On the geometry of symmetry breaking inequalities

Breaking symmetries is a popular way of speeding up the branch-and-bound method for symmetric integer programs. We study symmetry breaking polyhedra, more precisely, fundamental domains. Our long-term goal is to understand the relationship between the complexity of such polyhedra and their symmetry breaking ability. Borrowing ideas from geometric group theory, we provide structural properties that relate the action of the group to the geometry of the facets of fundamental domains. Inspired by these insights, we provide a new generalized construction for fundamental domains, which we call generalized Dirichlet domain (GDD). Our construction is recursive and exploits the coset decomposition of the subgroups that fix given vectors in $\mathbb{R}^n$. We use this construction to analyze a recently introduced set of symmetry breaking inequalities by Salvagnin (2018) and Liberti and Ostrowski (2014), called Schreier-Sims inequalities. In particular, this shows that every permutation group admits a fundamental domain with less than $n$ facets. We also show that this bound is tight. Finally, we prove that the Schreier-Sims inequalities can contain an exponential number of isomorphic binary vectors for a given permutation group $G$, which shows evidence of the lack of symmetry breaking effectiveness of this fundamental domain. Conversely, a suitably constructed GDD for $G$ has linearly many inequalities and contains unique representatives for isomorphic binary vectors.

[1]  François Margot,et al.  Symmetry in Integer Linear Programming , 2010, 50 Years of Integer Programming.

[2]  George W. Polites,et al.  An introduction to the theory of groups , 1968 .

[3]  Toby Walsh,et al.  Handbook of Constraint Programming , 2006, Handbook of Constraint Programming.

[4]  Volker Kaibel,et al.  Extended Formulations for Packing and Partitioning Orbitopes , 2008, Math. Oper. Res..

[5]  G. L. Dirichlet Über die Reduction der positiven quadratischen Formen mit drei unbestimmten ganzen Zahlen. , 1850 .

[6]  Leo Liberti,et al.  Reformulations in mathematical programming: automatic symmetry detection and exploitation , 2010, Mathematical Programming.

[7]  László Babai,et al.  Canonical labeling of graphs , 1983, STOC.

[8]  Jeff T. Linderoth,et al.  Orbital branching , 2007, Math. Program..

[9]  Tobias Achterberg,et al.  Mixed Integer Programming: Analyzing 12 Years of Progress , 2013 .

[10]  László Babai,et al.  Graph isomorphism in quasipolynomial time [extended abstract] , 2015, STOC.

[11]  Á. Seress Permutation Group Algorithms , 2003 .

[12]  Marc E. Pfetsch,et al.  Polytopes associated with symmetry handling , 2019, Math. Program..

[13]  Leo Liberti,et al.  Exploiting symmetries in mathematical programming via orbital independence , 2019 .

[14]  Domenico Salvagnin,et al.  Symmetry Breaking Inequalities from the Schreier-Sims Table , 2018, CPAIOR.

[15]  V. Kaibel,et al.  Packing and partitioning orbitopes , 2006, math/0603678.

[16]  James M. Crawford,et al.  Symmetry-Breaking Predicates for Search Problems , 1996, KR.

[17]  François Margot,et al.  Pruning by isomorphism in branch-and-cut , 2001, Math. Program..

[18]  L. J. Boya,et al.  On Regular Polytopes , 2012, 1210.0601.

[19]  H. Sherali,et al.  Defeating symmetry in combinatorial optimization via objective perturbations and hierarchical constraints , 2011 .

[20]  Eric J. Friedman,et al.  Fundamental Domains for Integer Programs with Symmetries , 2007, COCOA.

[21]  Hanif D. Sherali,et al.  Improving Discrete Model Representations via Symmetry Considerations , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Jean-François Puget Breaking symmetries in all different problems , 2005, IJCAI.

[23]  Ilya Shlyakhter,et al.  Generating effective symmetry-breaking predicates for search problems , 2001, Discrete Applied Mathematics.

[24]  Toby Walsh,et al.  Handbook of Constraint Programming (Foundations of Artificial Intelligence) , 2006 .

[25]  Leo Liberti,et al.  Stabilizer-based symmetry breaking constraints for mathematical programs , 2013, Journal of Global Optimization.