A Novel Hybrid Fuzzy DEA-Fuzzy ARAS Method for Prioritizing High-Performance Innovation-Oriented Human Resource Practices in High Tech SME’s

[1]  Yiyang Sun,et al.  Adoption of high‐performance work systems in small and medium‐sized enterprises , 2021, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources.

[2]  U. Daellenbach,et al.  High performance work systems and innovation in New Zealand SMEs: testing firm size and competitive environment effects , 2021, The International Journal of Human Resource Management.

[3]  M. P. McGuire,et al.  Integration and comparison of multi-criteria decision making methods in safe route planner , 2020, Expert Syst. Appl..

[4]  Jalil Heidary Dahooie,et al.  A multi-attribute framework for the selection of high-performance work systems: the hybrid DEMATEL-MABAC model , 2020, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja.

[5]  Sasan Barak,et al.  Outsourcing modelling using a novel interval-valued fuzzy quantitative strategic planning matrix (QSPM) and multiple criteria decision-making (MCDMs) , 2020, International Journal of Production Economics.

[6]  Daoping Wang,et al.  The influence of technology innovation on SME performance through environmental sustainability practices in Kenya , 2020 .

[7]  J. Arthur,et al.  Which Way to High Performance? Comparing Performance Effects of High-Performance Work System Components in Small- to Medium-Sized Establishments , 2019 .

[8]  C. Atkinson,et al.  Guanxi and high performance work systems in China: evidence from a state-owned enterprise , 2019 .

[9]  Meng Xi,et al.  The Role of employees’ perceptions of HPWS in the HPWS-performance relationship: A multilevel perspective , 2019, Asia Pacific Journal of Management.

[10]  Gyunghyun Choi,et al.  Exploring data envelopment analysis for measuring collaborated innovation efficiency of small and medium-sized enterprises in Korea , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Jim Andersén,et al.  Are high-performance work systems (HPWS) appreciated by everyone? The role of management position and gender on the relationship between HPWS and affective commitment , 2019, Employee Relations: The International Journal.

[12]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Strategic alignment of IT and human resources management in manufacturing SMEs , 2019, Employee Relations: The International Journal.

[13]  Hoa Do.  Interplay between HPWS and Innovation: Evidence from Vietnamese Small Businesses , 2019, Academy of Management Proceedings.

[14]  H. Shipton,et al.  High-performance work systems and innovation in Vietnamese small firms , 2019, International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship.

[15]  K. Shahzad,et al.  Unpacking the relationship between high-performance work systems and innovation performance in SMEs , 2019, Personnel Review.

[16]  F. Cooke,et al.  Mapping the relationships between high-performance work systems, employee resilience and engagement: a study of the banking industry in China , 2019 .

[17]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  An improved fuzzy MULTIMOORA approach for multi-criteria decision making based on objective weighting method (CCSD) and its application to technological forecasting method selection , 2019, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[18]  David P. Lepak,et al.  A Systematic Review of Human Resource Management Systems and Their Measurement , 2019, Journal of Management.

[19]  Sasan Barak,et al.  A novel hybrid fuzzy DEA-Fuzzy MADM method for airlines safety evaluation , 2018, Journal of Air Transport Management.

[20]  Lucía Muñoz-Pascual,et al.  Antecedents to innovation performance in SMEs: A mixed methods approach , 2018, Journal of Business Research.

[21]  Ji-Hoon Park.  Open innovation of small and medium-sized enterprises and innovation efficiency , 2018 .

[22]  Moon-Koo Kim,et al.  Factors influencing innovation capability of small and medium-sized enterprises in Korean manufacturing sector: facilitators, barriers and moderators , 2018, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[23]  K. Shahzad,et al.  Exploring the role of employee voice between high-performance work system and organizational innovation in small and medium enterprises , 2017 .

[24]  G. Saridakis,et al.  Human resource practices, employee attitudes and small firm performance , 2017 .

[25]  Dong Liu,et al.  Human Resource Systems, Employee Creativity, and Firm Innovation: The Moderating Role of Firm Ownership , 2017 .

