Sham transcranial electrical stimulation and its effects on corticospinal excitability: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Sham stimulation is used in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the efficacy of active stimulation and placebo effects. It should mimic the characteristics of active stimulation to achieve blinding integrity. The present study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature to identify the effects of sham transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) – including anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS, c-tDCS), transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) and transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS) – on corticospinal excitability (CSE), compared to baseline in healthy individuals. Electronic databases – PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Science Direct and MEDLINE (Ovid) – were searched for RCTs of tES from 1990 to March 2017. Thirty RCTs were identified. Using a random-effects model, meta-analysis of a-tDCS, c-tDCS, tACS, tRNS and tPCS studies showed statistically non-significant pre-post effects of sham interventions on CSE. This review found evidence for statically non-significant effects of sham tES on CSE.

[1]  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Edited by Julian P. T. Higgins & , 2006 .

[2]  Ludovica Labruna,et al.  Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after‐effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation , 2017, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  Sho Kojima,et al.  Comparison of Three Non-Invasive Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Methods for Increasing Cortical Excitability , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[4]  Fabrizio Benedetti,et al.  Increasing uncertainty in CNS clinical trials: the role of placebo, nocebo, and Hawthorne effects , 2016, The Lancet Neurology.

[5]  O. Carter,et al.  Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions , 2016, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  J. Verhoeven,et al.  Developmental Foreign Accent Syndrome: Report of a New Case , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[7]  Paul B. Fitzgerald,et al.  Effects of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Working Memory: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Findings From Healthy and Neuropsychiatric Populations , 2016, Brain Stimulation.

[8]  Sho Kojima,et al.  Modulation of Cortical Inhibitory Circuits after Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Primary Motor Cortex , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[9]  N. Wenderoth,et al.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  Shapour Jaberzadeh,et al.  The effects of anodal-tDCS on corticospinal excitability enhancement and its after-effects: conventional vs. unihemispheric concurrent dual-site stimulation , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[11]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  Anodal Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation: The Effects of Pulse Duration on Corticospinal Excitability , 2015, PloS one.

[12]  J. Bouchaud,et al.  Why Do Markets Crash? Bitcoin Data Offers Unprecedented Insights , 2015, PloS one.

[13]  Janet L. Taylor,et al.  Comparison of the Effects of Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability , 2015, The journal of ECT.

[14]  Alexander T. Sack,et al.  Rethinking the role of sham TMS , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[15]  Phillip Wolff,et al.  Causal reasoning with forces , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[16]  C. Im,et al.  What is the optimal anodal electrode position for inducing corticomotor excitability changes in transcranial direct current stimulation? , 2015, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  S. Rossi,et al.  Time Course of Corticospinal Excitability and Autonomic Function Interplay during and Following Monopolar tDCS , 2014, Front. Psychiatry.

[18]  A. Antal,et al.  Comparing the Efficacy of Excitatory Transcranial Stimulation Methods Measuring Motor Evoked Potentials , 2014, Neural plasticity.

[19]  Shapour Jaberzadeh,et al.  Anodal transcranial pulsed current stimulation: A novel technique to enhance corticospinal excitability , 2014, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  D. Barch,et al.  An fMRI Study of the Influence of a History of Substance Abuse on Working Memory-Related Brain Activation in Schizophrenia , 2014, Front. Psychiatry.

[21]  S. Jaberzadeh,et al.  a-tDCS Differential Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability: The Effects of Electrode Size , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[22]  Myoung-Hwan Ko,et al.  Facilitation of corticospinal tract excitability by transcranial direct current stimulation combined with voluntary grip exercise , 2013, Neuroscience Letters.

[23]  Ran R. Hassin,et al.  Can Consumers Make Affordable Care Affordable? The Value of Choice Architecture , 2013, PloS one.

[24]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Evaluation of Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[25]  A. Frazer,et al.  Induction of cortical plasticity and improved motor performance following unilateral and bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex , 2013, BMC Neuroscience.

[26]  G. Thickbroom,et al.  Interaction Between Simultaneously Applied Neuromodulatory Interventions in Humans , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[27]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Partially non‐linear stimulation intensity‐dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  Robert Fleischmann,et al.  Evolution of Premotor Cortical Excitability after Cathodal Inhibition of the Primary Motor Cortex: A Sham-Controlled Serial Navigated TMS Study , 2013, PloS one.

[29]  Yi Wang,et al.  PI3K/Akt-independent negative regulation of JNK signaling by MKP-7 after cerebral ischemia in rat hippocampus , 2013, BMC Neuroscience.

[30]  F. Miller,et al.  The potential benefit of the placebo effect in sham-controlled trials: implications for risk-benefit assessments and informed consent , 2012, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[31]  Louise Marston,et al.  Rethinking Clinical Trials of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Participant and Assessor Blinding Is Inadequate at Intensities of 2mA , 2012, PloS one.

[32]  A. Antal,et al.  Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[33]  V. Clark,et al.  Enhancement of object detection with transcranial direct current stimulation is associated with increased attention , 2012, BMC Neuroscience.

[34]  Akio Kimura,et al.  Comparison of the After-Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Motor Cortex in Patients With Stroke and Healthy Volunteers , 2012, The International journal of neuroscience.

[35]  P. Turkeltaub,et al.  Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[36]  Simon C. Potter,et al.  A Genome-Wide Association Search for Type 2 Diabetes Genes in African Americans , 2012, PLoS ONE.

[37]  A. Hrõbjartsson,et al.  Placebo effect studies are susceptible to response bias and to other types of biases. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[38]  A. Antal,et al.  Evaluating Aftereffects of Short-Duration Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation on Cortical Excitability , 2011, Neural plasticity.

[39]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Boosting brain excitability by transcranial high frequency stimulation in the ripple range , 2010, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  A. Antal,et al.  Increasing Human Brain Excitability by Transcranial High- Frequency Random Noise Stimulation , 2009, NeuroImage.

[41]  L. Hedges,et al.  Fixed‐Effect Versus Random‐Effects Models , 2009 .

[42]  S. Straube,et al.  Enriched enrollment: definition and effects of enrichment and dose in trials of pregabalin and gabapentin in neuropathic pain. A systematic review. , 2008, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[43]  A. Antal,et al.  Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[44]  A. Antal,et al.  Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients , 2007, Brain Research Bulletin.

[45]  G. Thickbroom,et al.  Perception of comfort during transcranial DC stimulation: Effect of NaCl solution concentration applied to sponge electrodes , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[46]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[47]  Cheryl L Porter,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex affects cortical drive to human musculature as assessed by intermuscular coherence , 2006, The Journal of physiology.

[48]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): A tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[49]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Preconditioning with transcranial direct current stimulation sensitizes the motor cortex to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation and controls the direction of after-effects , 2004, Biological Psychiatry.

[50]  A. Quartarone,et al.  Long lasting effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor imagery , 2004, Neuroreport.

[51]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Preconditioning of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence for Homeostatic Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[53]  Jonathan A C Sterne,et al.  Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. , 2001, BMJ.

[54]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[55]  F. Miller,et al.  consent risk-benefit assessments and informed sham-controlled trials: implications for The potential benefit of the placebo effect in , 2013 .

[56]  A. Antal,et al.  Modulating neuronal excitability in the motor cortex with tDCS shows moderate hemispheric asymmetry due to subjects' handedness: a pilot study. , 2012, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[57]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation in the low kHz range increases motor cortex excitability. , 2011, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[58]  Jonathan J Deeks,et al.  Statistical algorithms in Review Manager , 2010 .