Factors influencing cortical silent period: Optimized stimulus location, intensity and muscle contraction

Inhibitory silent period (SP) is a transient suppression of voluntary muscle activity after depolarization of representative motor neuronal populations following transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Our aim was to evaluate and present an optimal protocol for the measurement of SP by (1) determining the impact of muscle activation level and stimulus intensity (SI) on the duration of SP, and, (2) studying the relationship between motor evoked potential (MEP) and SP, using targeted stimulus delivery. Single magnetic pulses were focused on the optimal representation area of the thenar musculature on primary motor cortex. We utilized real-time 3D-positioning of TMS-evoked electric field on anatomical structures derived from individual MR-images. The SI varied from 80% to 120% of individual resting motor threshold (MT). Muscle activation levels varied from 20% to 80% of the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Contralateral SP lengthened significantly with increasing SI independent of target muscle activation. The peak amplitude of the MEP was affected by SI and force. Latency and duration of the MEP were practically unaffected by SI or force. Focal stimulation at 110-120% MT and approximately 50% MVC (with only negligible need for control) provides most stable and informative SP. MEP should be included in SP as the error from marking the onset diminishes. This study provides a guideline for the consistent measurement of SP, which is applicable when using navigated or traditional TMS.

[1]  R. J. Lockwood,et al.  The muscle silent period following transcranial magnetic cortical stimulation , 1993, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[2]  P. Ashby,et al.  Mechanism of the silent period following transcranial magnetic stimulation Evidence from epidural recordings , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  K. Chiappa,et al.  Cortical and spinal motor excitability during the transcranial magnetic stimulation silent period in humans , 1993, Brain Research.

[4]  P M Rossini,et al.  Interhemispheric differences of hand muscle representation in human motor cortex , 1997, Muscle & nerve.

[5]  K. R. Mills,et al.  Covariation between human intrinsic hand muscles of the silent periods and compound muscle action potentials evoked by magnetic brain stimulation: evidence for common inhibitory connections , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Antti Korvenoja,et al.  Somatotopic blocking of sensation with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary somatosensory cortex , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[7]  J. Bartko,et al.  New graphical method to measure silent periods evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  R. Benecke,et al.  On the origin of the postexcitatory inhibition seen after transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in awake human subjects , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  P. Schönle,et al.  Silent period measurement revives as a valuable diagnostic tool with transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  J Nilsson,et al.  Computer-aided determination of the silent period. , 1997, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[11]  Alfons Schnitzler,et al.  The silent period after transcranial magnetic stimulation is of exclusive cortical origin: evidence from isolated cortical ischemic lesions in man , 1994, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  C. W. Hess,et al.  Magnetic stimulation of the human brain: Facilitation of motor responses by voluntary contraction of ipsilateral and contralateral muscles with additional observations on an amputee , 1986, Neuroscience Letters.

[13]  Shozo Tobimatsu,et al.  Different patterns of excitation and inhibition of the small hand and forearm muscles from magnetic brain stimulation in humans , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  I. Tarkka,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SILENT PERIOD AFTER TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION , 1994, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[15]  K. R. Mills,et al.  Silent period to transcranial magnetic stimulation: construction and properties of stimulus–response curves in healthy volunteers , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  S. Tsuji,et al.  Inhibitory period following motor potentials evoked by magnetic cortical stimulation. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  B. Steinhoff,et al.  Effects of antiepileptic drugs on motor cortex excitability in humans: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 1996, Annals of neurology.

[18]  F. Awiszus.  TMS and threshold hunting. , 2003, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  M. Hallett,et al.  Spinal motor neuron excitability during the silent period after cortical stimulation. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  J. Rothwell,et al.  The cortical silent period: intrinsic variability and relation to the waveform of the transcranial magnetic stimulation pulse , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[21]  A Berardelli,et al.  Silent period evoked by transcranial stimulation of the human cortex and cervicomedullary junction. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  S. Pullman,et al.  Physiological basis of voluntary activity inhibition induced by transcranial cortical stimulation. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  D. D. de Quervain,et al.  Task-dependent effects on motor-evoked potentials and on the following silent period. , 1999, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[24]  G. Thickbroom,et al.  Changes in corticomotor excitation and inhibition during prolonged submaximal muscle contractions , 1997, Muscle & nerve.

[25]  M. Hallett,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques in clinical investigation , 2002, Neurology.

[26]  L. Elias,et al.  Footedness is a better predictor than is handedness of emotional lateralization , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Human handedness and asymmetry of the motor cortical silent period , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  S. C. Gandevia,et al.  Effect of contraction strength on responses in biceps brachii and adductor pollicis to transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  A. Geurts,et al.  How Salient is the Silent Period? The Role of the Silent Period in the Prognosis of Upper Extremity Motor Recovery After Severe Stroke , 2005, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[30]  R. Mutani,et al.  Magnetic brain stimulation: the silent period after the motor evoked potential. , 1992, Neurology.