Using tracer technique to study the flow behavior of surfactant foam.

Surfactant foam was used to remove absorbed hydrocarbons from soils. The nature and extent of the foam pathway decide the efficiency of this technology. The characteristics and behavior of foam flow are difficult to visually observe. In this study, laboratory sandbox experiments were performed to estimate the flow behavior of surfactant foam and thus elucidate the properties and flow behavior of surfactant foam. To quantitatively determine the distribution of foam and evaluate accurately the flow field of foam in the soil, this study designed a special technique, applying micro-scale iron powder as a tracer. The foam generated with 4% (w/v) mixed solution of Span 60 and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) showed an excellent stability and quality, which made it particularly apt for this study. The results indicated that the foam flows through the zone above the clay planes and also flows through the zone between the clay planes. The heterogeneous sand does not inhibit the invasion of foam flow. Moreover, the results of tracer tests and photographs of the foam distributions in sandbox were identical in the behavior of foam flow. This knowledge is valuable for providing insight into the foam remediation of contaminated soil.

[1]  A. R. Kovscek,et al.  Foam Mobility in Heterogeneous Porous Media , 2003 .

[2]  C. Mulligan,et al.  Rhamnolipid Foam Enhanced Remediation of Cadmium and Nickel Contaminated Soil , 2004 .

[3]  Catherine N. Mulligan,et al.  Remediation with surfactant foam of PCP-contaminated soil , 2003 .

[4]  Anthony R. Kovscek,et al.  Trapped Gas Fraction During Steady-State Foam Flow , 2006 .

[5]  Srinivas Veerapaneni,et al.  Generation of stable microbubbles and their transport through porous media , 2001 .

[6]  Gary A. Pope,et al.  Anionic surfactant remediation of soil columns contaminated by nonaqueous phase liquids , 1999 .

[7]  B. Vigon,et al.  Practical considerations in the surfactant-aided mobilization of contaminants in aquifers , 1989 .

[8]  P. Zitha,et al.  Mapping of foam mobility in porous media , 2007 .

[9]  A. Kovscek,et al.  Mechanistic Foam Flow Simulation in Heterogeneous and Multidimensional Porous Media , 1997 .

[10]  T. Gibson,et al.  In Situ Surfactant Washing of Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Oils from a Contaminated Site , 1992 .

[11]  A. Kovscek,et al.  A mechanistic population balance model for transient and steady-state foam flow in Boise sandstone , 1995 .

[12]  M. Yavuz Corapcioglu,et al.  Micromodel Study of Surfactant Foam Remediation of Residual Trichloroethylene , 2000 .

[13]  Chun-Wei Huang,et al.  A laboratory study on foam-enhanced surfactant solution flooding in removing n-pentadecane from contaminated columns , 2000 .

[14]  K. Raney,et al.  Soil Clean Up by in-situ Surfactant Flushing. III. Laboratory Results , 1989 .

[15]  Craig Taylor,et al.  A Controlled Field Test of Surfactant‐Enhanced Aquifer Remediation , 1996 .

[16]  T. Gibson,et al.  Laboratory studies of surfactant-enhanced washing of polychlorinated biphenyl from sandy material , 1991 .

[17]  A. Abdul,et al.  In Situ Surfactant Washing of Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Oils from a Contaminated Field Site: Phase II Pilot Study , 1994 .

[18]  A. Abdul,et al.  Aqueous Surfactant Washing of Residual Oil Contamination from Sandy Soil , 1991 .

[19]  Vipul J. Srivastava,et al.  Foam propagation through soils for enhanced in-situ remediation , 1998 .

[20]  Kurt D. Pennell,et al.  Surfactant-enhanced solubilization of residual dodecane in soil columns. 1. Experimental investigation , 1993 .

[21]  Robert W. Peters,et al.  Surfactant Foam/Bioaugmentation Technology for In Situ Treatment of TCE-DNAPLs , 1998 .