Scrutable Multi-agent Hazard Rescue System

Time-efficient and competent intervention in environmental hazard situations is critical. Numerous experts on the field have to be coordinated and the most appropriate one(s) should be sent to the danger zone. A traditional system would require a lot of effort on the part of the people involved, but would also involve the risk of not taking the best decisions under pressure. We propose an automated system that incorporates multiple autonomous agents, negotiation and argumentation techniques that is not only capable of making rational selections, but which can also provide justifications for the decisions it takes. Making transparent decisions is fundamental for gaining the people’s trust in this solution, but can also be used for learning purposes and for fine-tuning parameters. The system, which involves a command center and a dedicated smartphone app for the field experts, has been tested in a simulated experimental scenario around the area of Craiova, Romania.

[1]  Costin Badica,et al.  Ubiquitous Multi-agent Environmental Hazard Management , 2012, 2012 14th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing.

[2]  Paolo Torroni,et al.  Microdebates App for Android: A Tool for Participating in Argumentative Online Debates Using a Handheld Device , 2014, 2014 IEEE 26th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence.

[3]  Costin Badica,et al.  Dynamic Selection of Negotiation Protocol in Multi-agent Systems for Disaster Management , 2011, ICCCI.

[4]  Reid G. Smith,et al.  The Contract Net Protocol: High-Level Communication and Control in a Distributed Problem Solver , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[5]  Xudong Luo,et al.  Explaining Best Decisions via Argumentation , 2014, ECSI.

[6]  Agostino Poggi,et al.  Developing Multi-agent Systems with JADE , 2007, ATAL.

[7]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  Intelligent Agents for Disaster Management , 2008 .

[8]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  Assumption-Based Argumentation , 2009, Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence.

[9]  Francesca Toni,et al.  Decision Making with Assumption-Based Argumentation , 2013, TAFA.

[10]  Robert Craven,et al.  Assumption-Based Argumentation for Decision-Making with Preferences: A Medical Case Study , 2013, CLIMA.

[11]  Wamberto Weber Vasconcelos,et al.  Scrutable plan enactment via argumentation and natural language generation , 2014, AAMAS.

[12]  Paul-Amaury Matt,et al.  Dominant Decisions by Argumentation Agents , 2009, ArgMAS.

[13]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Introduction to multiagent systems , 2001 .