Blockchain in the built environment and construction industry: A systematic review, conceptual models and practical use cases

Abstract The construction industry is facing many challenges including low productivity, poor regulation and compliance, lack of adequate collaboration and information sharing, and poor payment practices. Advances in distributed ledger technologies (DLT), also referred to as Blockchain, are increasingly investigated as one of the constituents in the digital transformation of the construction industry and its response to these challenges. The overarching aim of this study was to analyse the current state of DLT in the built environment and the construction sector with a view to developing a coherent approach to support its adoption specifically in the construction industry. Three objectives were established to achieve this: (a) to present the first state-of-the-art and literature review on DLT in the built environment and construction industry providing a consolidated view of the applications explored and potential use cases that could support disruption of the construction industry. Seven use-categories were identified: [1] Smart Energy, [2] Smart Cities & the Sharing Economy, [3] Smart Government, [4] Smart Homes, [5] Intelligent Transport, [6] BIM and Construction Management, and [7] Business Models and Organisational Structures; (b) to propose a framework for implementation composed of two conceptual models (i.e. the DLT Four-Dimensional Model, and the DLT Actors Model), developed according to extended socio-technical systems theory and including four dimensions (technical, social, process and policy), to support the development of DLT-based solutions that are adequate to the challenges faced by the construction industry. The DLT Four-Dimensional Model and the DLT Actors Model contribute to improve the understanding of the concepts involved when discussing DLT applications in construction and represent flexible, adaptable and scalable knowledge constructs and foundations that can be used for various further investigations; and (c) to appraise three specific use cases (i.e. Project Bank Accounts, regulation and compliance, and a single shared-access BIM model) as potential areas for DLT through the application of a decision support tool. The results show that Project Bank Accounts (PBAs) and regulation and compliance are candidate areas for DLT applications and warrant further attention. However, for the third use case (i.e. single shared-access BIM model) DLT are still insufficiently developed at this time. The research shows that there is real potential for DLT to support digitalisation in the construction industry and enable solutions to many of its challenges. However, there needs to be further investigation of the readiness of the industry, its organisations and processes, and to evaluate what changes need to occur before implementation can be successful. Further investigations will include the development of a roadmap process incorporating the four dimensions to evaluate readiness across a series of use cases for the construction industry.

[1]  Elyes Ben Hamida,et al.  Blockchain for Enterprise: Overview, Opportunities and Challenges , 2017, ICWMC 2017.

[2]  MyungSan Jun,et al.  Blockchain government - a next form of infrastructure for the twenty-first century , 2018 .

[3]  S. Ammous,et al.  Blockchain Technology: What is it Good for? , 2016 .

[4]  Roy Woodhead,et al.  Digital construction: From point solutions to IoT ecosystem , 2018, Automation in Construction.

[5]  Aarni Heiskanen,et al.  The technology of trust: How the Internet of Things and blockchain could usher in a new era of construction productivity , 2017 .

[6]  Melanie Swan,et al.  Blockchain Temporality: Smart Contract Time Specifiability with Blocktime , 2016, RuleML.

[7]  Christof Weinhardt,et al.  Designing microgrid energy markets A case study: The Brooklyn Microgrid , 2018 .

[8]  Gaetano Zizzo,et al.  Transparency in transactive energy at distribution level , 2017, 2017 AEIT International Annual Conference.

[9]  Eliza Karolina Mik,et al.  Smart contracts: terminology, technical limitations and real world complexity , 2017 .

[10]  Markus Kraft,et al.  Blockchain technology in the chemical industry: Machine-to-machine electricity market , 2017 .

[11]  Andreas Unterweger,et al.  Privacy-preserving blockchain-based electric vehicle charging with dynamic tariff decisions , 2018, Computer Science - Research and Development.

[12]  Christopher K. Frantz,et al.  From Institutions to Code: Towards Automated Generation of Smart Contracts , 2016, 2016 IEEE 1st International Workshops on Foundations and Applications of Self* Systems (FAS*W).

[13]  Salil S. Kanhere,et al.  BlockChain: A Distributed Solution to Automotive Security and Privacy , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[14]  Michael Ball,et al.  Rebuilding Construction (Routledge Revivals): Economic Change in the British Construction Industry , 1988 .

[15]  Marcel Antal,et al.  Blockchain Based Decentralized Management of Demand Response Programs in Smart Energy Grids , 2018, Sensors.

