An Analysis of Two Response Styles: True Responding and Item Endorsement 1

A true or false response to an item like &dquo;I usually help old ladies across the street,&dquo; is clearly the result of a variety of determinants. In this case, the respondent may in fact usually help old ladies across the street, and be high on a nurturance dimension. However, he may also tend (a) to manifest a general tendency to respond true to test items, (b) to endorse test items as descriptive of himself, and (c) to respond consistently in a desirable or an undesirable direction. In other words, his response may be determined by the substance or content of the item, as well as by aspects of its form, such as ambiguity and salience, positive as opposed to negative wording, and desirability scale value. The effects of such aspects of item form, interacting with subject characteristics and manifesting themselves as response styles (Jackson and Messick, 1958, 1962), were the primary focus of the present investigation.

[1]  D. Jackson,et al.  Content and style in personality assessment. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  N. Anderson Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  D. Jackson,et al.  HOMOGENEOUS DIMENSIONS OF PERSONALITY SCALE CONTENT. , 1968, Multivariate behavioral research.

[4]  D. Jackson,et al.  DESIRABILITY JUDGMENTS AND SELF‐REPORTS AS PREDICTORS OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR1 , 1967 .

[5]  D. Jackson Book Reviews : Balanced Scales, Item Overlap, and the Stables of Augeas. , 1967 .

[6]  J. Block Book Reviews : Remarks on Jackson's "Review" of Block's Challenge of Response Sets. , 1967 .

[7]  D. Jackson Book Reviews : The Challenge of Response Sets by Jack Block. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965. Pp. x + 142. $5.00 , 1967 .

[8]  S. Messick THE PSYCHOLOGY OF ACQUIESCENCE: AN INTERPRETATION OF RESEARCH EVIDENCE1 , 1966 .

[9]  L. G. Rorer,et al.  Acquiescence and the vanishing variance component. , 1965, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  L. G. Rorer,et al.  Acquiescence in the MMPI? , 1965 .

[11]  E. Lichtenstein,et al.  ACQUIESCENCE AND THE MMPI: AN ITEM REVERSAL APPROACH. , 1965, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[12]  L. G. Rorer,et al.  THE GREAT RESPONSE-STYLE MYTH. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  J. D. Martin Acquiescence—Measurement and Theory* , 1964 .

[14]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  An MMPI Item Characteristic Deck1, 2 , 1964 .

[15]  D. Jackson,et al.  Response styles onthe MMPI: comparison of clinical and normal samples. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[16]  C. Hanley The "Difficulty" of a Personality Inventory Item , 1962 .

[17]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  Strategic, method, and stylistic variance in the MMPI. , 1962, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  D. Peabody,et al.  Attitude content and agreement set in scales of authoritarianism, dogmatism, anti-semitism, and economic conservatism. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[19]  D. Jackson,et al.  Equivalence Range, Acquiescence, and Overgeneralization1 , 1961 .

[20]  D. Jackson,et al.  Acquiescence and Desirability As Response Determinants On the MMPI , 1961 .

[21]  D. Jackson,et al.  Acquiescence and the factorial interpretation of the MMPI. , 1960, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  Louis Guttman,et al.  What Lies Ahead for Factor Analysis? , 1958 .

[23]  L. Cronbach Further Evidence on Response Sets and Test Design , 1950 .

[24]  L. Cronbach Response Sets and Test Validity , 1946 .

[25]  Lee J. Cronbach,et al.  Studies of acquiescence as a factor in the true-false test. , 1942 .

[26]  P. Bentler Semantic Space is (Approximately) Bipolar , 1969 .

[27]  Jack Block,et al.  The challenge of response sets , 1965 .

[28]  D. Jackson,et al.  CONFORMITY, VERIDICALITY, AND SELF-ESTEEM. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.