Secretary Problems via Linear Programming

In the classical secretary problem an employer would like to choose the best candidate among n competing candidates that arrive in a random order. In each iteration, one candidate's rank vis-a-vis previously arrived candidates is revealed and the employer makes an irrevocable decision about her selection. This basic concept of n elements arriving in a random order and irrevocable decisions made by an algorithm have been explored extensively over the years, and used for modeling the behavior of many processes. Our main contribution is a new linear programming technique that we introduce as a tool for obtaining and analyzing algorithms for the secretary problem and its variants. The linear program is formulated using judiciously chosen variables and constraints and we show a one-to-one correspondence between algorithms for the secretary problem and feasible solutions to the linear program. Capturing the set of algorithms as a linear polytope holds the following immediate advantages: Computing the optimal algorithm reduces to solving a linear program. Proving an upper bound on the performance of any algorithm reduces to finding a feasible solution to the dual program. Exploring variants of the problem is as simple as adding new constraints, or manipulating the objective function of the linear program. We demonstrate these ideas by exploring some natural variants of the secretary problem. In particular, using our approach, we design optimal secretary algorithms in which the probability of selecting a candidate at any position is equal. We refer to such algorithms as position independent and these algorithms are motivated by the recent applications of secretary problems to online auctions. We also show a family of linear programs that characterize all algorithms that are allowed to choose J candidates and gain profit from the K best candidates. We believe that a linear programming based approach may be very helpful in the context of other variants of the secretary problem.

[1]  Thomas S. Ferguson,et al.  Who Solved the Secretary Problem , 1989 .

[2]  Sourav Chakraborty,et al.  Improved competitive ratio for the matroid secretary problem , 2012, SODA.

[3]  David Lindley,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Decision Theory , 1961 .

[4]  Martin Pál,et al.  Algorithms for Secretary Problems on Graphs and Hypergraphs , 2008, ICALP.

[5]  Michael Dinitz,et al.  Secretary problems: weights and discounts , 2009, SODA.

[6]  Mohit Singh,et al.  Secretary Problems via Linear Programming , 2010, IPCO.

[7]  Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi,et al.  Adaptive limited-supply online auctions , 2004, EC '04.

[8]  Adam Tauman Kalai,et al.  Dueling algorithms , 2011, STOC '11.

[9]  Robert D. Kleinberg A multiple-choice secretary algorithm with applications to online auctions , 2005, SODA '05.

[10]  Nicole Immorlica,et al.  A Knapsack Secretary Problem with Applications , 2007, APPROX-RANDOM.

[11]  Jan Vondrák,et al.  On Variants of the Matroid Secretary Problem , 2011, ESA.

[12]  Evangelos Markakis,et al.  Greedy facility location algorithms analyzed using dual fitting with factor-revealing LP , 2002, JACM.

[13]  P. Freeman The Secretary Problem and its Extensions: A Review , 1983 .

[14]  Aranyak Mehta,et al.  AdWords and generalized on-line matching , 2005, 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'05).

[15]  Mohit Singh,et al.  Incentives in Online Auctions via Linear Programming , 2010, WINE.

[16]  Yossi Azar,et al.  Reducing truth-telling online mechanisms to online optimization , 2003, STOC '03.

[17]  Nicole Immorlica,et al.  Online auctions and generalized secretary problems , 2008, SECO.

[18]  Joseph Naor,et al.  Online Primal-Dual Algorithms for Maximizing Ad-Auctions Revenue , 2007, ESA.

[19]  Allan Borodin,et al.  Online computation and competitive analysis , 1998 .

[20]  Nicole Immorlica,et al.  Matroids, secretary problems, and online mechanisms , 2007, SODA '07.

[21]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  An improved approximation ratio for the minimum latency problem , 1996, SODA '96.

[22]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Competitive analysis of incentive compatible on-line auctions , 2004, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[23]  Silvio Lattanzi,et al.  Hiring a secretary from a poset , 2011, EC '11.