[26]  Alireza Sotoudeh-Anvari,et al.  A comprehensive MCDM-based approach using TOPSIS, COPRAS and DEA as an auxiliary tool for material selection problems , 2017 .

[27]  H. Shipton,et al.  HRM and innovation: looking across levels , 2017 .

[28]  Hannele Seeck,et al.  A literature review on HRM and innovation – taking stock and future directions , 2017 .

[29]  H. Biemans,et al.  Fostering Entrepreneurial Learning On‐the‐Job: evidence from innovative small and medium‐sized companies in Europe , 2016 .

[30]  D. Pittino,et al.  Are high performance work practices really necessary in family SMEs? : An analysis of the impact on employee retention , 2016 .

[31]  N. Malys,et al.  Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability , 2016 .

[32]  R. Nowacki,et al.  Entrepreneurship and innovativeness of small and medium-sized construction enterprises , 2016 .

[33]  Juan Carlos Bou Llusar,et al.  High‐performance work systems and workplace performance in small, medium‐sized and large firms , 2015 .

[34]  K. Cafferkey,et al.  Explaining the black box: HPWS and organisational climate , 2015 .

[35]  J. Ivars,et al.  The effect of high performance work systems on small and medium size enterprises , 2015 .

[36]  Anup Kumar,et al.  Dynamic performance assessment of a supply chain process: A case from pharmaceutical supply chain in India , 2015, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[37]  Víctor G. Alfaro García,et al.  A Fuzzy Logic Approach Towards Innovation Measurement , 2015 .

[38]  Xiaoyun Wang,et al.  Determinants of high‐performance work systems in small and medium‐sized private enterprises in China , 2015 .

[39]  M. Tavana,et al.  A hybrid fuzzy MCDM method for measuring the performance of publicly held pharmaceutical companies , 2015, Ann. Oper. Res..

[40]  Tim Morris,et al.  How do high performance work systems influence organizational innovation in professional service firms , 2015 .

[41]  Wenlian Gao,et al.  Innovation Efficiency, Global Diversification, and Firm Value , 2014 .

[42]  Manish Godse,et al.  Towards a holistic enterprise innovation performance measurement system , 2014 .

[43]  Hakyeon Lee,et al.  Benchmarking of service quality with data envelopment analysis , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[44]  Song-Kyoo Kim,et al.  Explicit Design of Innovation Performance Metrics by Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Expansion , 2014, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci..

[45]  Song Chang,et al.  Do high-commitment work systems affect creativity? A multilevel combinational approach to employee creativity. , 2014, The Journal of applied psychology.

[46]  K. Hoque,et al.  The adoption of high performance work practices in small businesses: the influence of markets, business characteristics and HR expertise , 2014 .

[47]  S. Avasilcai,et al.  Measuring the Performance of Innovation Processes: A Balanced Scorecard Perspective☆ , 2014 .

[48]  Hadi Shirouyehzad,et al.  Analysis of the Efficiency R&D Projects base on BSC-DEA Approach with Restrictions on Weight of Inputs and Outputs - TI Journals , 2013 .

[49]  Hye-Seon Moon.  The relative efficiency analysis of innovation activities with uncertainty: The case of Korean electronic equipment industry , 2013 .

[50]  Claudio Cruz-Cázares,et al.  You can’t manage right what you can’t measure well: Technological innovation efficiency☆ , 2013 .

[51]  Nauman Bin Ali,et al.  Towards innovation measurement in the software industry , 2013, J. Syst. Softw..

[52]  F. Jolai,et al.  An integrated fuzzy DEA-fuzzy AHP approach: a new model for ranking decision-making units , 2013 .

[53]  M. Gilman,et al.  National context as a predictor of high-performance work system effectiveness in small-to-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): a UK–French comparative analysis , 2013 .

[54]  David P. Lepak,et al.  How Does Human Resource Management Influence Organizational Outcomes? A Meta-analytic Investigation of Mediating Mechanisms , 2012 .

[55]  Anne-Laure Mention,et al.  Intellectual Capital, Innovation and Performance: a Systematic Review of the Literature , 2012 .

[56]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Measuring the Efficiency of China's Regional Innovation Systems: Application of Network Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) , 2012 .

