The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning

Abstract A fundamental hypothesis underlying research on multimedia learning is that multimedia instructional messages that are designed in light of how the human mind works are more likely to lead to meaningful learning than those that are not. The cognitive theory of multimedia learning (CTML) is based on three cognitive science principles of learning: the human information processing system includes dual channels for visual/pictorial and auditory/verbal processing (i.e., dual-channels assumption); each channel has limited capacity for processing (i.e., limited capacity assumption); and active learning entails carrying out a coordinated set of cognitive processes during learning (i.e., active processing assumption). The cognitive theory of multimedia learning specifies five cognitive processes in multimedia learning: selecting relevant words from the presented text or narration, selecting relevant images from the presented illustrations, organizing the selected words into a coherent verbal representation, organizing selected images into a coherent pictorial representation, and integrating the pictorial and verbal representations and prior knowledge. Multimedia instructional messages should be designed to prime these processes. The Case for Multimedia Learning What is the rationale for a theory of multimedia learning? People learn more deeply from words and pictures than from words alone. This assertion – which can be called the multimedia principle – underlies much of the interest in multimedia learning. For thousands of years, words have been the major format for instruction – including spoken words, and within the last few hundred years, printed words.

[1]  Paul Ginns Meta-Analysis of the Modality Effect. , 2005 .

[2]  R. Mayer,et al.  The instructive animation: helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning , 1992 .

[3]  A. Paivio,et al.  Dual coding theory and education , 1991 .

[4]  Joan K. Gallini,et al.  When Is an Illustration Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1990 .

[5]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Cognition and Instruction: Their Historic Meeting within Educational Psychology. , 1992 .

[6]  Richard Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[7]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[8]  R. Sternberg Metaphors of mind: Conceptions of the nature of intelligence. , 1990 .

[9]  John Sweller,et al.  Instructional Design in Technical Areas , 1999 .

[10]  Dorothy M. Chun,et al.  SUPPORTING VISUAL AND VERBAL LEARNING PREFERENCES IN A SECOND LANGUAGE MULTIMEDIA LEARNING ENVIRONMENT , 1998 .

[11]  A. Miyake,et al.  Models of Working Memory , 1997 .

[12]  M. Wittrock Generative Processes of Comprehension , 1989 .

[13]  J. Bransford How people learn , 2000 .

[14]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[15]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[16]  R. Mayer,et al.  For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. , 1994 .

[17]  R. Mayer Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction , 1996 .

[18]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? , 1997 .

[19]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. , 2001 .

[20]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Teaching Readers about the Structure of Scientific Text. , 1988 .

[21]  A. Paivio Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[22]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. , 1996 .

[23]  R. Mayer,et al.  A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working Memory , 1998 .

[24]  R. Mayer Systematic Thinking Fostered by Illustrations in Scientific Text , 1989 .

[25]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[26]  R. Mayer,et al.  A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. , 2000 .

[27]  R. Mayer,et al.  Maximizing Constructivist Learning From Multimedia Communications by Minimizing Cognitive Load , 1999 .

[28]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[29]  R. Mayer,et al.  Animations need narrations : an experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis , 1991 .

[30]  Paul Ginns Integrating information: A meta-analysis of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects , 2006 .

[31]  M. Bannert,et al.  Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation , 2003 .

[32]  H A Simon,et al.  How Big Is a Chunk? , 1974, Science.

[33]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[34]  R. Mayer,et al.  A generative theory of textbook design: Using annotated illustrations to foster meaningful learning of science text , 1995 .