University patenting and the pace of industrial innovation

Universities, traditionally sources of basic science and research knowledge for industrial researchers, have responded to recent public policy changes by increasingly patenting research results produced by academic researchers. While proponents of strong intellectual property protection argue the benefits of strong rights to promote innovation and facilitate markets for knowledge exchange, critics express concerns over restrictions on diffusion and use of upstream knowledge. Results of an analysis of industrial innovation suggest that increasing university patenting is associated with a slowing pace of knowledge exploitation, especially in technology areas that rely more heavily on science as an input to innovation. This new evidence suggests that university patenting may indeed be hindering or at least slowing industrial innovation. Copyright 2007 , Oxford University Press.

[1]  Kenneth L. Sokoloff,et al.  Inventive Activity and the Market for Technology in the United States, 1840-1920 , 1999 .

[2]  Amalya L. Oliver,et al.  Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms , 1994 .

[3]  David J. Teece,et al.  The Market for Know-How and the Efficient International Transfer of Technology , 1981 .

[4]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  Withholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of faculty. , 1997, JAMA.

[5]  E. Mansfield,et al.  The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support , 1996 .

[6]  D Blumenthal,et al.  University-industry research relationships in biotechnology: implications for the university. , 1986, Science.

[7]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  THE NBER/SLOAN PROJECT ON INDUSTRIAL TECHAIOLOGY AND PRODUCTIVITY: INCORPORATING LEARNING FROM PLANT VISITS AND INTERVIEWS INTO ECONOMIC RESEARCHt Knowledge Spillovers and Patent Citations: Evidence from a Survey of Inventors , 2000 .

[8]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States , 2002 .

[9]  P. David Knowledge, Property, and the System Dynamics of Technological Change , 1992 .

[10]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[11]  R. Nelson The Role of Knowledge in R&D Efficiency , 1982 .

[12]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[13]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Academic research and industrial innovation , 1991 .

[14]  A. Link,et al.  Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration , 2003 .

[15]  A. Arora Licensing Tacit Knowledge: Intellectual Property Rights And The Market For Know-How , 1995 .

[16]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[17]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .

[18]  John Walsh,et al.  Knowledge Accumulation and Industry Evolution: The effects of research tool patents and licensing on biomedical innovation , 2006 .

[19]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[20]  Samuel Kortum,et al.  Research, Patenting, and Technological Change , 1997 .

[21]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[22]  Francis Narin,et al.  Status report: Linkage between technology and science , 1992 .

[23]  O. Williamson Markets and Hierarchies , 1975 .

[24]  A. Gambardella Competitive advantages from in-house scientific research: The US pharmaceutical industry in the 1980s * , 1992 .

[25]  Paul A. David,et al.  Common Agency Contracting and the Emergence of "Open Science" Institutions , 1998 .

[26]  Robert P. Morgan,et al.  Contributions of Academic Research to Industrial Performance in Five Industry Sectors , 2001 .

[27]  E. Mansfield Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings1 , 1998 .

[28]  N. Rosenberg Science, Invention and Economic Growth , 1974 .

[29]  R. Nelson,et al.  The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: a contribution to the current debate , 1998 .

[30]  E. Duflo,et al.  How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? , 2001 .

[31]  N. Rosenberg Why do firms do basic research (with their own money) , 1990 .

[32]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: How Do University Inventions Get Into Practice? , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[33]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: a re-examination , 2003 .

[34]  David J. Teece,et al.  Capturing Value from Technological Innovation: Integration, Strategic Partnering, and Licensing Decisions , 1988 .

[35]  E. Mansfield Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations , 1995 .

[36]  David L. Deeds,et al.  An Analysis of the Critical Role of Public Science in Innovation: The Case of Biotechnology , 2000 .

[37]  Wesley M. Cohen Patents and Appropriation: Concerns and Evidence1 , 2004 .

[38]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[39]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Science as a Map in Technological Search , 2000 .

[40]  D. Mowery,et al.  Inside the black box: The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies , 1993 .

[41]  W. Dugger The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[42]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  University–incubator firm knowledge flows: assessing their impact on incubator firm performance , 2005 .

[43]  D. Teece Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation☆ , 1996 .

[44]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .

[45]  Robert E. Evenson,et al.  A Stochastic Model of Applied Research , 1976, Journal of Political Economy.

[46]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[47]  A. Jaffe The U.S. patent system in transition: policy innovation and the innovation process , 2000 .

[48]  D. Mowery,et al.  Analysing The Economic Payoffs From Basic Research , 1992 .

[49]  R. Nelson The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[50]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[51]  Irwin Feller,et al.  Universities as engines of R&D-based economic growth: They think they can , 1990 .

[52]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Publicly Funded Science and the Productivity of the Pharmaceutical Industry , 2000, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[53]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Capitalism as an engine of progress , 1990 .

[54]  Nancy Gallini,et al.  The Economics of Patents: Lessons from Recent U.S. Patent Reform , 2002 .

[55]  Mildred K Cho,et al.  Effects of patents and licenses on the provision of clinical genetic testing services. , 2003, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[56]  D Blumenthal,et al.  Relationships between academic institutions and industry in the life sciences--an industry survey. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.