Modeling competition between plants using an Individual Based Model: Methods and effects on the growth of two species with contrasted growth forms

Individual Based Models are emergent modeling approaches that are developed on the behavior of interacting individuals to study ecosystems properties. Their relevance resides in the validity of the interaction rules between individuals defined in the model. Competitive interactions between plant individuals can be implemented from the combination of four main attributes: (i) the zone of interaction of the target plant, (ii) the intensity of competition, (iii) the effect of competition, and (iv) the target plant response. This study aims at determining the effects of the method used for modeling competition on the performance and individual architecture of two species. We simulated the growth of a guerilla and of a phalanx species either in monoculture or in mixture using 61 methods for modeling competition derived from the published literature and implemented in an Individual Based Model. We showed that (i) the performance and individual architecture of the two species varies with the modeling method, (ii) the effect of the modeling method on the model outputs depends on the species and on the assemblage considered. We subsequently emphasized the importance of accurately calibrating models in particular with experimental data. We finally proposed basic rules supported by literature to evaluate the relevance of the different methods tested.

[1]  V. Grimm.  Ten years of individual-based modelling in ecology: what have we learned and what could we learn in the future? , 1999 .

[2]  K. Kull,et al.  Clonal growth in a species-rich grassland: Results of a 20-year fertilization experiment , 2003, Folia Geobotanica.

[3]  Uta Berger,et al.  A new approach to spatially explicit modelling of forest dynamics: spacing, ageing and neighbourhood competition of mangrove trees , 2000 .

[4]  L. Leeflang.  Response of Trifolium repens to a mosaic of bare and vegetated patches , 2000 .

[5]  Colin P.D. Birch,et al.  Rectangular and hexagonal grids used for observation, experiment and simulation in ecology , 2007 .

[6]  J. Stuefer,et al.  On the ecological and evolutionary significance of storage in clonal plants , 1999 .

[7]  E. Winkler,et al.  Sexual and vegetative reproduction of Hieracium pilosella L. under competition and disturbance: a grid-based simulation model. , 2002, Annals of botany.

[8]  John L. Harper,et al.  OCCUPATION OF BIOLOGICAL SPACE DURING SEEDLING ESTABLISHMENT , 1972 .

[9]  Beáta Oborny,et al.  Growth rules in clonal plants and environmental predictability - A simulation study , 1994 .

[10]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  A simple cellular automaton model for high-level vegetation dynamics , 2007 .

[11]  B. Carlsson,et al.  Clonal plants in the community , 2005 .

[12]  John L. Harper,et al.  Clonal growth in grassland perennials. I: Density and pattern-dependent competition between plants with different growth forms , 1985 .

[13]  L. Gough,et al.  Architectural and growth traits differ in effects on performance of clonal plants: an analysis using a field-parameterized simulation model , 2007 .

[14]  Jonathan Silvertown,et al.  Cellular Automaton Models of Interspecific Competition for Space--The Effect of Pattern on Process , 1992 .

[15]  K. Kull,et al.  A comparison of plant communities on the basis of their clonal growth patterns , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[16]  Ádám Kun,et al.  THE EFFECT OF CLONAL INTEGRATION ON PLANT COMPETITION FOR MOSAIC HABITAT SPACE , 2000 .

[17]  K. Landa,et al.  Physiological integration for carbon in mayapple (Podophyllum peltatum), a clonal perennial herb , 1992 .

[18]  P. Jolliffe,et al.  Indices of plant competition , 2003 .

[19]  Mike Bithell,et al.  Escape from the cell: Spatially explicit modelling with and without grids , 2007 .

[20]  John A. Silander,et al.  Neighborhood predictors of plant performance , 1985, Oecologia.

[21]  L. L. Doust,et al.  Population dynamics and local specialization in a clonal perennial (Ranunculus repens). I. The dynamics of ramets in contrasting habitats , 1981 .

[22]  Drew W. Purves,et al.  Fine‐scale spatial structure in a grassland community: quantifying the plant’s‐eye view , 2002 .

