Remote follow-up based on patient-reported outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease: A qualitative study of patient perspectives

Background Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly used in outpatient follow-up. PRO-based remote follow-up offers a new healthcare delivery model, where PROs are used as the basis for outpatient follow-up in patients with chronic kidney disease. However, the patient’s perspective of this novel remote care delivery remains unknown. Objectives This study aimed to explore the patients’ experiences using PROs in remote care and how this mode of follow-up may enhance patient engagement. Design A qualitative approach was employed, guided by Focused Ethnography and Interpretive Description. Participants Purposively, 15 patients with chronic kidney disease experienced with PRO-based remote follow-up in 3 renal outpatient clinics in the Central Denmark Region, were recruited. Measures Field studies comprising participant observation in remote PRO consultations and individual, semi-structured interviews with the patients constituted the empirical data. Thematic analysis was performed according to Braun and Clarke’s six-phase process. Results PRO-based remote follow-up may enhance patient engagement by a) improving communication, b) increasing disease knowledge, c) inducing flexibility, d) ensuring clinician feedback on PRO data, and e) prompting clinical action. Barriers to enhanced patient engagement were identified as a) lack of feedback on PRO data, b) lower disease knowledge, c) PRO in competition with biomedical data, and d) loss of personal relation. Conclusion PRO-based follow-up in remote care holds several advantages for the patients. However, some barriers need clinical awareness before PROs may enhance the patients’ engagement in remote follow-up. Future studies should explore the impact of involving relatives in PRO-based follow-up.

[1]  Imogen Ramsey,et al.  Patients’ experiences and perspectives of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical care: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis , 2022, PloS one.

[2]  N. Thomas,et al.  Patient perspectives and experiences of remote consultations in people receiving kidney care: A scoping review , 2022, Journal of renal care.

[3]  A. Bygholm,et al.  The association between patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient participation in chronic care: A scoping review. , 2022, Patient education and counseling.

[4]  E. Gordon,et al.  Perceptions of Telehealth vs In-Person Visits Among Older Adults With Advanced Kidney Disease, Care Partners, and Clinicians , 2021, JAMA network open.

[5]  N. Hjollund,et al.  Patient-reported outcome measures for clinical decision-making in outpatient follow-up: validity and reliability of a renal disease questionnaire , 2021, Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes.

[6]  P. Bower,et al.  Routine provision of feedback from patient-reported outcome measurements to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice. , 2021, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[7]  R. de Vries,et al.  Adherence to Telemonitoring by Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[8]  M. King,et al.  Perceived benefits and limitations of using patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice with individual patients: a systematic review of qualitative studies , 2021, Quality of Life Research.

[9]  L. Kayser,et al.  Patient perspectives on digital patient reported outcomes in routine care of inflammatory bowel disease , 2021, Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes.

[10]  A. Bokolo,et al.  Application of telemedicine and eHealth technology for clinical services in response to COVID‑19 pandemic , 2021, Health and technology.

[11]  A. Bello,et al.  Video Visits Using the Zoom for Healthcare Platform for People Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis and Nephrologists: A Feasibility Study in Alberta, Canada , 2021, Canadian journal of kidney health and disease.

[12]  D. Cadilhac,et al.  Feedback of patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals for comparing health service performance: a scoping review , 2020, BMJ Open.

[13]  T. Jafar,et al.  Perceived barriers and facilitators to chronic kidney disease care among patients in Singapore: a qualitative study , 2020, BMJ Open.

[14]  M. Carolan,et al.  Web-Based Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Personalized Treatment and Care (PROMPT-Care): Multicenter Pragmatic Nonrandomized Trial , 2020, Journal of medical Internet research.

[15]  S. Ackerman,et al.  Comparing Patients’ Experiences with Electronic and Traditional Consultation: Results from a Multisite Survey , 2020, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[16]  A. Coulter,et al.  Satisfaction with care and adherence to treatment when using patient reported outcomes to individualize follow-up care for women with early breast cancer – a pilot randomized controlled trial , 2020, Acta oncologica.

[17]  N. Hjollund,et al.  Patient-reported outcome measures in the interaction between patient and clinician – a multi-perspective qualitative study , 2020, Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes.

[18]  Joanne Greenhalgh,et al.  How do patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support clinician-patient communication and patient care? A realist synthesis , 2018, Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes.

[19]  S. Thorne,et al.  PRO-based follow-up as a means of self-management support – an interpretive description of the patient perspective , 2018, Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes.

[20]  K. Lomborg,et al.  Experiences With Telehealth Followup in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Qualitative Interview Study , 2018, Arthritis care & research.

[21]  S. N. van der Veer,et al.  Incorporating patient-reported symptom assessments into routine care for people with chronic kidney disease , 2017, Clinical kidney journal.

[22]  E. Larson,et al.  Unraveling the meaning of patient engagement: A concept analysis. , 2017, Patient education and counseling.

[23]  E. M. Castro,et al.  Patient empowerment, patient participation and patient-centeredness in hospital care: A concept analysis based on a literature review. , 2016, Patient education and counseling.

[24]  N. Hjollund,et al.  Use of patient-reported outcomes in outpatient settings as a means of patient involvement and self-management support – a qualitative study of the patient perspective , 2016 .

[25]  Per Sidenius,et al.  AmbuFlex: tele-patient-reported outcomes (telePRO) as the basis for follow-up in chronic and malignant diseases , 2016, Quality of Life Research.

[26]  Roma Maguire,et al.  What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  Erik Riiskjær,et al.  Use of Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures at Group and Patient Levels: Experiences From the Generic Integrated PRO System, WestChronic , 2014, Interactive journal of medical research.

[28]  David Feeny,et al.  Framework to assess the effects of using patient-reported outcome measures in chronic care management , 2014, Quality of Life Research.

[29]  C. Douglas,et al.  Symptom burden in chronic kidney disease: a review of recent literature. , 2013, Journal of renal care.

[30]  Sandy Oliver,et al.  Using qualitative evidence on patients’ views to help understand variation in effectiveness of complex interventions: a qualitative comparative analysis , 2013, Trials.

[31]  J. Hibbard,et al.  What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. , 2013, Health affairs.

[32]  Christiane,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2013, JAMA.

[33]  G. Velikova,et al.  How do doctors refer to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) in oncology consultations? , 2013, Quality of Life Research.

[34]  Monika Alise Johansen,et al.  Electronic Symptom Reporting Between Patient and Provider for Improved Health Care Service Quality: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Part 1: State of the Art , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[35]  Josef Coresh,et al.  Chronic kidney disease , 2012, The Lancet.

[36]  J. Hibbard,et al.  Why Does Patient Activation Matter? An Examination of the Relationships Between Patient Activation and Health-Related Outcomes , 2012, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[37]  R. Emerson,et al.  Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, Second Edition , 2011 .

[38]  A. Carr,et al.  The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[39]  A. Bottomley,et al.  Patient-reported outcomes: assessment and current perspectives of the guidelines of the Food and Drug Administration and the reflection paper of the European Medicines Agency. , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[40]  P. Sainsbury,et al.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[41]  U. S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Cen Research,et al.  Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance , 2006, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[42]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[43]  Ethan M Balk,et al.  Erratum: National Kidney Foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: Evaluation, classification, and stratification (Annals of Internal Medicine (2003) 139 (137-147)) , 2003 .

[44]  K. Malterud.  Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines , 2001, The Lancet.

[45]  S. Thorne,et al.  Interpretive description: a noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge. , 1997, Research in nursing & health.

[46]  Joane Nagel,et al.  Constructing Ethnicity: Creating and Recreating Ethnic Identity and Culture , 1994 .