]  Joel Podolny A Status-Based Model of Market Competition , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[79]  John B. Ford,et al.  Japanese national culture as a basis for understanding Japanese business practices , 1992 .

[80]  Amy R. Lyman Customer Service: Does Family Ownership Make a Difference? , 1991 .

[81]  A. Pettigrew Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[82]  D. K. Freedheim,et al.  Treatment of individuals in family businesses. , 1989 .

[83]  Some Principles Governing the Thought and Behavior of Japanists (Contextualists) , 1982 .

[84]  M. Kuhn,et al.  Family, Socialization and Interaction Process , 1957, Pediatrics.

[85]  Philip Selznick An Approach to a Theory of Bureaucracy , 1943 .

[86]  C. Hayes History and the Present , 1936 .