General equilibrium effects of a supply side GHG mitigation option under the Clean Development Mechanism.

The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) under the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is considered a key instrument to encourage developing countries' participation in the mitigation of global climate change. Reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through the energy supply and demand side activities are the main options to be implemented under the CDM. This paper analyses the general equilibrium effects of a supply side GHG mitigation option-the substitution of thermal power with hydropower--in Thailand under the CDM. A static multi-sector general equilibrium model has been developed for the purpose of this study. The key finding of the study is that the substitution of electricity generation from thermal power plants with that from hydropower plants would increase economic welfare in Thailand. The supply side option would, however, adversely affect the gross domestic product (GDP) and the trade balance. The percentage changes in economic welfare, GDP and trade balance increase with the level of substitution and the price of certified emission reduction (CER) units.

[1]  Dallas Burtraw,et al.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Instruments for Environmental Protection in a Second-Best Setting , 1998 .

[2]  Unfccc.  Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1997 .

[3]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  The Kyoto Protocol: A Cost-Effective Strategy for Meeting Environmental Objectives? , 1999 .

[4]  Thomas F. Rutherford,et al.  Effects of Restrictions on International Permit Trading: The MS-MRT Model , 1999 .

[5]  J. Bollen,et al.  Clubs, Ceilings and CDM: Macroeconomics of Compliance with the Kyoto Protocol , 1999 .

[6]  John Whalley,et al.  A General Equilibrium Model for Tax Policy Evaluation , 1985 .

[7]  D. Jorgenson,et al.  Reducing US carbon emissions: an econometric general equilibrium assessment , 1993 .

[8]  K. Derviş,et al.  General equilibrium models for development policy , 1982 .

[9]  Paul S. Armington.  A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production (Une théorie de la demande de produits différenciés d'après leur origine) (Una teoría de la demanda de productos distinguiéndolos según el lugar de producción) , 1969 .

[10]  Regrets or No Regrets -- That is the Question: Is Conservation an Costless CO2 Mitigation Strategy? , 1995 .

[11]  J. Shoven,et al.  Applying general equilibrium , 1993 .

[12]  L. Goulder,et al.  When Can Carbon Abatement Policies Increase Welfare? The Fundamental Role of Distorted Factor Markets , 1996 .

[13]  L. Goulder,et al.  Optimal Environmental Taxation in the Presence of Other Taxes: General Equilibrium Analyses , 1994 .

[14]  ZhongXiang Zhang,et al.  The economics of energy policy in China : implications for global climate change , 1998 .

[15]  S. Alam,et al.  Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1993 .

[16]  Joseph J. Harrington,et al.  An Applied General Equilibrium (AGE) analysis of a policy designed to reduce the household consumption of wood in the Sudan , 1994 .

[17]  Govinda R. Timilsina,et al.  General equilibrium analysis of economic and environmental effects of carbon tax in a developing country: case of Thailand , 2002 .

[18]  L. Bergman.  The Impact of Nuclear Power Discontinuation in Sweden: A General Equilibrium Analysis , 1981 .

[19]  Urs Springer.  The Market for Tradable GHG Permits under the Kyoto Protocol: A Survey of Model Studies , 2002 .

[20]  F. Naqvi.  A computable general equilibrium model of energy, economy and equity interactions in Pakistan , 1998 .

[21]  T. Rutherford,et al.  Carbon Taxes with Exemptions in an Open Economy: A General Equilibrium Analysis of the German Tax Initiative , 1997 .

[22]  Heinz Welsch,et al.  Coal subsidization and nuclear phase-out in a general equilibrium model for Germany , 1998 .