Measuring Offender Progress in Treatment Using the Client Assessment Inventory

The accurate and reliable assessment of client psychological and cognitive change during correctional substance abuse treatment has gained increasing importance during the past decade as criminal justice systems seek to evaluate and understand those treatment elements associated with long-term change. The Client Assessment Inventory (CAI) is a self-report instrument for measuring client change during treatment across 14 cognitive and behavioral domains. The reliability and internal consistency of the CAI, as adapted for use in criminal justice settings, were examined with data gathered from 1,170 offenders. The research addressed the utility of the CAI for different subpopulations of offenders (e.g., race/ethnicity, gender) across a variety of correctional treatment settings. Overall, the data support the use of the CAI as a consistent, reliable, and easily administered instrument for measuring client performance and progress in treatment in both therapeutic community (TC) and non-TC correctional treatment settings.

[1]  G. Thomas,et al.  TREATMENT PROCESS IN PRISON THERAPEUTIC COMMUNITIES: MOTIVATION, PARTICIPATION, AND OUTCOME , 2001, The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse.

[2]  G. Melnick,et al.  Three-Year Reincarceration Outcomes for Amity In-Prison Therapeutic Community and Aftercare in California , 1999 .

[3]  G. de Leon Therapeutic communities for addictions: a theoretical framework. , 1995, The International journal of the addictions.

[4]  G. Leon The Therapeutic Community , 2000 .

[5]  D. Simpson,et al.  A conceptual framework for drug treatment process and outcomes. , 2004, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[6]  D. Simpson,et al.  A national 5-year follow-up of treatment outcomes for cocaine dependence. , 2002, Archives of general psychiatry.

[7]  D. Simpson,et al.  Treatment retention and follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). , 1997 .

[8]  K. Broome,et al.  Measuring patient attributes and engagement in treatment. , 2002, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[9]  S. Strauss,et al.  The Relationship Between the Quality of Drug User Treatment and Program Completion: Understanding the Perceptions of Women in a Prison-Based Program , 2000, Substance use & misuse.

[10]  D. Simpson,et al.  A longitudinal evaluation of treatment engagement and recovery stages. , 2004, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[11]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[12]  Kevin Knight,et al.  Measuring Offender Attributes and Engagement in Treatment Using the Client Evaluation of Self and Treatment , 2007 .

[13]  Jae-On Kim,et al.  Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues , 1978 .

[14]  M. Palij,et al.  Measuring client clinical progress in therapeutic community treatment. The therapeutic community Client Assessment Inventory, Client Assessment Summary, and Staff Assessment Summary. , 2000, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[15]  M. Hiller,et al.  Three-Year Reincarceration Outcomes for In-Prison Therapeutic Community Treatment in Texas , 1999 .

[16]  D. Dansereau,et al.  Cognitive Skills Training: Impact On Drug Abuse Counseling And Readiness For Treatment , 2003, The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse.

[17]  C. Butzin,et al.  Three-Year Outcomes of Therapeutic Community Treatment for Drug-Involved Offenders in Delaware: From Prison to Work Release to Aftercare , 1999 .

[18]  C. Cross Community as Method: Therapeutic Communities for Special Populations and Special Settings , 1999 .