Assessment of lower arm movements using one inertial sensor

Reduction of the number of sensors needed to evaluate arm movements, makes a system for the assessment of human body movements more suitable for clinical practice and daily life assessments. In this study, we propose an algorithm to reconstruct lower arm orientation, velocity and position, based on a sensing system which consists of only one inertial measurement unit (IMU) to the forearm. Lower arm movements were reconstructed using a single IMU and assuming that within a measurement there are moments without arm movements. The proposed algorithm, together with a single IMU attached to the forearm, may be used to evaluate lower arm movements during clinical assessments or functional tasks. In this pilot study, reconstructed quantities were compared with an optical reference system. The limits of agreement in the magnitude of the orientation vector and the norm of the velocity vectors are respectively 4.2 deg (normalized, 5.2 percent) and 7.1 cm/s (normalized, 5.8 percent). The limit of agreement of the difference between the reconstructed positions of both sensing systems were relatively greater 7.7 cm (normalized, 16.8 percent).

[1]  Peter H. Veltink,et al.  Usability Evaluation of a VibroTactile Feedback System in Stroke Subjects , 2017, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol..

[2]  J. Bussmann,et al.  Ambulatory activity monitoring: Progress in measurement of activity, posture, and specific motion patterns in daily life. , 2009 .

[3]  Daniele Giansanti,et al.  The development and test of a device for the reconstruction of 3-D position and orientation by means of a kinematic sensor assembly with rate gyroscopes and accelerometers , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  H. Rodgers,et al.  Accelerometer measurement of upper extremity movement after stroke: a systematic review of clinical studies , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[5]  A. Mcgregor,et al.  Body-Worn Sensor Design: What Do Patients and Clinicians Want? , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  P. Veltink,et al.  Objective Evaluation of the Quality of Movement in Daily Life after Stroke , 2016, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol..

[7]  Dirk Weenk,et al.  Click-on-and-play human motion capture using wearable sensors , 2015 .

[8]  Gregory J. Pottie,et al.  Personalized Multilayer Daily Life Profiling Through Context Enabled Activity Classification and Motion Reconstruction: An Integrated System Approach , 2016, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[9]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[10]  Roger Gassert,et al.  Low-power sensor module for long-term activity monitoring , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  Isaac Skog,et al.  Zero-Velocity Detection—An Algorithm Evaluation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  P. Veltink,et al.  Compensation of magnetic disturbances improves inertial and magnetic sensing of human body segment orientation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[13]  P H Veltink,et al.  Ambulatory measurement of arm orientation. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  Alessandro Tognetti,et al.  Daily-life tele-monitoring of motor performance in stroke survivors , 2014 .

[15]  T. Platz,et al.  Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.

[16]  Catherine Dehollain,et al.  Gait assessment in Parkinson's disease: toward an ambulatory system for long-term monitoring , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Isaac Skog,et al.  Evaluation of zero-velocity detectors for foot-mounted inertial navigation systems , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation.

[19]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. , 2004, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[20]  Fokke B. van Meulen,et al.  Assessment of Daily-Life Reaching Performance After Stroke , 2014, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Peter H Veltink,et al.  Ambulatory estimation of foot placement during walking using inertial sensors. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  G Plasqui,et al.  Daily physical activity assessment with accelerometers: new insights and validation studies , 2013, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.