Antimicrobial Activity and 70S Ribosome Binding of Apidaecin-Derived Api805 with Increased Bacterial Uptake Rate

In view of the global spread of multiresistant bacteria and the occurrence of panresistant bacteria, there is an urgent need for antimicrobials with novel modes of action. A promising class is antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), including them proline-rich AMPs (PrAMPs), which target the 70S ribosome to inhibit protein translation. Here, we present a new designer peptide, Api805, combining the N- and C-terminal sequences of PrAMPs Api137 and drosocin, respectively. Api805 was similarly active against two Escherichia coli B strains but was inactive against E. coli K12 strain BW25113. These different activities could not be explained by the dissociation constants measured for 70S ribosome preparations from E. coli K12 and B strains. Mutations in the SbmA transporter that PrAMPs use to pass the inner membrane or proteolytic degradation of Api805 by lysate proteases could not explain this either. Interestingly, Api805 seems not to bind to the known binding sites of PrAMPs at the 70S ribosome and inhibited in vitro protein translation, independent of release factors, most likely using a “multimodal effect”. Interestingly, Api805 entered the E. coli B strain Rosetta faster and at larger quantities than the E. coli K-12 strain BW25113, which may be related to the different LPS core structure. In conclusion, slight structural changes in PrAMPs significantly altered their binding sites and mechanisms of action, allowing for the design of different antibiotic classes.

[1]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis , 2022, The Lancet.

[2]  S. Iwata,et al.  Molecular mechanism of SbmA, a promiscuous transporter exploited by antimicrobial peptides , 2021, Science advances.

[3]  D. Klepacki,et al.  Genome-wide effects of the antimicrobial peptide apidaecin on translation termination in bacteria , 2020, bioRxiv.

[4]  F. Aarestrup,et al.  The Role of Outer Membrane Proteins and Lipopolysaccharides for the Sensitivity of Escherichia coli to Antimicrobial Peptides , 2018, Front. Microbiol..

[5]  M. Rodnina,et al.  Dynamics of ribosomes and release factors during translation termination in E. coli , 2018, bioRxiv.

[6]  B. Poolman,et al.  Ribosome surface properties may impose limits on the nature of the cytoplasmic proteome , 2017, eLife.

[7]  Daniel N. Wilson,et al.  An antimicrobial peptide that inhibits translation by trapping release factors on the ribosome , 2017, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[8]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  Correlating uptake and activity of proline-rich antimicrobial peptides in Escherichia coli , 2017, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[9]  Daniel N. Wilson,et al.  Proline-rich antimicrobial peptides targeting protein synthesis. , 2017, Natural product reports.

[10]  M. Mahlapuu,et al.  Antimicrobial Peptides: An Emerging Category of Therapeutic Agents , 2016, Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol..

[11]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  Identification of New Resistance Mechanisms in Escherichia coli against Apidaecin 1b Using Quantitative Gel- and LC-MS-Based Proteomics. , 2016, Journal of proteome research.

[12]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  Insect-derived short proline-rich and murine cathelicidin-related antimicrobial peptides act synergistically on Gram-negative bacteria in vitro. , 2016, Future medicinal chemistry.

[13]  R. Aebersold,et al.  The quantitative and condition-dependent Escherichia coli proteome , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  Short Proline‐Rich Antimicrobial Peptides Inhibit Either the Bacterial 70S Ribosome or the Assembly of its Large 50S Subunit , 2015, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[15]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  Influence of the yjiL-mdtM Gene Cluster on the Antibacterial Activity of Proline-Rich Antimicrobial Peptides Overcoming Escherichia coli Resistance Induced by the Missing SbmA Transporter System , 2015, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[16]  Daniel N. Wilson,et al.  The proline-rich antimicrobial peptide Onc112 inhibits translation by blocking and destabilizing the initiation complex , 2015, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[17]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  Insect-derived proline-rich antimicrobial peptides kill bacteria by inhibiting bacterial protein translation at the 70S ribosome. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[18]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  Novel Apidaecin 1b Analogs with Superior Serum Stabilities for Treatment of Infections by Gram-Negative Pathogens , 2012, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[19]  Ralf Hoffmann,et al.  Intracellular Toxicity of Proline-Rich Antimicrobial Peptides Shuttled into Mammalian Cells by the Cell-Penetrating Peptide Penetratin , 2012, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[20]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  Api88 is a novel antibacterial designer peptide to treat systemic infections with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. , 2012, ACS chemical biology.

[21]  Matthias Heinemann,et al.  Condition-Dependent Cell Volume and Concentration of Escherichia coli to Facilitate Data Conversion for Systems Biology Modeling , 2011, PloS one.

[22]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  Bactericidal oncocin derivatives with superior serum stabilities. , 2011, International journal of antimicrobial agents.

[23]  M. Dreyfus,et al.  Termination troubles in Escherichia coli K12 , 2011, Molecular microbiology.

[24]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  Oncocin (VDKPPYLPRPRPPRRIYNR-NH2): a novel antibacterial peptide optimized against gram-negative human pathogens. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[25]  P. Dennis,et al.  Modulation of Chemical Composition and Other Parameters of the Cell at Different Exponential Growth Rates , 2008, EcoSal Plus.

[26]  M. Benincasa,et al.  Role of the Escherichia coli SbmA in the antimicrobial activity of proline‐rich peptides , 2007, Molecular microbiology.

[27]  M. Jung,et al.  Determination of drug–serum protein interactions via fluorescence polarization measurements , 2007, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[28]  T. Kitten,et al.  An improved arbitrary primed PCR method for rapid characterization of transposon insertion sites. , 2005, Journal of microbiological methods.

[29]  P. Jansson,et al.  Structural studies on the hexose region of the core in lipopolysaccharides from Enterobacteriaceae. , 2005, European journal of biochemistry.

[30]  J. O'connor,et al.  Assessment of Escherichia coli B with enhanced permeability to fluorochromes for flow cytometric assays of bacterial cell function. , 2002, Cytometry.

[31]  Dominique Schneider,et al.  Genomic comparisons among Escherichia coli strains B, K-12, and O157:H7 using IS elements as molecular markers , 2002, BMC Microbiology.

[32]  Jr L. Otvos,et al.  The short proline-rich antibacterial peptide family , 2002, Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS.

[33]  K. Wilson Preparation of Genomic DNA from Bacteria , 2001, Current protocols in molecular biology.

[34]  L. Otvos,et al.  Antibacterial peptides isolated from insects. , 2000, Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society.

[35]  A. van Dorsselaer,et al.  A novel inducible antibacterial peptide of Drosophila carries an O-glycosylated substitution. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[36]  M. Hofnung,et al.  The SOS Chromotest, a colorimetric bacterial assay for genotoxins: validation study with 83 compounds. , 1985, Mutation research.

[37]  D. Botstein,et al.  Properties of the translocatable tetracycline-resistance element Tn10 in Escherichia coli and bacteriophage lambda. , 1978, Genetics.

[38]  Daniel N. Wilson,et al.  Intracellular Antimicrobial Peptides Targeting the Protein Synthesis Machinery. , 2019, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[39]  N. Kleckner,et al.  Uses of transposons with emphasis on Tn10. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.