Population-based birth defects data in the United States, 2011-2015: A focus on eye and ear defects.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES In this data brief, we examine major eye and ear anomalies (anophthalmia/microphthalmia, anotia/microtia, and congenital cataract) for a recent 5-year birth cohort using data from 30 population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States. METHODS As a special call for data for the 2018 NBDPN Annual Report, state programs reported expanded data on eye/ear anomalies for birth years 2011-2015. We calculated the combined overall prevalence (per 10,000 live births) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), for the three anomalies as well as by maternal age, maternal race/ethnicity, infant sex, laterality, presence/absence of other major birth defects, and case ascertainment methodology utilized by the program (active vs. passive). RESULTS The overall prevalence estimate (per 10,000 live births) was 1.5 (95% CI: 1.4-1.5) for anophthalmia/microphthalmia, 1.5 (95% CI: 1.4-1.6) for congenital cataract, and 1.8 (95% CI: 1.7-1.8) for anotia/microtia. Congenital cataract prevalence varied little by maternal race/ethnicity, infant sex, or case ascertainment methodology; prevalence differences were more apparent across strata for anophthalmia/microphthalmia and anotia/microtia. Prevalence among active vs. passive ascertainment programs was 50% higher for anophthalmia/microphthalmia (1.9 vs. 1.2) and two-fold higher for anotia/microtia (2.6 vs. 1.2). Anophthalmia/microphthalmia was more likely than other conditions to co-occur with other birth defects. All conditions were more frequent among older mothers (40+ years). CONCLUSIONS This data brief provides recent prevalence estimates for anophthalmia/microphthalmia, congenital cataract, and anotia/microtia that address a data gap by examining pooled data from 30 population-based surveillance systems, covering a five-year birth cohort of about 12.4 million births.

[1]  A J Agopian,et al.  Epidemiology of anophthalmia and microphthalmia: Prevalence and patterns in Texas, 1999–2009 , 2018, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[2]  Jun Zhu,et al.  Epidemiologic characteristics and time trend in the prevalence of anotia and microtia in China. , 2016, Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology.

[3]  Russell S Kirby,et al.  Population-based birth defects data in the United States, 2008 to 2012: Presentation of state-specific data and descriptive brief on variability of prevalence. , 2015, Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology.

[4]  G. Shaw,et al.  Sociodemographic and hispanic acculturation factors and isolated anotia/microtia. , 2014, Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology.

[5]  R. Kirby,et al.  Birth defects data from population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States, 2007 to 2011: highlighting orofacial clefts. , 2014, Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology.

[6]  Rachel E. Rutkowski,et al.  The association between race/ethnicity and major birth defects in the United States, 1999-2007. , 2014, American journal of public health.

[7]  M. Cunningham,et al.  Preferential Associated Anomalies in 818 Cases of Microtia in South America , 2013, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[8]  Janet D Cragan,et al.  Selected birth defects data from population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States, 2005–2009: Featuring critical congenital heart defects targeted for pulse oximetry screening. , 2012, Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology.

[9]  K. Kamo,et al.  Clinical and genetic analysis of microtia in Japan , 2012, Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery.

[10]  R. Kirby,et al.  Updated National Birth Prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004-2006. , 2010, Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology.

[11]  S. Rasmussen,et al.  Assessment of risk factors for infantile cataracts using a case-control study: National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 2000-2004. , 2010, Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.).

[12]  Peter H Langlois,et al.  Epidemiologic features and clinical subgroups of anotia/microtia in Texas. , 2009, Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology.

[13]  A. Czeizel,et al.  Maternal Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics of Live-Born Infants With Isolated Ocular Congenital Abnormalities , 2008, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[14]  R. D. Merz,et al.  Descriptive epidemiology of anophthalmia and microphthalmia, Hawaii, 1986-2001. , 2006, Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology.

[15]  R. Kirby,et al.  Prevalence is the preferred measure of frequency of birth defects. , 2005, Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology.

[16]  H. Fledelius,et al.  Risk factors for idiopathic congenital/infantile cataract. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  R. Finnell,et al.  Epidemiologic characteristics of anophthalmia and bilateral microphthalmia among 2.5 million births in California, 1989–1997 , 2005, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[18]  S. Rasmussen,et al.  Descriptive epidemiology of infantile cataracts in metropolitan Atlanta, GA, 1968-1998. , 2003, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[19]  B. Källén,et al.  The descriptive epidemiology of anophthalmia and microphthalmia. , 1996, International journal of epidemiology.

[20]  L. Daly,et al.  Simple SAS macros for the calculation of exact binomial and Poisson confidence limits. , 1992, Computers in biology and medicine.

[21]  B. Källén,et al.  The epidemiology of anophthalmia and microphthalmia in Sweden , 2004, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[22]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Childhood blindness in the context of VISION 2020--the right to sight. , 2001, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.