Realism as a retrieval cue: Evidence for concreteness‐specific effects of realistic, schematic, and verbal components of visualizations on learning and testing

[1]  Thomas Huk,et al.  Who benefits from learning with 3D models? the case of spatial ability , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[2]  H. Roediger,et al.  Semantic specificity in cued recall , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[3]  G. Yovel,et al.  Learning faces as concepts rather than percepts improves face recognition. , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  H. Smallman,et al.  Choosing and using geospatial displays: effects of design on performance and metacognition. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[5]  Fred Paas,et al.  Comparing apples and oranges? A critical look at research on learning from statics versus animations , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Learning with dynamic and static visualizations: Realistic details only benefit learners with high visuospatial abilities , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Dorothy M. Chun,et al.  SUPPORTING VISUAL AND VERBAL LEARNING PREFERENCES IN A SECOND LANGUAGE MULTIMEDIA LEARNING ENVIRONMENT , 1998 .

[8]  John Sweller,et al.  Instructional Visualizations, Cognitive Load Theory, and Visuospatial Processing , 2019, Visuospatial Processing for Education in Health and Natural Sciences.

[9]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later , 2019, Educational Psychology Review.

[10]  T. Höffler.  Spatial Ability: Its Influence on Learning with Visualizations—a Meta-Analytic Review , 2010 .

[11]  H. Ashida,et al.  Effects of detailed illustrations on science learning: an eye-tracking study , 2017 .

[12]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. , 1973 .

[13]  Fred Paas,et al.  Interactive and dynamic visualizations in teaching and learning of anatomy: a cognitive load perspective. , 2005, Anatomical record. Part B, New anatomist.

[14]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  The effects of realism in learning with dynamic visualizations , 2009 .

[15]  W. Schnotz,et al.  The role of decorative pictures in learning , 2013 .

[16]  E. Tulving,et al.  Effectiveness of retrieval cues in memory for words. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  Günter Daniel Rey,et al.  Subjective cognitive load surveys lead to divergent results for interactive learning media , 2020, Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies.

[18]  Joachim Reinwein,et al.  A second look at Dwyer's studies by means of meta-analysis: the effects of pictorial realism on text comprehension and vocabulary , 1997 .

[19]  Günter Daniel Rey,et al.  The realism paradox: Realism can act as a form of signaling despite being associated with cognitive load , 2020 .

[20]  Arzu Çöltekin,et al.  Toward optimizing the design of virtual environments for route learning: empirically assessing the effects of changing levels of realism on memory , 2019, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[21]  Jared Danielson,et al.  Computer-based versus paper-based testing: Investigating testing mode with cognitive load and scratch paper use , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  Harvey S. Smallman,et al.  The Use of 2D and 3D Displays for Shape-Understanding versus Relative-Position Tasks , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[23]  K. Salter,et al.  A monte carlo study of the f test and three tests based on ranks of treatment effects in randomized block designs , 1984 .

[24]  Francis M. Dwyer,et al.  The Relative Effectiveness of Varied Visual Illustrations in Complementing Programed Instruction , 1967 .

[25]  Eric N. Wiebe,et al.  Visual Representations of DNA Replication: Middle Grades Students’ Perceptions and Interpretations , 2005 .

[26]  Günter Daniel Rey,et al.  Realistic details in visualizations require color cues to foster retention , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[27]  Daniel M. Belenky,et al.  The Effects of Idealized and Grounded Materials on Learning, Transfer, and Interest: An Organizing Framework for Categorizing External Knowledge Representations , 2014 .

[28]  Detlev Leutner,et al.  Visualizers versus verbalizers : Effects of cognitive style on learning with texts and pictures e An eye-tracking study , 2016 .

[29]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  The Cognitive Science of Visual-Spatial Displays: Implications for Design , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[30]  Harvey S. Smallman,et al.  Naive Realism: Misplaced Faith in Realistic Displays , 2005 .

[31]  Ko-JanuchtaMarta,et al.  Visualizers versus verbalizers , 2017 .

[32]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[33]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction , 1999 .

[34]  M. Kleinknecht,et al.  Videos oder Texte in der Lehrerbildung? Effekte unterschiedlicher Medien auf die kognitive Belastung und die motivational-emotionalen Prozesse beim Lernen mit Fällen , 2015 .

[35]  Francis M. Dwyer,et al.  The Effects of Prior Knowledge, Presentation Mode, and Visual Realism on Student Achievement. , 1984 .

[36]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[37]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Naïve Cartography: How Intuitions about Display Configuration Can Hurt Performance , 2009, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[38]  Wolfgang Schnotz,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: An Integrated Model of Text and Picture Comprehension , 2005 .

[39]  Francis M. Dwyer,et al.  THE EFFECT OF VARYING THE AMOUNT OF REALISTIC DETAIL IN VISUAL ILLUSTRATIONS DESIGNED TO COMPLEMENT PROGRAMMED INSTRUCTION , 1969 .