A Detailed Power System Planning Model: Estimating the Long-Run Impact of Carbon-Reducing Policies

In this paper, a much more detailed representation of the nation's electricity system than has been traditionally used in policy models is employed. This detailed representation greatly increases the computational difficulty of obtaining optimal solutions, but is necessary to accurately model the location of new investment in generation. Given the proposed regulation of CO2 emissions from US power plants, an examination of economically efficient policies for reducing these emissions is warranted. The model incorporates realistic physical constraints, investment and retirement of generation, and price-responsive load to simulate the effects of policies for limiting CO2 emissions over a twenty-year forecast horizon. Using network reductions for each of the three electric system regions in the U.S. And Canada, an optimal economic dispatch, that satisfies reliability criteria, is assigned for 12 typical hour-types in each year. Three scenarios are modeled that consider subsidies for renewables and either CO2 emissions regulation on new investment or cap-and-trade. High and low gas price trends are also simulated and have large effects on prices of electricity but small impacts on CO2 emissions. Low gas prices with cap-and-trade reduce CO2 emissions the most, large subsidies for renewables alone do not reduce carbon emissions much below existing levels. Extensive retirement of coal-fired power plants occurs in all cases.

[1]  Shanjun Li,et al.  Division of Economics and Business Working Paper Series A New Look at Residential Electricity Demand Using Household Expenditure Data , 2012 .

[2]  EnergyInformationAdministration Annual Energy Outlook 2008 With Projections to 2030 , 2008 .

[3]  R. Zimmerman,et al.  Does a detailed model of the electricity grid matter? Estimating the impacts of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative , 2014 .

[4]  Ross Baldick,et al.  Unit commitment with probabilistic reserve , 2002, 2002 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37309).

[5]  John Taber,et al.  Mapping Energy Futures Using the SuperOPF Planning Tool: An Integrated Engineering, Economic and Environmental Model , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[6]  Harrison Fell,et al.  A New Approach to Estimate Residential Electricity Demand Using Household Expenditure Data , 2011 .

[7]  Robert J. Thomas,et al.  A stochastic, contingency-based security-constrained optimal power flow for the procurement of energy and distributed reserve , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[8]  R D Zimmerman,et al.  MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  Nate Blair,et al.  Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS) , 2011 .

[10]  Pooya Soltantabar Annual Energy Outlook , 2015 .

[11]  Carol A. Dahl,et al.  A survey of energy demand elasticities in support of the development of the NEMS , 1993 .

[12]  Dallas Burtraw,et al.  HAIKU DOCUMENTATION: RFF'S ELECTRICITY MARKET MODEL VERSION 2.0 , 2009 .