[57]  T. Pedersen,et al.  Why a Central Network Position Isn't Enough: The Role of Motivation and Ability for Knowledge Sharing in Employee Networks , 2011 .

[58]  Y. Gong,et al.  Promoting Innovation in Hospitality Companies through Human Resource Management Practices , 2011 .

[59]  C. Smallman,et al.  The effects of cultural factors on innovation in a Thai SME , 2011 .

[60]  Adel Hatami-Marbini,et al.  A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy data envelopment analysis literature: Two decades in the making , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[61]  L. Solari,et al.  High performance work systems, technological innovations and firm performance in SME: evidences from Italy , 2011 .

[62]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  Unlocking the black box: exploring the link between high-performance work systems and performance. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[63]  Chih-Hung Wu,et al.  Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[64]  Abdelwahab Ait Razouk,et al.  High-performance work systems and performance of French small- and medium-sized enterprises: examining causal order , 2011 .

[65]  Amit Kumar,et al.  A new method for solving fully fuzzy linear programming problems , 2011 .

[66]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARAS‐F). Case study: The analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location , 2010 .

[67]  Alistair Moffat,et al.  A similarity measure for indefinite rankings , 2010, TOIS.

[68]  James Guthrie,et al.  The impact of diversity and equality management on firm performance: Beyond high performance work systems , 2010 .

[69]  L. Sels,et al.  Interrelationships between human capital, HRM and innovation in Belgian start-ups aiming at an innovation strategy , 2010 .

[70]  Nieves L. Diaz-Diaz,et al.  Human resource management and innovation in the Canary Islands: an ultra-peripheral region of the European Union , 2010 .

[71]  Marina Apaydin,et al.  A Multi-Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2010 .

[72]  M. Martinsuo,et al.  Management Control and Strategic Renewal in the Front End of Innovation , 2009 .

[73]  R. Harrington,et al.  The product innovation process of quick‐service restaurant chains , 2009 .

[74]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[75]  C.-J. Chen,et al.  Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance: the mediating role of knowledge management capacity , 2009 .

[76]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years , 2008 .

[77]  Shuo-Yan Chou,et al.  A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[78]  Daniel Jiménez-Jiménez,et al.  Could HRM support organizational innovation? , 2008 .

[79]  Risto Rajala,et al.  Social capital in the growth of science-and-technology-based SMEs , 2008 .

[80]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  Human resource practices and organizational commitment: A deeper examination , 2008, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources.

[81]  D. Teece.  Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[82]  M. Boden.  Creativity and Reason in Cognitive Development , 2007 .

[83]  Anil Verma,et al.  Globalization, Human Resource Practices and Innovation: Recent Evidence from the Canadian Workplace and Employee Survey , 2007 .

[84]  I. Stone,et al.  Exploring the potential of high performance work systems in SMEs , 2007 .

[85]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Managing Invention and Innovation , 2007 .

[86]  S. Marlow,et al.  Human resource management in smaller firms: A contradiction in terms? , 2006 .

[87]  A. R. Shapiro.  Measuring Innovation: Beyond Revenue From New Products , 2006 .

[88]  Joaquín Alegre,et al.  A measurement scale for product innovation performance , 2006 .

[89]  Jacinto González-Pachón,et al.  An analysis of productive efficiency and innovation activity using DEA: An application to Spain's wood-based industry , 2006 .

[90]  James G. Combs,et al.  HOW MUCH DO HIGH-PERFORMANCE WORK PRACTICES MATTER? A META-ANALYSIS OF THEIR EFFECTS ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE , 2006 .

[91]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Knowledge Exchange and Combination: The Role of Human Resource Practices in the Performance of High-Technology Firms , 2006 .

[92]  R. Weisberg.  Expertise and Reason in Creative Thinking: Evidence from Case Studies and the Laboratory , 2006 .

[93]  Paul Osterman,et al.  The Wage Effects of High Performance Work Organization in Manufacturing , 2006 .

[94]  Daniel Jiménez-Jiménez,et al.  Innovation and human resource management fit: an empirical study , 2005 .

[95]  Jan de Leede,et al.  Innovation and HRM: Towards an Integrated Framework , 2005 .