[16]  Jong Hyuk Park,et al.  Block-VN: A Distributed Blockchain Based Vehicular Network Architecture in Smart City , 2017, J. Inf. Process. Syst..

[17]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Blockchain in government: Benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[18]  Seunghwan Kim,et al.  Energy Prosumer Business Model Using Blockchain System to Ensure Transparency and Safety , 2017 .

[19]  Zibin Zheng,et al.  An Overview of Blockchain Technology: Architecture, Consensus, and Future Trends , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress).

[20]  Karl N. Levitt,et al.  Privacy-preserving coordination for smart communities , 2016, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS).

[21]  Q. Nasir,et al.  Blockchain for government services — Use cases, security benefits and challenges , 2018, 2018 15th Learning and Technology Conference (L&T).

[22]  R. Plana,et al.  The green blockchain: Managing decentralized energy production and consumption , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2017 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC / I&CPS Europe).

[23]  A. Raan The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments , 2003 .

[24]  Giovanni Pau,et al.  ChargeltUp: On Blockchain-based technologies for Autonomous Vehicles , 2018, CRYBLOCK@MobiSys.

[25]  Syed Akhter Hossain Blockchain computing: Prospects and challenges for digital transformation , 2017, INFOCOM 2017.

[26]  Debora Coll-Mayor,et al.  Cryptocurrency as guarantees of origin: Simulating a green certificate market with the Ethereum Blockchain , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Smart Energy Grid Engineering (SEGE).

[27]  Jiangtao Wen,et al.  The IoT electric business model: Using blockchain technology for the internet of things , 2016, Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications.

[28]  David Billard,et al.  HACIT: A Privacy Preserving and Low Cost Solution for Dynamic Navigation and Forensics in VANET , 2018, VEHITS.

[29]  J. M. Avalos,et al.  How digital identity on blockchain can contribute in a smart city environment , 2017, 2017 International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2).

[30]  Qianggang Wang,et al.  A Novel Electricity Transaction Mode of Microgrids Based on Blockchain and Continuous Double Auction , 2017 .

[31]  Sarah Underwood,et al.  Blockchain beyond bitcoin , 2016, Commun. ACM.

[32]  Eric W. Burger,et al.  E-residency and blockchain , 2017, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[33]  Bilal Succar,et al.  Macro-BIM adoption: Conceptual structures , 2015 .

[34]  Christopher D. Clack,et al.  Smart Contract Templates: foundations, design landscape and research directions , 2016, ArXiv.

[35]  Nashwan Dawood,et al.  A Tool for assessing the compliance of project activities and deliverables against the requirements of BIM level 2 policy documents , 2016 .

[36]  Luca Savron,et al.  How Blockchain Technology Could Change Our Lives , 2019 .

[37]  Dong Wang,et al.  A resolution of sharing private charging piles based on smart contract , 2017, 2017 13th International Conference on Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (ICNC-FSKD).

[38]  Bilal Succar,et al.  Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders , 2009 .

[39]  Žiga Turk,et al.  Potentials of Blockchain Technology for Construction Management , 2017 .

[40]  S. Gourisetti,et al.  Blockchain for smart grid resilience: Exchanging distributed energy at speed, scale and security , 2017, 2017 Resilience Week (RWS).

[41]  Manuel Mazzara,et al.  On M2M Micropayments: A Case Study of Electric Autonomous Vehicles , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData).

[42]  David Arditi,et al.  Determinants of transaction costs in construction projects , 2015 .

[43]  CRISTINA ROTTONDI,et al.  A Privacy-Friendly Gaming Framework in Smart Electricity and Water Grids , 2017, IEEE Access.

[44]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Dispute causation: identification of pathogenic influences in construction. | NOVA. The University of Newcastle's Digital Repository , 2010 .

[45]  J. Mason,et al.  Smart contracts in construction: Views and perceptions of stakeholders , 2018 .

[46]  Sijie Chen,et al.  Smart contract-based campus demonstration of decentralized transactive energy auctions , 2017, 2017 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT).

[47]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Enabling Localized Peer-to-Peer Electricity Trading Among Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles Using Consortium Blockchains , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[48]  Mariacristina Roscia,et al.  Smart district through IoT and Blockchain , 2017, 2017 IEEE 6th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA).

[49]  Elke Zimmermann,et al.  Pair-specific usage of sleeping sites and their implications for social organization in a nocturnal Malagasy primate, the Milne Edwards' sportive lemur (Lepilemur edwardsi). , 2003, American journal of physical anthropology.

