Policies, actors and sustainability transition pathways: A study of the EU’s energy policy mix

Abstract Policies and politics are crucial elements of sustainability transitions. Transition pathways unfold as a result of continuous struggles of actors over policy goals and instruments. Taking a policy mix perspective, we study policies and policy preferences of key industry actors in the ongoing energy transition at the level of the European Union. We introduce two central analytical dimensions for transition pathways: the degree of sustainability (here: renewable energy ambition) and the degree of disruption (here: whether to pursue centralized or decentralized energy system configurations). We find that the current EU energy policy mix is heterogeneous with respect to the issue of (de-)centralization, whereas most policies and actors express high or moderate ambitions for renewable energy. Our paper makes three contributions. It demonstrates how actors and policy preferences can be explicitly included in the study of policy mixes. To the literature on transition pathways, we introduce sustainability as another key dimension in addition to disruption. Lastly, we propose a novel methodology for analyzing the politics of transition pathways.

[1]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Transition policy and innovation policy: Friends or foes? , 2011 .

[2]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The politics and economics of constructing, contesting and restricting socio-political space for renewables - the German Renewable Energy Act , 2016 .

[3]  Robert M. French Effectiveness of the Various Techniques Employed in the Study of Community Power , 1969, The Journal of Politics.

[4]  Andreas Pyka,et al.  Innovation Systems for Transformations towards Sustainability? Taking the Normative Dimension Seriously , 2017 .

[5]  Johan Lilliestam,et al.  Shades of green: Centralisation, decentralisation and controversy among European renewable electricity visions , 2016 .

[6]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[7]  Mario Richter Business model innovation for sustainable energy: German utilities and renewable energy , 2013 .

[8]  Elin Lerum Boasson,et al.  EU Climate Policy: Industry, Policy Interaction and External Environment , 2017 .

[9]  P. Río On evaluating success in complex policy mixes: the case of renewable energy support schemes , 2014 .

[10]  M. Pollitt,et al.  Electricity Market Reform in the European Union: Review of Progress toward Liberalization &Integration* , 2005 .

[11]  S. Franceschini,et al.  Non-disruptive regime changes-The case of competing energy efficient lighting trajectories , 2016 .

[12]  Jonas Meckling,et al.  The Globalization of Carbon Trading: Transnational Business Coalitions in Climate Politics , 2011, Global Environmental Politics.

[13]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The politics of social-ecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions , 2010 .

[14]  M. Howlett,et al.  Patching vs Packaging in Policy Formulation: Assessing Policy Portfolio Design , 2013 .

[15]  Gregor Kungl,et al.  Stewards or sticklers for change? Incumbent energy providers and the politics of the German energy transition , 2015 .

[16]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis , 2016 .

[17]  Timothy J. Foxon,et al.  Transition pathways for a UK low carbon electricity future , 2013 .

[18]  B. Fagan-Watson,et al.  Lobbying by Trade Associations on EU Climate Policy , 2015 .

[19]  Dierk Bauknecht,et al.  Typology of centralised and decentralised visions for electricity infrastructure , 2016 .

[20]  E. Schmid,et al.  Putting an energy system transformation into practice: The case of the German Energiewende , 2016 .

[21]  Thomas Magnusson,et al.  From CoPS to mass production? Capabilities and innovation in power generation equipment manufacturing , 2005 .

[22]  Kristina Dahlin,et al.  When is an Invention Really Radical? Defining and Measuring Technological Radicalness , 2005 .

[23]  D. Rosenbloom,et al.  Pathways: An emerging concept for the theory and governance of low-carbon transitions , 2017 .

[24]  Thomas Magnusson,et al.  Transition pathways revisited: Established firms as multi-level actors in the heavy vehicle industry , 2015 .

[25]  O. Edenhofer Climate change 2014 : mitigation of climate change : Working Group III contribution to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2015 .

[26]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Dynamic Sustainabilities: Technology, Environment, Social Justice , 2010 .

[27]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930) , 2005, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[28]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The politics of innovation spaces for low-carbon energy: introduction to the special issue , 2016 .

[29]  Grischa Perino,et al.  Do renewable energy policies reduce carbon emissions? On caps and inter-industry leakage , 2017 .

[30]  L. Goulder Markets for Pollution Allowances: What Are the (New) Lessons? , 2013 .

[31]  Ulrich Dolata,et al.  Transformative Capacity, Adaptability, Patterns of Change: An Analytical Framework , 2009 .

[32]  Paula Kivimaa,et al.  Creative Destruction or Mere Niche Creation? Innovation Policy Mixes for Sustainability Transitions , 2015 .

[33]  Oscar Fitch-Roy Negotiating the EU’s 2030 Climate and Energy Framework: Agendas, Ideas and European Interest Groups , 2018 .

[34]  Bettina Wittneben The impact of the Fukushima nuclear accident on European energy policy , 2012 .

[35]  T. Schmidt,et al.  Technology as a driver of climate and energy politics , 2017, Nature Energy.

[36]  Frank Nevens,et al.  A Comparison of Energy Transition Governance in Germany, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom , 2014 .

