Title: Pectoral muscle attenuation as a marker for breast cancer risk in Full Field Digital Mammography

: Background: Mammographic percent density is an established marker of breast cancer risk. In a study of screen film mammograms we recently reported a novel feature from the pectoral muscle region to be associated with breast cancer risk independently of area percent density. We now investigate whether our novel feature is associated with risk in a study based on full field digital mammograms (FFDM). Methods: We carried out a breast cancer risk analysis using a data set of 3552 healthy controls and 278 cases. We included three image-based measures in our analyses: Volumetric percent density (VPD), area percent density (APD) and the mean intensity of the pectoral muscle (MIP). The data sets comprised different machine vendors and models. Additionally, the controls data set was used to test for the association of our measures against rs10995190 , in the ZNF365 gene, a genetic variant known to be associated with mammography density and breast cancer risk. Results: MIP was associated with breast cancer risk (per s.d OR= 0.811; 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.707 0.930]; p= 0.0028) after adjusting for conventional covariates and VPD. It was also associated with the genetic variant rs10995190 after adjusting for VPD and other covariates (per allele effect= 0.111; 95% CI [0.053 0.170]; p= 1.8×10 -4 ). Results were similar when adjusting for APD instead of VPD. Conclusion: MIP is a novel mammographic marker which is associated with breast cancer risk and the genetic variant rs10995190 independently of PD measures. Impact: Inclusion of MIP in risk models should be considered for studies using PD from FFDM.

[1]  Jingmei Li,et al.  Area and Volumetric Density Estimation in Processed Full-Field Digital Mammograms for Risk Assessment of Breast Cancer , 2014, PloS one.

[2]  T. Sellers,et al.  Automated Percentage of Breast Density Measurements for Full-field Digital Mammography Applications. , 2014, Academic radiology.

[3]  Abbas Cheddad,et al.  Enhancement of Mammographic Density Measures in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction , 2014, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[4]  M. Nielsen,et al.  Mammographic texture resemblance generalizes as an independent risk factor for breast cancer , 2014, Breast Cancer Research.

[5]  Mark F. McEntee,et al.  Mammographic density measurement: a comparison of automated volumetric density measurement to BIRADS , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[6]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Volumetric Breast Density Estimation from Full-Field Digital Mammograms: A Validation Study , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Ralph Highnam,et al.  Age and Ethnic Differences in Volumetric Breast Density in New Zealand Women: A Cross-Sectional Study , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  B. Han,et al.  Automated volumetric breast density estimation: a comparison with visual assessment. , 2013, Clinical radiology.

[9]  Jaana M. Hartikainen,et al.  Large-scale genotyping identifies 41 new loci associated with breast cancer risk , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[10]  T. Sellers,et al.  The influence of mammogram acquisition on the mammographic density and breast cancer association in the mayo mammography health study cohort , 2012, Breast Cancer Research.

[11]  M. Nielsen,et al.  A novel and automatic mammographic texture resemblance marker is an independent risk factor for breast cancer. , 2011, Cancer epidemiology.

[12]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Volume of Mammographic Density and Risk of Breast Cancer , 2011, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[13]  Peter Kraft,et al.  Common variants in ZNF365 are associated with both mammographic density and breast cancer risk , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[14]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Robust Breast Composition Measurement - VolparaTM , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[15]  Jennifer A. Harvey,et al.  Comparing a New Volumetric Breast Density Method (VolparaTM) to Cumulus , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[16]  S. Cummings,et al.  Single x-ray absorptiometry method for the quantitative mammographic measure of fibroglandular tissue volume. , 2009, Medical physics.

[17]  Norman Boyd,et al.  Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer Risk: Evaluation of a Novel Method of Measuring Breast Tissue Volumes , 2009, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[18]  Ingrid Schreer,et al.  Dense Breast Tissue as an Important Risk Factor for Breast Cancer and Implications for Early Detection , 2009, Breast Care.

[19]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography. , 2008, Medical physics.

[20]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms , 2006, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[22]  Dan Rico,et al.  A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms. , 2003, Medical physics.

[23]  Christina Gloeckner,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics With S , 2003 .

[24]  Valerie Andolina,et al.  Mammographic Imaging: A Practical Guide , 2001 .

[25]  J. Lexell,et al.  Human aging, muscle mass, and fiber type composition. , 1995, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[26]  J. Lexell,et al.  Aging of human muscle: structure, function and adaptability , 1995, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[27]  N. Boyd,et al.  The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  Karel J. Zuiderveld,et al.  Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization , 1994, Graphics Gems.

[29]  H. Tauchi,et al.  Age changes in size and number of muscle fibers in human minor pectoral muscle , 1984, Mechanisms of Ageing and Development.

[30]  M. Deschenes Effects of Aging on Muscle Fibre Type and Size , 2004, Sports medicine.

[31]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Digital Mammography , 2019, Advances in Clinical Radiology.