[50]  Kemal Akkaya,et al.  Block4Forensic: An Integrated Lightweight Blockchain Framework for Forensics Applications of Connected Vehicles , 2018, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[51]  Markus Kraft,et al.  Incorporating seller/buyer reputation-based system in blockchain-enabled emission trading application , 2018 .

[52]  Ian Sommerville,et al.  Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering , 2011, Interact. Comput..

[53]  Melanie Swan,et al.  Blockchain Enlightenment and Smart City Cryptopolis , 2018, CRYBLOCK@MobiSys.

[54]  Alessandra Pieroni,et al.  Smarter City: Smart Energy Grid based on Blockchain Technology , 2018 .

[55]  George M. Giaglis,et al.  From Bitcoin to Decentralized Autonomous Corporations - Extending the Application Scope of Decentralized Peer-to-Peer Networks and Blockchains , 2015, ICEIS.

[56]  Heng Hou,et al.  The Application of Blockchain Technology in E-Government in China , 2017, 2017 26th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN).

[57]  Victor C. M. Leung,et al.  A blockchain-based reputation system for data credibility assessment in vehicular networks , 2017, 2017 IEEE 28th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[58]  W. Nowiński,et al.  How Can Blockchain Technology Disrupt the Existing Business Models , 2017 .

[59]  Philip C. Treleaven,et al.  Algorithmic Government: Automating Public Services and Supporting Civil Servants in using Data Science Technologies , 2019, Comput. J..

[60]  David Sierra Mercado Crowdfunding, an alternative source of financing construction and real estate projects. Guideline for Developers on how to use this tool in medium size projects. , 2017 .

[61]  E. Trist,et al.  Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-Getting , 1951 .

[62]  Uchida Akiyoshi,et al.  Three-dimensional Wireless Power Transfer Method to Realize Efficient Charging of IoT Devices , 2017 .

[63]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Advancing socio-technical systems thinking: a call for bravery. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[64]  Brian Bowe,et al.  BIM+Blockchain: A Solution to the Trust Problem in Collaboration? , 2017 .

[65]  Henry M. Kim,et al.  Towards an Ontology-Driven Blockchain Design for Supply Chain Provenance , 2016, Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manag..

[66]  John Tookey,et al.  Building Information Modelling (BIM) uptake: Clear benefits, understanding its implementation, risks and challenges , 2017 .

[67]  Llewellyn Tang,et al.  Cup-of-Water Theory: A Review on the Interaction of BIM, IoT and Blockchain During the Whole Building Lifecycle , 2018, Proceedings of the 35th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC).

[68]  Salim Hariri,et al.  Autonomic Identity Framework for the Internet of Things , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Cloud and Autonomic Computing (ICCAC).

[69]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin Is Changing Money, Business, and the World , 2016 .

[70]  Thomas Heinz Meitinger,et al.  Smart Contracts , 2017, Informatik-Spektrum.

[71]  C. R. Kothari,et al.  Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques , 2009 .

[72]  H. Natarajan,et al.  Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) and blockchain , 2017 .

[73]  Morgen E. Peck,et al.  Blockchain world - Do you need a blockchain? This chart will tell you if the technology can solve your problem , 2017, IEEE Spectrum.

[74]  Wenchi Shou,et al.  The outlook of blockchain technology for construction engineering management , 2017 .

[75]  Wayne E. Lord,et al.  Project bank accounts: the second wave of security of payment? , 2017 .

[76]  Amy Nordrum,et al.  Govern by blockchain dubai wants one platform to rule them all, while Illinois will try anything , 2017, IEEE Spectrum.

[77]  Will Hughes,et al.  Financial Protection in the UK Building Industry: Bonds, Retentions and Guarantees , 1998 .

[78]  Vachara Peansupap,et al.  Factors Affecting the Current Diffusion of BIM: A Qualitative Study of Online Professional Network , 2013 .

[79]  Julie Maupin,et al.  The G20 countries should engage with blockchain technologies to build an inclusive, transparent, and accountable digital economy for all , 2017 .

[80]  Lawrence Chung,et al.  Using Blockchain to Enhance the Trustworthiness of Business Processes: A Goal-Oriented Approach , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC).

[81]  George M. Giaglis,et al.  With a little help from the miners: distributed ledger technology and market disintermediation , 2018, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[82]  Samad M. E. Sepasgozar,et al.  Barriers and drivers of Intelligent Contract implementation in construction , 2018 .

[83]  Vasilis Kostakis,et al.  Blockchain and Value Systems in the Sharing Economy: The Illustrative Case of Backfeed , 2017 .

