On the Robustness of Residual Minimization for Constructing POD-Based Reduced-Order CFD Models

Residual minimization is often used in constructing nonlinear reduced-order models (ROMs) for engineering computations. In this paper, it is shown that for unsteady CFD applications, the performance of this method strongly depends on the chosen definition of the residual. To this effect, two common residual definitions are considered first. One is the standard residual associated with the governing high-dimensional discrete equations. The other is obtained by scaling the standard residual with the inverses of the volumes of the cells of the given CFD mesh. This second definition of the residual is common in high-dimensional CFD computations as it maximizes the accuracy of the computed results in the boundary layer regions where the spatial discretization is the finest. Using the proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) method for constructing a reduced-order basis and residual minimization for computing a reduced-order approximation of a CFD solution using this basis, it is shown that both aforementioned residual definitions lead to nonlinear CFD ROMs that may perform poorly. For this reason, a new definition of the residual is proposed for the purpose of nonlinear model reduction. Unlike the two previous definitions, this one is not biased by mesh spacing considerations. More importantly, using Burger’s equation as a model CFD problem with shocks, and the Ahmed body problem as a representative of three-dimensional turbulent flow problems, the proposed definition of the residual is shown to lead to nonlinear ROMs that perform significantly better than their counterparts based of the first two aforementioned definitions of the CFD residual.

[1]  Lisa J. Cowles,et al.  High Reynolds number , 1987 .

[2]  Gunther Ramm,et al.  Some salient features of the time - averaged ground vehicle wake , 1984 .

[3]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Nonlinear Model Reduction for CFD Problems Using Local Reduced Order Bases , 2012 .

[4]  C. Farhat,et al.  On the Stability of Reduced-Order Linearized Computational Fluid Dynamics Models Based on POD and Galerkin Projection: Descriptor vs Non-Descriptor Forms , 2014 .

[5]  Jacob K. White,et al.  Model order reduction for nonlinear dynamical systems based on trajectory piecewise-linear approximations , 2006 .

[6]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  The GNAT method for nonlinear model reduction: Effective implementation and application to computational fluid dynamics and turbulent flows , 2012, J. Comput. Phys..

[7]  B. R. Noack,et al.  A Novel Model Order Reduction Approach for Navier-Stokes Equations at High Reynolds Number , 2012, 1211.1720.

[8]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Toward Real-Time Computational-Fluid-Dynamics-Based Aeroelastic Computations Using a Database of Reduced-Order Information , 2010 .

[9]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  On the solution of three-dimensional inverse obstacle acoustic scattering problems by a regularized Newton method , 2002 .

[10]  Karen Willcox,et al.  Parametric reduced-order models for probabilistic analysis of unsteady aerodynamic applications , 2007 .

[11]  C. Farhat,et al.  Efficient non‐linear model reduction via a least‐squares Petrov–Galerkin projection and compressive tensor approximations , 2011 .

[12]  Jeffrey P. Thomas,et al.  Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Technique for Transonic Unsteady Aerodynamic Flows , 2000 .

[13]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Adaptation of Aeroelastic Reduced-Order Models and Application to an F-16 Configuration , 2007 .

[14]  C. Farhat,et al.  Interpolation Method for Adapting Reduced-Order Models and Application to Aeroelasticity , 2008 .

[15]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Aeroelastic Analysis of F-16 and F-18/A Configurations Using Adapted CFD-Based Reduced-Order Models , 2007 .

[16]  Juan J. Alonso,et al.  Airfoil design optimization using reduced order models based on proper orthogonal decomposition , 2000 .