Trust in close relationships.

A theoretical model describing interpersonal trust in close relationships is presented. Three dimensions of trust are identified, based on the type of attributions drawn about a partner's motives. These dimensions are also characterized by a developmental progression in the relationship. The validity of this theoretical perspective was examined through evidence obtained from a survey of a heterogeneous sample of established couples. An analysis of the Trust Scale in this sample was consistent with the notion that the predictability, dependability, and faith components represent distinct and coherent dimensions. A scale to measure interpersonal motives was also developed. The perception of intrinsic motives in a partner emerged as a dimension, as did instrumental and extrinsic motives. As expected, love and happiness were closely tied to feelings of faith and the attribution of intrinsic motivation to both self and partner. Women appeared to have more integrated, complex views of their relationships than men: All three forms of trust were strongly related and attributions of instrumental motives in their partners seemed to be self-affirming. Finally, there was a tendency for people to view their own motives as less self-centered and more exclusively intrinsic in flavor than their partner's motives.

[1]  L. Strickland.  Surveillance and trust. , 1958, Journal of personality.

[2]  L. Strickland.  Surveillance and trust1 , 1958 .

[3]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[4]  W. A. Barry,et al.  Marriage research and conflict: an integrative review. , 1970, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  M. E. Lipetz,et al.  Parental interference and romantic love: the Romeo and Juliet effect. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  I. Altman,et al.  Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships , 1973 .

[7]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[8]  M. Deutsch.  The Resolution of ConflictConstructive and Destructive Processes , 1974 .

[9]  Z. Rubin.  Liking and Loving: An Invitation to Social Psychology , 1973 .

[10]  E. Foa,et al.  Societal Structures of the Mind , 1974 .

[11]  L. Rowell Huesmann,et al.  Incremental exchange theory: a formal model for progression in dyadic social interaction. , 1976 .

[12]  K. Dion,et al.  Love, Liking, and Trust in Heterosexual Relationships , 1976 .

[13]  Letitia Anne Peplau,et al.  Breakups Before Marriage: The End of 103 Affairs , 1976 .

[14]  M. Lerner.  The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms1 , 1977 .

[15]  Bernard G. Guerney,et al.  Relationship enhancement : [skill-training programs for therapy, problem prevention, and enrichment] , 1977 .

[16]  J. Scanzoni.  3 – Social Exchange and Behavioral Interdependence , 1979 .

[17]  H. Kelley.  Personal Relationships: Their Structures and Processes , 1979 .

[18]  F. Nye,et al.  Social Exchange in Developing Relationships , 1979 .

[19]  M. Brewer,et al.  A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. , 1979 .

[20]  M. Clark,et al.  Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. , 1979 .

[21]  J. Rotter.  Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. , 1980 .

[22]  M. Zanna,et al.  Effects of salience of extrinsic rewards on liking and loving. , 1980 .

[23]  T. Huston,et al.  The Dyadic Trust Scale: Toward Understanding Interpersonal Trust in Close Relationships. , 1980 .

[24]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  The Exchange Process in Close Relationships , 1981 .

[25]  M. Lerner,et al.  The Justice Motive in Social Behavior , 1981 .

[26]  Matthias Burisch,et al.  Approaches to personality inventory construction: A comparison of merits. , 1984 .