Investigation of Cyclicity of Kinematic Resolution Methods for Serial and Parallel Planar Manipulators

Kinematic redundancy of manipulators is a well-understood topic, and various methods were developed for the redundancy resolution in order to solve the inverse kinematics problem, at least for serial manipulators. An important question, with high practical relevance, is whether the inverse kinematics solution is cyclic, i.e., whether the redundancy solution leads to a closed path in joint space as a solution of a closed path in task space. This paper investigates the cyclicity property of two widely used redundancy resolution methods, namely the projected gradient method (PGM) and the augmented Jacobian method (AJM), by means of examples. Both methods determine solutions that minimize an objective function, and from an application point of view, the sensitivity of the methods on the initial configuration is crucial. Numerical results are reported for redundant serial robotic arms and for redundant parallel kinematic manipulators. While the AJM is known to be cyclic, it turns out that also the PGM exhibits cyclicity. However, only the PGM converges to the local optimum of the objective function when starting from an initial configuration of the cyclic trajectory.

[1]  V. V. M. J. Satish Chembuly,et al.  An efficient approach for inverse kinematics and redundancy resolution scheme of hyper-redundant manipulators , 2018 .

[2]  Xiaoou Li,et al.  Multi-agent reinforcement learning for redundant robot control in task-space , 2020, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[3]  Shaheen Ahmad,et al.  Predicting the drift motion for kinematically redundant robots , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[4]  Dragomir N. Nenchev,et al.  Redundancy resolution through local optimization: A review , 1989, J. Field Robotics.

[5]  Bruno Siciliano,et al.  Kinematic control of redundant robot manipulators: A tutorial , 1990, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[6]  Charles A. Klein,et al.  The nature of drift in pseudoinverse control of kinematically redundant manipulators , 1989, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[7]  Pyung Hun Chang,et al.  A closed-form solution for inverse kinematics of robot manipulators with redundancy , 1987, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[8]  T. Shamir,et al.  Repeatability of redundant manipulators: mathematical solution of the problem , 1988 .

[9]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Singularity analysis of closed-loop kinematic chains , 1990, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[10]  Mahmoud Moghavvemi,et al.  Geometrical approach of planar hyper-redundant manipulators: Inverse kinematics, path planning and workspace , 2011, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[11]  Charles A. Klein,et al.  A new formulation of the extended Jacobian method and its use in mapping algorithmic singularities for kinematically redundant manipulators , 1995, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[12]  Raffaele Di Gregorio,et al.  A Technique Based on Adaptive Extended Jacobians for Improving the Robustness of the Inverse Numerical Kinematics of Redundant Robots , 2019 .