A number of transonic airfoils, designed using differing approaches, are evaluated over a
wide range of operating conditions, using a tool for generating aerodynamic performance
maps. Details of key performance boundaries are also extracted, including drag divergence
and separation onset. The aerodynamic performance maps and boundaries, which are based
upon extensive use of a rapid 2D CFD tool, are first demonstrated on an existing airfoil, for
which the design condition is known and for which experimental data is available.
Aerodynamic maps are then presented for a series of airfoils which are designed using a
sonic plateau, inverse design approach. Further maps are presented for airfoils designed
using single-point and multi-point optimization. The impact of the alternative design
approaches is studied, using the performance maps and the resulting characteristics of the
performance boundaries. In particular, the trade-off between drag divergence and the onset
of separation, combined with viscous and wave drag development, is presented. The study
provides some insights into the challenge of achieving a well posed optimization formulation
for transonic airfoil design.
[1]
Mark Drela,et al.
Pros & Cons of Airfoil Optimization
,
1998
.
[2]
Beckett Yx Zhou,et al.
Airfoil Optimization Using Practical Aerodynamic Design Requirements
,
2010
.
[3]
David W. Zingg,et al.
Aerodynamic Optimization Under a Range of Operating Conditions
,
2006
.
[4]
Huyse Luc,et al.
Free-form airfoil shape optimization under uncertainty using maximum expected value and second-order second-moment strategies
,
2001
.
[5]
Wu Li,et al.
Profile Optimization Method for Robust Airfoil Shape Optimization in Viscous Flow
,
2003
.
[6]
D. P. Young,et al.
Study Based on the AIAA Aerodynamic Design Optimization Discussion Group Test Cases
,
2015
.
[7]
Joseph A. Schetz,et al.
Full Configuration Drag Estimation
,
2009
.
[8]
Huyse Luc,et al.
Robust airfoil optimization to achieve consistent drag reduction over a mach range
,
2001
.