Outer Hair Cell Receptor Current and its Effect on Cochlear Mechanics

In 1948 Gold suggested that the vibration of the organ of Corti relied on active mechanical feedback to maintain its sensitivity and frequency selectivity. Since then mathematical models of its labile vibration (Khanna and Leonard, 1982; Sellick et al, 1982, 1983, 1984; Robles et al, 1986) agree with Gold’s view that forces must be applied to the organ to partially cancel the inherent viscous forces (Neely and Kim, 1983, 1986; de Boer, 1983). This force generation process within the cochlea has been termed the active process, while the forces themselves have been termed negative damping. More recently, it has been observed that isolated outer hair cells (OHCs) from the mammal contract in vitro in response to applied electric current (Brownell et al, 1983, 1985; Ashmore, 1987). These and other observations (see Patuzzi and Robertson, 1988) suggest that the OHCs are the negative damping elements in cochlear mechanics, and that their synchronous contraction is controlled by the AC receptor current that flows through them, or by voltages that these currents produce. This combination of mechano-electric (ME) transduction at the apex of the hair cells (Holton and Hudspeth, 1987) and electromechanical (EM) cellular contraction has been termed “bi-directional transduction” (Weiss, 1982).

[1]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  Single auditory neuron response during acute acoustic trauma , 1980, Hearing Research.

[2]  S. Neely,et al.  A model for active elements in cochlear biomechanics. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  Modulation of responses of spiral ganglion cells in the guinea pig cochlea by low frequency sound , 1982, Hearing Research.

[4]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mössbauer technique. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and response phases. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  E. de Boer No sharpening? A challenge for cochlear mechanics , 1983 .

[7]  G. K. Yates,et al.  Outer hair cell receptor current and sensorineural hearing loss , 1989, Hearing Research.

[8]  M. Cheatham,et al.  Two-tone interactions in the cochlear microphonic , 1982, Hearing Research.

[9]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  The alteration of the vibration of the basilar membrane produced by loud sound , 1984, Hearing Research.

[10]  G. K. Yates,et al.  Saturation of Receptor Currents Accounts for Two-Tone Suppression , 1989 .

[11]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  The modulation of the sensitivity of the mammalian cochlea by low frequency tones. I. Primary afferent activity , 1984, Hearing Research.

[12]  D Robertson,et al.  Tuning in the mammalian cochlea. , 1988, Physiological reviews.

[13]  Thomas Gold,et al.  Hearing. II. The Physical Basis of the Action of the Cochlea , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[14]  J. Ashmore A fast motile response in guinea‐pig outer hair cells: the cellular basis of the cochlear amplifier. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  T. F. Weiss,et al.  Bidirectional transduction in vertebrate hair cells: A mechanism for coupling mechanical and electrical processes , 1982, Hearing Research.

[16]  Stephen T. Neely,et al.  An active cochlear model showing sharp tuning and high sensitivity , 1983, Hearing Research.

[17]  M. Sachs,et al.  Two-tone inhibition in auditory-nerve fibers. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  S M Khanna,et al.  Basilar membrane tuning in the cat cochlea. , 1982, Science.