Analysis of Digital Image Properties and Human Preference

The three studies summarized in this paper present evidence that aesthetic preference for visual surface texture is closely correlated with spatial frequency and orientation. The stimuli used were digital versions of real environments, in the sense that they originated in photographs of real surfaces. Correlations are significant, and robust, and they were not effected by identifiability of the images. Theoretically, this points to the possibility that aesthetic preferences for objects in the built environment—‘virtual’ and ‘real’—are not exclusively devoted to culture, memory and association, as post-modern discourse would dictate. Although more work needs to be done, it nevertheless points to the potential that preference for digital/virtual as well as real architectural environments be considered the visual stimuli to which human beings are neurologically tuned. Digital technology provides the means to implement such research, and computer simulations of ‘real’ environments will be the first application. With an ability to adapt aesthetically to the changing human condition, the important questions are how should one adapt such surfaces and under what criteria or under what influence are the adaptations made?

[1]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Experiments in segmenting texton patterns using localized spatial filters , 1989, Pattern Recognit..

[2]  P Perona,et al.  Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[3]  Tieniu Tan,et al.  Texture feature extraction via visual cortical channel modelling , 1992, Proceedings., 11th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition. Vol. III. Conference C: Image, Speech and Signal Analysis,.

[4]  Dennis Gabor,et al.  Theory of communication , 1946 .

[5]  J. Movshon,et al.  Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  Tieniu Tan,et al.  Texture analysis based on a human visual model , 1990, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[8]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  A spatial filtering approach to texture analysis , 1985, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[9]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Spatial vision. , 1971, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  Joydeep Ghosh,et al.  Textured Image Segmentation Using Localized Receptive Fields 2. Determination of Localized Spatial Frequencies , 1990 .

[11]  Michal Haindl,et al.  Unsupervised Texture Segmentation , 1998, SSPR/SPR.

[12]  S. W. Kuffler Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. , 1953, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Grant Hildebrand,et al.  Origins of architectural pleasure , 1999 .

[14]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Visual cortex neurons in monkeys and cats: Detection, discrimination, and identification , 1997, Visual Neuroscience.

[16]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Multichannel Texture Analysis Using Localized Spatial Filters , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[17]  R. Arnheim Art and Visual Perception, a Psychology of the Creative Eye , 1967 .

[18]  L. Maffei,et al.  The visual cortex as a spatial frequency analyser. , 1973, Vision research.

[19]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex , 1959, The Journal of physiology.