[23]  C. Mony,et al.  Do spatial patterns of clonal fragments and architectural responses to defoliation depend on the structural blue-print? An experimental test with two rhizomatous Cyperaceae , 2010, Evolutionary Ecology.

[24]  P. Alpert.  Effects of clonal integration on plant plasticity in Fragaria chiloensis , 1999, Plant Ecology.

[25]  G. P. Cheplick.  Responses to severe competitive stress in a clonal plant : differences between genotypes , 1997 .

[26]  Alexandra Weigelt,et al.  Identifying mechanisms of competition in multi‐species communities , 2007 .

[27]  H. Kroon,et al.  Resource partitioning in relation to clonal growth strategy , 1990 .

[28]  Drew W. Purves,et al.  Uniting pattern and process in plant ecology , 2001 .

[29]  John L. Harper,et al.  INTERFERENCE IN DUNE ANNUALS: SPATIAL PATTERN AND NEIGHBOURHOOD EFFECTS , 1977 .

[30]  H. Huber,et al.  The role of stolon internodes for ramet survival after clone fragmentation in Potentilla anserina , 1999 .

[31]  A. Novoplansky,et al.  Fight or flight: plastic behavior under self-generated heterogeneity , 2010, Evolutionary Ecology.

[32]  Stefan Klotz,et al.  Clonal plant species in a dry-grassland community: A simulation study of long-term population dynamics , 1997 .

[33]  Mark Rees,et al.  Quantifying the Impact of Competition and Spatial Heterogeneity on the Structure and Dynamics of a Four-Species Guild of Winter Annuals , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[34]  D. Pyke,et al.  Ramet spacing of Elymus lanceolatus (thickspike wheatgrass) in response to neighbour density , 2001 .

[35]  Deborah E. Goldberg,et al.  NEIGHBORHOOD COMPETITION IN AN OLD-FIELD PLANT COMMUNITY' , 1987 .

[36]  H. Kroon,et al.  Variation in petiole and internode length affects plant performance in Trifolium repens under opposing selection regimes , 2008, Evolutionary Ecology.

[37]  Drew W. Purves,et al.  Intraspecific aggregation and species coexistence. , 2002 .

[38]  Ádám Kun,et al.  Exploration and exploitation of resource patches by clonal growth: A spatial model on the effect of transport between modules , 2001 .

[39]  D. Goldberg,et al.  Competitive effect and response in four annual plants , 1987 .

[40]  L. Leeflang.  Are stoloniferous plants able to avoid neighbours in response to low R: FR ratios in reflected light? , 1999, Plant Ecology.

[41]  B. Oborny,et al.  Survival and competition of clonal plant populations in spatially and temporally heterogeneous habitats , 2003 .

[42]  Ariel Novoplansky,et al.  Picking battles wisely: plant behaviour under competition. , 2009, Plant, cell & environment.

[43]  J Uchmański,et al.  Individual-based modelling in ecology: what makes the difference? , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[44]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Frontiers in Mathematical Biology , 1995 .

[45]  T. Herben,et al.  A simulation study of the effects of architectural constraints and resource translocation on population structure and competition in clonal plants , 2001, Evolutionary Ecology.

[46]  K. Landa,et al.  Competitive effect and response: hierarchies and correlated traits in the early stages of competition , 1991 .

[47]  Mark V. Wilson.  Measuring the components of competition along productivity gradients , 2007 .

[48]  H. Kroon,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL RAMET AGGREGATION IN THE CLONAL PLANT AGROSTIS STOLONIFERA REDUCES ITS COMPETITIVE ABILITY , 2005 .

[49]  J. Connolly,et al.  Designs for greenhouse studies of interactions between plants , 1999 .

[50]  A. J. S. McDonald,et al.  Improving the effectiveness of angular dispersion in plant neighbourhood models. , 2010 .

[51]  G. Fox.  Assortative Mating and Plant Phenology: Evolutionary and Practical Consequences , 2003 .

[52]  Steven F. Railsback,et al.  Individual-based modeling and ecology , 2005 .

[53]  P. Carey,et al.  Morphological plasticity in Trifolium repens L.: the effects of clone genotype, soil nutrient level, and the genotype of conspecific neighbours , 1997 .

