Rolling with the flow: bumblebees flying in unsteady wakes

SUMMARY Our understanding of how variable wind in natural environments affects flying insects is limited because most studies of insect flight are conducted in either smooth flow or still air conditions. Here, we investigate the effects of structured, unsteady flow (the von Karman vortex street behind a cylinder) on the flight performance of bumblebees (Bombus impatiens). Bumblebees are ‘all-weather’ foragers and thus frequently experience variable aerial conditions, ranging from fully mixed, turbulent flow to unsteady, structured vortices near objects such as branches and stems. We examined how bumblebee flight performance differs in unsteady versus smooth flow, as well as how the orientation of unsteady flow structures affects their flight performance, by filming bumblebees flying in a wind tunnel under various flow conditions. The three-dimensional flight trajectories and orientations of bumblebees were quantified in each of three flow conditions: (1) smooth flow, (2) the unsteady wake of a vertical cylinder (inducing strong lateral disturbances) and (3) the unsteady wake of a horizontal cylinder (inducing strong vertical disturbances). In both unsteady conditions, bumblebees attenuated the disturbances induced by the wind quite effectively, but still experienced significant translational and rotational fluctuations as compared with flight in smooth flow. Bees appeared to be most sensitive to disturbance along the lateral axis, displaying large lateral accelerations, translations and rolling motions in response to both unsteady flow conditions, regardless of orientation. Bees also displayed the greatest agility around the roll axis, initiating voluntary casting maneuvers and correcting for lateral disturbances mainly through roll in all flow conditions. Both unsteady flow conditions reduced the upstream flight speed of bees, suggesting an increased cost of flight in unsteady flow, with potential implications for foraging patterns and colony energetics in natural, variable wind environments.

[1]  A. Roshko.  Experiments on the flow past a circular cylinder at very high Reynolds number , 1961, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  B. J. Vickery.  Fluctuating lift and drag on a long cylinder of square cross-section in a smooth and in a turbulent stream , 1966, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  John B. Free,et al.  Bumblebee economics , 1979, Nature.

[4]  J. Feltwell.  Large white butterfly. The biology, biochemistry and physiology of Pieris brassicae (Linnaeus). , 1982 .

[5]  C. Ellington.  The Aerodynamics of Hovering Insect Flight. II. Morphological Parameters , 1984 .

[6]  V. Drake,et al.  The Influence of Atmospheric Structure and Motions on Insect Migration , 1988 .

[7]  R. Stull.  An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology , 1988 .

[8]  Midges in Scotland , 1989 .

[9]  R. Dudley,et al.  Mechanics of Forward Flight in Bumblebees: I. Kinematics and Morphology , 1990 .

[10]  R. Dudley,et al.  Mechanics of Forward Flight in Bumblebees: II. QUASI-STEADY LIFT AND POWER REQUIREMENTS , 1990 .

[11]  C. Ellington.  Limitations on Animal Flight Performance , 1991 .

[12]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  Leading-edge vortices in insect flight , 1996, Nature.

[13]  C. Ellington,et al.  The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. I. Kinematics of hovering and forward flight. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  R. Dudley.  The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form, Function, Evolution , 1999 .

[15]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. , 1999, Science.

[16]  G. Lauder,et al.  Fish Exploiting Vortices Decrease Muscle Activity , 2003, Science.

[17]  Sanjay P Sane,et al.  The aerodynamics of insect flight , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[18]  Z. Jane Wang,et al.  DISSECTING INSECT FLIGHT , 2005 .

[19]  W. H. Melbourne,et al.  Atmospheric winds and their implications for microair vehicles , 2006 .

[20]  James Diebel,et al.  Representing Attitude : Euler Angles , Unit Quaternions , and Rotation Vectors , 2006 .

[21]  G. Lauder,et al.  Passive propulsion in vortex wakes , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[22]  J. Liao,et al.  A review of fish swimming mechanics and behaviour in altered flows , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Tyson L Hedrick,et al.  Software techniques for two- and three-dimensional kinematic measurements of biological and biomimetic systems , 2008, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[24]  S. Combes,et al.  Turbulence-driven instabilities limit insect flight performance , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  C. Peskin,et al.  Flexible clap and fling in tiny insect flight , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[26]  D. Reynolds,et al.  Recent insights from radar studies of insect flight. , 2011, Annual review of entomology.

[27]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  Operation of the alula as an indicator of gear change in hoverflies , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[28]  Tyson L Hedrick,et al.  Damping in flapping flight and its implications for manoeuvring, scaling and evolution , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[29]  Nicholas Ivan Kostreski.  Automated Kinematic Extraction of Wing and Body Motions of Free Flying Diptera , 2012 .

[30]  Rajat Mittal,et al.  Hawkmoth flight stability in turbulent vortex streets , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[31]  J S Humbert,et al.  Kinematic strategies for mitigating gust perturbations in insects , 2013, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[32]  Z. J. Wang,et al.  Active and passive stabilization of body pitch in insect flight , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[33]  Kristi A Morgansen,et al.  Flexible strategies for flight control: an active role for the abdomen , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.