A framework for interoperability assessment in crisis management

Abstract It is noticeable the growth of various types of concerns in large centers, whether by citizens or public officials. In that sense, an important dimension is crises management such as in cases of natural disasters. This scenario calls for a task force in an attempt to predict or solve emergencies, especially in managing and integrating public and private spheres, which in turn are centered on public authorities, service providers, citizens, volunteers and systems. In order to allow the exchange of information and joint actions of those involved entities, the fulfillment of interoperability requirements becomes a critical factor to promote improved performance of the actions taken in these situations. Based on the literature and related worldwide initiatives, the main concerns and attributes of crisis management are identified from the perspective of interoperability. Founded on this knowledge a framework that supports a Disaster Response Management System (DRMS) development cycle is proposed focusing on a diagnostic step based on a multi-criteria decision analysis techniques (MCDA) to assess potential interoperability of a public entity or locality. The proposed MCDA method facilitates the specification of integrated solutions for the public sector to meet interoperability requirements in disaster management (DM) scenarios. In this paper the assessment method was based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process technique (AHP), and applied to a company involved in the DM domain, responsible for the information technology infrastructure of a city in the south of Brazil. The findings show the main gaps of the entity under the interoperability perspective, allowing the identification of key areas for improvement of its DM capabilities coherent to the DRMS deployment process.

[1]  Gribaudo Marco,et al.  The financial asset regulation: a new theoretical framework based on Mean field Analysis , 2011 .

[2]  Satyendra Kumar Sharma,et al.  Identification and assessment of supply chain risk: development of AHP model for supply chain risk prioritisation , 2012 .

[3]  R. W. Saaty,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used , 1987 .

[4]  Guy Doumeingts,et al.  European initiatives to develop interoperability of enterprise applications - basic concepts, framework and roadmap , 2003, Annu. Rev. Control..

[5]  Adedeji Badiru,et al.  Handbook of emergency response : a human factors and systems engineering approach , 2013 .

[6]  Grace A. Lewis,et al.  Interoperability in the e-Government Context , 2012 .

[7]  Hervé Pingaud,et al.  Event-driven agility of crisis management collaborative processes , 2012, ISCRAM.

[8]  Hervé Panetto,et al.  Interoperability for Enterprise Software and Applications, Proceedings of the Workshops and the Doctorial Symposium of the Second IFAC/IFIP International Conference: EI2N, WSI and IS-TSPQ 2006 , 2005 .

[9]  Esma Yahia,et al.  Formal measures for semantic interoperability assessment in cooperative enterprise information systems , 2012, Comput. Ind..

[10]  Biswajit Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Use of Information Technology in Emergency and Disaster Management , 2015 .

[11]  Thomas Kirste,et al.  Design Challenges for an Integrated Disaster Management Communication and Information System , 2002 .

[12]  Svein G. Johnsen,et al.  The ATHENA Interoperability Framework , 2007, IESA.

[13]  Phil Blythe,et al.  Evaluating transport technologies for mitigating the impact of emergency events: findings from the SAVE ME Project , 2014 .

[14]  Kenji Tanaka,et al.  Management of marine logistics in the case of emergency or disaster , 2016 .

[15]  Ronald W. Perry,et al.  Incident management systems in disaster management , 2003 .

[16]  Hervé Pingaud,et al.  Interoperability of Information Systems in Crisis Management: Crisis Modeling and Metamodeling , 2008, IESA.

[17]  Sang-Gook Kim,et al.  APPLICATION OF THE AXIOMATIC DESIGN APPROACH TO THE DESIGN OF ARCHITECTURAL SYSTEMS: A LITERATURE REVIEW , 2013 .

[18]  Ovidiu Noran,et al.  Integrating Environmental and Information Systems Management: An Enterprise Architecture Approach , 2009, ISD.

[19]  Nicolas Daclin,et al.  Framework for enterprise interoperability , 2006 .

[20]  Ovidiu Noran,et al.  Towards Improving Information Systems Interoperability in Disaster Management , 2012, ISD.

[21]  Helena Carvalho,et al.  The links between supply chain disturbances and resilience strategies , 2012 .

[22]  Nezih Altay,et al.  OR/MS research in disaster operations management , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Wided Guédria,et al.  A Maturity Model for Enterprise Interoperability , 2009, OTM Workshops.

[24]  Wided Guédria,et al.  On the use of an Interoperability Framework in Coopetition Context , 2011 .

[25]  Badr Elmir,et al.  A Novel Approach for Periodic Assessment of Business Process Interoperability , 2011, ArXiv.

[26]  Chi-Yo Huang,et al.  Key Determinant Derivations for Information Technology Disaster Recovery Site Selection by the Multi-Criterion Decision Making Method , 2015 .

[27]  M. Angela Sasse,et al.  The SAFETRIP Project: improving road safety for passenger vehicles using 2-way satellite communications , 2010 .

[28]  Sai Peck Lee,et al.  Interoperability evaluation models: A systematic review , 2014, Comput. Ind..

[29]  Jean-Paul Bourrières,et al.  Interoperability for Enterprise Software and Applications , 2005 .

[30]  David Chen,et al.  An Approach for Enterprise Interoperability Measurement , 2008, MoDISE-EUS.

[31]  Wided Guédria,et al.  Maturity model for enterprise interoperability , 2015, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[32]  W. Guédria A contribution to enterprise interoperability maturity assessment , 2012 .

[33]  Don Clausing Total quality development : a step-by-step guide to world class concurrent engineering , 1994 .

[34]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  Framework for Analyzing Critical Incident Management Systems (CIMS) , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[35]  Jean-Pierre Lorré,et al.  Mediation Information System Design in a Collaborative SOA Context through a MDD Approach , 2008 .

[36]  Nicolau Reinhard,et al.  The Challenges in Establishing a Government Interoperability Framework: The e-PING Brazilian Case , 2009 .