[54]  R. Holliday.  Plant Population and Crop Yield , 1960, Nature.

[55]  H. Kroon,et al.  CLONAL GROWTH IN PLANTS: REGULATION AND FUNCTION , 1990 .

[56]  T. Herben.  Physiological integration affects growth form and competitive ability in clonal plants , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[57]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  Non-manipulative estimates of competition coefficients in a Montane grassland community , 1997 .

[58]  Spacer length in clonal plants and the efficiency of resource capture in heterogeneous environments: A Monte Carlo simulation , 1994, Folia Geobotanica.

[59]  Mark van Kleunen,et al.  Constraints on the evolution of adaptive phenotypic plasticity in plants. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[60]  Tomáš Herben,et al.  Spatio-temporal Patterns in Grassland Communities , 1999 .

[61]  F. Wilson,et al.  Competitive relationships in a fertile grassland community – does size matter? , 2002, Oecologia.

[62]  L. Thompson.  The Influence of Natural Canopy Density on the Growth of White Clover, Trifolium repens , 1993 .

[63]  H. Huber,et al.  Shade-induced changes in the branching pattern of a stoloniferous herb: functional response or allometric effect? , 1997, Oecologia.

[64]  Tomasz Wyszomirski,et al.  Simple mechanisms of size distribution dynamics in crowded and uncrowded virtual monocultures , 1999 .

[65]  M. Fischer,et al.  Simulating the evolution of a clonal trait in plants with sexual and vegetative reproduction , 2008 .

[66]  Uta Berger,et al.  Cyclic dynamics in simulated plant populations , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[67]  A. Novoplansky,et al.  Implications of self/non-self discrimination for spatial patterning of clonal plants , 2008, Evolutionary Ecology.

[68]  A. Łomnicki.  Population ecology of individuals , 1988 .

[69]  L. Firbank,et al.  On the analysis of competition at the level of the individual plant , 2004, Oecologia.

[70]  G. P. Cheplick,et al.  Clonal growth and storage in relation to competition in genets of the rhizomatous perennial Amphibromus scabrivalvis , 2000 .

[71]  Rob J. J. Hendriks,et al.  Comparative ecology of clonal plants , 1996 .

[72]  B. Schmid,et al.  Experimental life‐history evolution: selection on growth form and its plasticity in a clonal plant , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[73]  H. Huber,et al.  Spatial structure of stoloniferous herbs: an interplay between structural blue-print, ontogeny and phenotypic plasticity , 1999, Plant Ecology.

[74]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  A Neighborhood Model of Annual‐Plant Interference , 1982 .

[75]  B. Svensson,et al.  Ramet demography in a ring‐forming clonal sedge , 2003 .

[76]  J. Wild,et al.  Krummholz and grassland coexistence above the forest-line in the Krkonoše Mountains: Grid-based model of shrub dynamics , 2008 .

[77]  O P Judson,et al.  The rise of the individual-based model in ecology. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[78]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  Seed mass and the competition/colonization trade‐off: competitive interactions and spatial patterns in a guild of annual plants , 2004 .

[79]  Marc Garbey,et al.  Large scale parameter study of an individual-based model of clonal plant with volunteer computing , 2011 .

[80]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  Individual-Oriented Approaches to Modeling Ecological Populations and Communities , 1994 .

[81]  V. Grimm,et al.  Competition among plants: Concepts, individual-based modelling approaches, and a proposal for a future research strategy , 2008 .

[82]  G. Jiang,et al.  Importance of clonal plants and plant species diversity in the Northeast China Transect , 2002, Ecological Research.

[83]  H. Kroon,et al.  The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants , 1997 .

[84]  W. Sutherland,et al.  The Foraging Tactics of Plants , 1988 .

[85]  D. Pyke,et al.  Demographic and growth responses of a guerrilla and a phalanx perennial grass in competitive mixtures , 1998 .

[86]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Cooperation and competition in heterogeneous environments: The evolution of resource sharing in clonal plants , 2003 .