Assessment of river health: accounting for perturbation pathways in physical and ecological space

Summary 1. A full understanding of changes to river ecosystem structure and functioning along the continuum from relatively pristine to profoundly perturbed requires knowledge of physical, chemical and ecological properties at many spatial and temporal scales. Perturbations may span broad spatio-temporal scales or be spatially and temporally discrete. 2. The relevant scale for study depends on the manner in which perturbations move through two kinds of pathways – through the physical space of the catchment hierarchy and through the ecological space of river food webs. Different kinds of perturbation (e.g. inputs of sediment, nitrogen or phosphorus, changes to shading or discharge) vary in the degree and manner in which they are propagated downstream and through food webs. 3. The fundamental importance of disturbance regimes and refugia to river health is now clear and managers need to take this into account when devising river management schemes. 4. A comparison of the physics, chemistry and ecology of streams in catchments of native tussock and exotic pasture grassland in New Zealand serves to emphasize (i) the extreme complexity of interacting factors resulting from land use change, (ii) the importance of disturbance regime (not encapsulated in biotic indices) and biogeographic patterns (usually unmeasured) in determining ecosystem structure and functioning, and (iii) the lack of concordance between any single index of health and various fundamental features of ecosystem functioning. 5. Practical considerations limit most evaluations of river health to a small suite of indices, though it is important that researchers continue to evaluate the spatial, temporal and biological limitations of these indices. The vagaries of history and geography (extinction and colonization trajectories in relation to natural disturbance regimes) and the complexity of interacting physical, chemical and ecological responses to perturbation suggest that multi-scale, multi-temporal studies of river function offer the best opportunity to evaluate river health.

[1]  J. Webster,et al.  Export of fine organic particles from headwater streams: Effects of season, extreme discharges, and invertebrate manipulation , 1991 .

[2]  Colin R. Townsend,et al.  The Patch Dynamics Concept of Stream Community Ecology , 1989, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[3]  S. Fisher,et al.  Parafluvial Nitrogen Dynamics in a Desert Stream Ecosystem , 1994, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[4]  P. Lester,et al.  Effects of riparian willow trees (Salix fragilis) on macroinvertebrate densities in two small Central Otago, New Zealand, streams , 1994 .

[5]  H. B. N. Hynes,et al.  The stream and its valley , 1975 .

[6]  William E. Dietrich,et al.  Hydraulic Food-Chain ModelsAn approach to the study of food-web dynamics in large rivers , 1995 .

[7]  C. Townsend,et al.  Characterising food‐webs in two New Zealand streams , 1998 .

[8]  Charles P. Hawkins,et al.  Role of refugia in recovery from disturbances: Modern fragmented and disconnected river systems , 1990 .

[9]  J. Meyer,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS AND SUCCESSIONAL STATE ON DISSOLVED ORGANIC CARBON EXPORT FROM FORESTED WATERSHEDS , 1983 .

[10]  J. Connell Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. , 1978, Science.

[11]  Impacts of an introduced predatory fish on mayfly grazing in New Zealand streams , 1995 .

[12]  Todd A. Crowl,et al.  The relationship between land use and physicochemistry, food resources and macroinvertebrate communities in tributaries of the Taieri River, New Zealand: a hierarchically scaled approach , 1997 .

[13]  J. Allan,et al.  The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales , 1997 .

[14]  B. C. Patten,et al.  Effects of Watershed Perturbation on Stream Potassium and Calcium Dynamics , 1979 .

[15]  Arthur V. Brown,et al.  The Role of Disturbance in Stream Ecology , 1988, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[16]  J. Quinn,et al.  Characterisation and classification of benthic invertebrate communities in 88 New Zealand rivers in relation to environmental factors , 1990 .

[17]  J. Ward,et al.  The Four-Dimensional Nature of Lotic Ecosystems , 1989, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[18]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Biological water quality assessment of running waters based on macroinvertebrate communities: history and present status in Europe. , 1989, Environmental pollution.

[19]  C. Townsend,et al.  Fragmented population structure in a native New Zealand fish: an effect of introduced brown trout? , 1991 .

[20]  C. Pringle Exploring How Disturbance Is Transmitted Upstream: Going against the Flow , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[21]  Christine M. Smith Riparian pasture retirement effects on sediment, phosphorus, and nitrogen in channellised surface run‐off from pastures , 1989 .

[22]  Michael T. Brett,et al.  Consumer Versus Resource Control in Freshwater Pelagic Food Webs , 1997, Science.

