Adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer using kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography: first clinical results.

PURPOSE To evaluate the first clinical results of an off-line adaptive radiotherapy (ART) protocol for prostate cancer using kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in combination with a diet and mild laxatives. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twenty-three patients began treatment with a planning target volume (PTV) margin of 10 mm. The CBCT scans acquired during the first six fractions were used to generate an average prostate clinical target volume (AV-CTV), and average rectum (AV-Rect). Using these structures, a new treatment plan was generated with a 7-mm PTV margin. Weekly CBCT scans were used to monitor the CTV coverage. A diet and mild laxatives were introduced to improve image quality and reduce prostate motion. RESULTS Twenty patients were treated with conform ART protocol. For these patients, 91% of the CBCT scans could be used to calculate the AV-CTV and AV-Rect. In 96% of the follow-up CBCT scans, the CTV was located within the average PTV. In the remaining 4%, the prostate extended the PTV by a maximum of 1 mm. Systematic and random errors for organ motion were reduced by a factor of two compared with historical data without diet and laxatives. An average PTV reduction of 29% was achieved. The volume of the AV-Rect that received >65 Gy was reduced by 19%. The mean dose to the anal wall was reduced on average by 4.8 Gy. CONCLUSIONS We safely reduced the high-dose region by 29%. The reduction in irradiated volume led to a significant reduction in the dose to the rectum. The diet and laxatives improved the image quality and tended to reduce prostate motion.

[1]  Michael J. Zelefsky,et al.  High-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: early toxicity and biochemical outcome in 772 patients. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  M S Hoogeman,et al.  Dose-wall histograms and normalized dose-surface histograms for the rectum: a new method to analyze the dose distribution over the rectum in conformal radiotherapy. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  D P Dearnaley,et al.  Evaluating the effect of rectal distension and rectal movement on prostate gland position using cine MRI. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Patrick A Kupelian,et al.  Influence of intrafraction motion on margins for prostate radiotherapy. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  M van Herk,et al.  A verification procedure to improve patient set-up accuracy using portal images. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  P. Koper,et al.  Localized volume effects for late rectal and anal toxicity after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Joos V Lebesque,et al.  Dose-response in radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: results of the Dutch multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing 68 Gy of radiotherapy with 78 Gy. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  Joos V Lebesque,et al.  Reduction of rectal dose by integration of the boost in the large-field treatment plan for prostate irradiation. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  P. Koper,et al.  Acute and late complications after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: results of a multicenter randomized trial comparing 68 Gy to 78 Gy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Di Yan,et al.  Phase II dose escalation study of image-guided adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer: use of dose-volume constraints to achieve rectal isotoxicity. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Frank Van den Heuvel,et al.  Clinical application of a repositioning scheme, using gold markers and electronic portal imaging. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  David A Jaffray,et al.  Automatic localization of the prostate for on-line or off-line image-guided radiotherapy. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  K. Lam,et al.  Retrospective analysis of prostate cancer patients with implanted gold markers using off-line and adaptive therapy protocols. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  George Starkschall,et al.  Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M. D. Anderson phase III randomized trial. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  D Yan,et al.  An off-line strategy for constructing a patient-specific planning target volume in adaptive treatment process for prostate cancer. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Quantification of local rectal wall displacements by virtual rectum unfolding. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Prostate gland motion assessed with cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI). , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  M. Eble,et al.  Influence of the initial rectal distension on posterior margins in primary and postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[19]  J Wong,et al.  Improvement in dose escalation using the process of adaptive radiotherapy combined with three-dimensional conformal or intensity-modulated beams for prostate cancer. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  John Wong,et al.  A dose-escalation trial with the adaptive radiotherapy process as a delivery system in localized prostate cancer: analysis of chronic toxicity. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  William R. Fair,et al.  DOSE ESCALATION WITH THREE-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL RADIATION THERAPY AFFECTS THE OUTCOME IN PROSTATE CANCER , 1998 .

[22]  M van Herk,et al.  Variation in volumes, dose-volume histograms, and estimated normal tissue complication probabilities of rectum and bladder during conformal radiotherapy of T3 prostate cancer. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  When should systematic patient positioning errors in radiotherapy be corrected? , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Joos V Lebesque,et al.  Strategies to reduce the systematic error due to tumor and rectum motion in radiotherapy of prostate cancer. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[25]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: initial performance characterization. , 2000, Medical physics.

[26]  David Jaffray,et al.  Online image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: How much improvement can we expect? A theoretical assessment of clinical benefits and potential dose escalation by improving precision and accuracy of radiation delivery. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  Joos V Lebesque,et al.  An adaptive off-line procedure for radiotherapy of prostate cancer. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  M van Herk,et al.  Quantification of organ motion during conformal radiotherapy of the prostate by three dimensional image registration. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Automatic prostate localization on cone-beam CT scans for high precision image-guided radiotherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.