[37]  Brendan Haley,et al.  Designing the public sector to promote sustainability transitions: Institutional principles and a case study of ARPA-E , 2017 .

[38]  Allan Dahl Andersen No transition without transmission: HVDC electricity infrastructure as an enabler for renewable energy? , 2014 .

[39]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: Contributions and suggestions for research , 2011 .

[40]  A. Stirling Transforming power: Social science and the politics of energy choices , 2014 .

[41]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Keeping sustainable innovation on a leash? Exploring incumbents’ institutional strategies , 2015 .

[42]  Saad Mekhilef,et al.  Grid-connected isolated PV microinverters: A review , 2017 .

[43]  C. Mitchell Momentum is increasing towards a flexible electricity system based on renewables , 2016, Nature Energy.

[44]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  Analyzing interdependencies between policy mixes and technological innovation systems: the case of offshore wind in Germany , 2016 .

[45]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions , 2005 .

[46]  A. Gullberg Pressure or Information? Lobbying for Binding Renewable Energy Targets in the European Union , 2013 .

[47]  J. Rayner,et al.  Design Principles for Policy Mixes: Cohesion and Coherence in ‘New Governance Arrangements’ , 2007 .

[48]  Tuukka Mäkitie,et al.  Established sectors expediting clean technology industries? The Norwegian oil and gas sector's influence on offshore wind power , 2018 .

[49]  Atul K. Raturi,et al.  Renewables 2016 Global status report , 2015 .

[50]  William D'haeseleer,et al.  Impact of renewables deployment on the CO2 price and the CO2 emissions in the European electricity sector , 2013 .

[51]  D. Hess The politics of niche-regime conflicts: Distributed solar energy in the United States , 2016 .

[52]  Lars Coenen,et al.  The Geography of Sustainability Transitions: Review, Synthesis and Reflections on an Emergent Research Field. , 2015 .

[53]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Innovation processes in large technical systems: Market liberalization as a driver for radical change? , 2006 .

[54]  J. Meadowcroft Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions , 2011 .

[55]  Jochen Markard,et al.  The offshore trend: Structural changes in the wind power sector , 2009 .

[56]  D. Hess Sustainability transitions: A political coalition perspective , 2014 .

[57]  K. Ingold,et al.  Socio-Technical Transitions and Policy Change - Advocacy Coalitions in Swiss Energy Policy , 2016 .

[58]  Kornelia Konrad,et al.  Strategic responses to fuel cell hype and disappointment , 2012 .

[59]  Hermann Scheer,et al.  Energy Autonomy: The Economic, Social and Technological Case for Renewable Energy , 2006 .

[60]  F. Geels From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[61]  Derk Loorbach,et al.  Transition Management: A Reflexive Governance Approach , 2006 .

[62]  B. Girod Product-oriented climate policy: learning from the past to shape the future , 2016 .

[63]  Thomas Magnusson,et al.  Technological discontinuities and the challenge for incumbent firms: Destruction, disruption or creative accumulation? , 2013 .

[64]  F. Geels,et al.  The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014) , 2016 .

[65]  E. Uyarra,et al.  Reconceptualising the 'policy mix' for innovation , 2011 .

[66]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  How the policy mix impacts innovation: Findings from company case studies on offshore wind in Germany , 2016 .

[67]  Jean-Michel Glachant,et al.  The EU internal electricity market: Done forever? , 2014 .

[68]  Jochen Markard,et al.  The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy , 2018, Nature Energy.

[69]  V. Lauber,et al.  Assessing the performance of renewable electricity support instruments , 2012 .

[70]  Elke Herrfahrdt-Pähle,et al.  Continuity and Change in Social-ecological Systems: the Role of Institutional Resilience , 2012 .

[71]  Paula Kivimaa,et al.  Policy Mixes, Policy Interplay and Low Carbon Transitions: The Case of Passenger Transport in Finland , 2014 .

[72]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Technological Forecasting & Social Change , 2011 .

[73]  F. Geels,et al.  Exploring sustainability transitions in the electricity sector with socio-technical pathways , 2010 .

[74]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Earth System Science for Global Sustainability: Grand Challenges , 2010, Science.

[75]  Marc Dijk,et al.  Will the momentum of the electric car last? Testing an hypothesis on disruptive innovation , 2016 .

[76]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[77]  Ottmar Edenhofer,et al.  Causes of the EU ETS price drop: Recession, CDM, renewable policies or a bit of everything? - New evidence , 2014 .

[78]  Christoph Böhringer,et al.  Green promotes the dirtiest: on the interaction between black and green quotas in energy markets , 2010 .

[79]  Jisung Park,et al.  Combining Multiple Climate Policy Instruments: How Not to Do It , 2010 .

[80]  D. Sperling,et al.  Car manufacturers’ changing political strategies on the ZEV mandate , 2014 .

[81]  C. Weible,et al.  The Advocacy Coalition Framework , 2012, Theories of the Policy Process.

[82]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Innovating incumbents and technological complementarities: How recent dynamics in the HVDC industry can inform transition theories , 2017 .

[83]  Florian Kern,et al.  The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: Towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions , 2019, Research Policy.