[84]  Ildefons Magrans de Abril,et al.  NRGcoin: Virtual currency for trading of renewable energy in smart grids , 2014, 11th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM14).

[85]  Oliver Hinz,et al.  Blockchain , 2020, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[86]  Choong Seon Hong,et al.  Mobile charger billing system using lightweight Blockchain , 2017, 2017 19th Asia-Pacific Network Operations and Management Symposium (APNOMS).

[87]  Kem Z. K. Zhang,et al.  Blockchain-based sharing services: What blockchain technology can contribute to smart cities , 2016, Financial Innovation.

[88]  Martin White,et al.  Internet of Things, Blockchain and Shared Economy Applications , 2016, EUSPN/ICTH.

[89]  Burkhard Stiller,et al.  Blockchains everywhere - a use-case of blockchains in the pharma supply-chain , 2017, 2017 IFIP/IEEE Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management (IM).

[90]  Alan Cohn,et al.  SMART AFTER ALL: BLOCKCHAIN, SMART CONTRACTS, PARAMETRIC INSURANCE, AND SMART ENERGY GRIDS , 2017 .

[91]  O. Schülke,et al.  Strong, equitable and long-term social bonds in the dispersing sex in Assamese macaques , 2016, Animal Behaviour.

[92]  Andrea Pinna,et al.  CitySense: blockchain-oriented smart cities , 2017, XP Workshops.

[93]  Vallipuram Muthukkumarasamy,et al.  Securing Smart Cities Using Blockchain Technology , 2016, 2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE 14th International Conference on Smart City; IEEE 2nd International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS).

[94]  Christoph Merschbrock Unorchestrated symphony: The case of inter - organizational collaboration in digital construction design , 2012, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[95]  Rikiya Abe,et al.  Blockchain-based electricity trading with Digitalgrid router , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics - Taiwan (ICCE-TW).

[96]  Christof Weinhardt,et al.  A blockchain-based smart grid: towards sustainable local energy markets , 2017, Computer Science - Research and Development.

[97]  Yoshiko Okubo,et al.  Bibliometric indicators and analysis of research systems : methods and examples , 1997 .

[98]  A. McGahan,et al.  Business-Model Innovation: General Purpose Technologies and their Implications for Industry Structure , 2010 .

[99]  Budi Rahardjo,et al.  Blockchain based e-voting recording system design , 2017, 2017 11th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems Services and Applications (TSSA).

[100]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation , 2009, Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis.

[101]  O. Persson,et al.  How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis , 2009 .

[102]  Frank Teuteberg,et al.  Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry , 2016, Comput. Ind..

[103]  Gary Steri,et al.  Fostering consumers' energy market through smart contracts , 2017, 2017 International Conference in Energy and Sustainability in Small Developing Economies (ES2DE).

[104]  Salil S. Kanhere,et al.  Towards an Optimized BlockChain for IoT , 2017, 2017 IEEE/ACM Second International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Implementation (IoTDI).

[105]  D. Yermack Corporate Governance and Blockchains , 2015 .

[106]  Christof Weinhardt,et al.  Designing microgrid energy markets , 2018 .

[107]  Nir Kshetri,et al.  Will blockchain emerge as a tool to break the poverty chain in the Global South? , 2017 .

[108]  Jim Mason,et al.  Intelligent contracts and the construction industry , 2017 .

[109]  Fei-Yue Wang,et al.  Towards blockchain-based intelligent transportation systems , 2016, 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[110]  M. Atzori Blockchain Technology and Decentralized Governance: Is the State Still Necessary? , 2017 .

[111]  Jun Kogure,et al.  Blockchain Technology for Next Generation ICT , 2017 .

[112]  Anastas Mishev,et al.  Blockchain solutions for big data challenges: A literature review , 2017, IEEE EUROCON 2017 -17th International Conference on Smart Technologies.

[113]  F. Geels From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[114]  Hangbae Chang,et al.  A Sustainable Home Energy Prosumer-Chain Methodology with Energy Tags over the Blockchain , 2018 .

[115]  Marko Kovic,et al.  Blockchain for the people: Blockchain technology as the basis for a secure and reliable e-voting system , 2017 .

[116]  Praveen Gauravaram,et al.  Blockchain for IoT security and privacy: The case study of a smart home , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops).

[117]  Ruzanna Chitchyan,et al.  Enabling peer-to-peer electricity trading , 2016 .