[96]  Chung-Ming Lau,et al.  The HR system, organizational culture, and product innovation , 2004 .

[97]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Effects of Personal and Contextual Characteristics on Creativity: Where Should We Go from Here? , 2004 .

[98]  J. Godard.  A Critical Assessment of the High-Performance Paradigm , 2004 .

[99]  Klas Eric Soderquist,et al.  Use and impact of performance measurement results in R&D and NPD: an exploratory study , 2004 .

[100]  Shu-Cherng Fang,et al.  Fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA): a possibility approach , 2003, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[101]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? , 2003 .

[102]  H. Scarbrough.  Knowledge management, HRM and the innovation process , 2003 .

[103]  Jaana Kekäläinen,et al.  Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques , 2002, TOIS.

[104]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[105]  S. Taggar.  Individual Creativity and Group Ability to Utilize Individual Creative Resources: A Multilevel Model , 2002 .

[106]  C. Edquist,et al.  Innovation and Employment: Process Versus Product Innovation , 2001 .

[107]  R. Delbridge,et al.  Linking innovative potential to SME performance: an assessment of enterprises in industrial South Wales , 2001 .

[108]  A. Kalleberg,et al.  Book Review , 2001 .

[109]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study , 2000 .

[110]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Fuzzy efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[111]  Jaana Kekäläinen,et al.  IR evaluation methods for retrieving highly relevant documents , 2000, SIGIR Forum.

[112]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units , 2000 .

[113]  Joeseph Sarkis,et al.  A methodological framework for evaluating environmentally conscious manufacturing programs , 1999 .

[114]  Jian Ma,et al.  A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[115]  L. Zadeh.  Fuzzy sets , 1996 .

[116]  Pao-Long Chang,et al.  A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method for technology transfer strategy selection in biotechnology , 1994 .

[117]  Damodar Y. Golhar,et al.  HRM Practices in Large and Small Manufacturing Firms: A Comparative Study , 1994 .

[118]  Rene Cordero,et al.  The measurement of innovation performance in the firm: An overview , 1990 .

[119]  S. Jackson,et al.  Linking Competitive Strategies with Human Resource Management Practices , 1987 .

[120]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  A procedure for ordering fuzzy subsets of the unit interval , 1981, Inf. Sci..

[121]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[122]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  A novel dynamic credit risk evaluation method using data envelopment analysis with common weights and combination of multi-attribute decision-making methods , 2021, Comput. Oper. Res..

[123]  Ø. Moen,et al.  The organizational climate for psychological safety: Associations with SMEs' innovation capabilities and innovation performance , 2020 .

[124]  Juan A. Sanchis‐Llopis,et al.  The relationship between types of innovation and SMEs’ performance: a multi-dimensional empirical assessment , 2019, Eurasian Business Review.

[125]  Qinyang Li,et al.  Regional technological innovation and green economic efficiency based on DEA model and fuzzy evaluation , 2019, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[126]  Hao Wu,et al.  Risk assessment of rockburst via an extended MABAC method under fuzzy environment , 2019, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology.

[127]  M. Heffernan,et al.  between Climate Performance: Evidence , 2017 .

[128]  Minna Saunila.  Is innovation performance measurement beneficial for performance in services , 2017 .

[129]  Luís Filippe Serpe,et al.  A comparative analysis between clustered and non-clustered companies using innovation indicators , 2015 .

[130]  Viliam Lendel,et al.  Proposal of Evaluation System for Successful Application of Innovation Strategy through a Set of Indicators , 2015 .

[131]  Ing-Long Wu,et al.  Organizational applications of IT innovation and firm's competitive performance , 2015 .

[132]  S. Meysam Mousavi,et al.  Soft computing-based preference selection index method for human resource management , 2014, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[133]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  A new benchmarking approach in Cold Chain , 2012 .

[134]  Clint Chadwick,et al.  Human Resources, Human Resource Management, and the Competitive Advantage of Firms: Toward a More Comprehensive Model of Causal Linkages , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[135]  Jeremy Dawson,et al.  HRM as a predictor of innovation , 2006 .

[136]  C. Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[137]  L. Zadeh.  Fuzzy Sets , 1965, Inf. Control..