[23]  A. Huryn,et al.  Interannual variation in discharge controls ecosystem metabolism along a grassland river continuum , 1996 .

[24]  Raymond L. Lindeman The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology , 1942 .

[25]  Colin R. Townsend,et al.  Effects of agricultural development on processing of tussock leaf litter in high country New Zealand streams , 1994 .

[26]  J. Ward,et al.  Interstitial fauna communities of the hyporheic and adjacent groundwater biotopes of a Colorado mountain stream , 1986 .

[27]  Mike R. Scarsbrook,et al.  Quantifying Disturbance in Streams: Alternative Measures of Disturbance in Relation to Macroinvertebrate Species Traits and Species Richness , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[28]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[29]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Channel Processes, Classification, and Response , 2000 .

[30]  Jill Lancaster,et al.  Characterizing In-stream Flow Refugia , 1993 .

[31]  M. Power,et al.  Effects of Disturbance on River Food Webs , 1996, Science.

[32]  Colin R. Townsend,et al.  Invasion biology and ecological impacts of brown trout Salmo trutta in New Zealand , 1996 .

[33]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Implications of Streamflow Variability and Predictability for Lotic Community Structure: A Regional Analysis of Streamflow Patterns , 1989 .

[34]  Stuart E. Bunn,et al.  Dispersal and Recruitment in Streams: Evidence from Genetic Studies , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[35]  J. Stanford,et al.  An Ecosystem Perspective of Alluvial Rivers: Connectivity and the Hyporheic Corridor , 1993, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[36]  A. Huryn,et al.  Longitudinal patterns of organic matter transport and turnover along a New Zealand grassland river , 1997 .

[37]  D. Montgomery River management: What's best on the banks? , 1997, Nature.

[38]  Donald R. Strong,et al.  ARE TROPHIC CASCADES ALL WET? DIFFERENTIATION AND DONOR-CONTROL IN SPECIOSE ECOSYSTEMS' , 1992 .

[39]  C. Townsend Concepts in river ecology : pattern and process in the catchment hierarchy , 1996 .

[40]  John D. Stark,et al.  Performance of the macroinvertebrate community index: effects of sampling method, sample replication, water depth, current velocity, and substratum on index values , 1993 .

[41]  C. Townsend,et al.  Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems , 1994 .

[42]  J. Stark SQMCI: A biotic index for freshwater macroinvertebrate coded‐abundance data , 1998 .

[43]  James R. Karr,et al.  Assessing Invertebrate Responses to Human Activities: Evaluating Alternative Approaches , 1996, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[44]  Peter B. Bayley,et al.  Understanding Large River-Floodplain EcosystemsSignificant economic advantages and increased biodiversity and stability would result from restoration of impaired systems , 1995 .

[45]  M. Winterbourn,et al.  Are New Zealand stream ecosystems really different , 1981 .

[46]  G. Scrimgeour,et al.  Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Integrity: Problems and Potential Solutions , 1996, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[47]  V. Resh Variability, accuracy, and taxonomic costs of rapid assessment approaches in benthic macroinvertebrate biomonitoring , 1994 .

[48]  M. Molles Recovery of a Stream Invertebrate Community from Flash a Flash Flood in Tesuque Creek, New Mexico , 1985 .

[49]  J. Webster,et al.  Experimental studies of physical factors affecting seston transport in streams1 , 1987 .

[50]  C. Townsend,et al.  Community‐Wide Consequences of Trout Introduction in New Zealand Streams , 1994 .

[51]  Robert C. Petersen,et al.  Developments in Stream Ecosystem Theory , 1985 .

[52]  Mike R. Scarsbrook,et al.  Species traits in relation to temporal and spatial heterogeneity in streams: a test of habitat templet theory , 1997 .

[53]  P. Hatcher,et al.  Natural photolysis by ultraviolet irradiance of recalcitrant dissolved organic matter to simple substrates for rapidbacterial metabolism , 1995 .

[54]  J. Meyer Stream Health: Incorporating the Human Dimension to Advance Stream Ecology , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[55]  Nancy B. Grimm,et al.  TEMPORAL SUCCESSION IN A DESERT STREAM ECOSYSTEM FOLLOWING FLASH FLOODING , 1982 .

[56]  R. Wilcock Agricultural run-off: a source of water pollution in New Zealand? , 1986 .

[57]  M. Delong,et al.  The riverine productivity model: an heuristic view of carbon sources and organic processing in large river ecosystems , 1994 .