Water Use Efficiencies of Different Maturity Group Soybean Cultivars in the Humid Mississippi Delta

Introducing alternative cultivars with enhanced water use efficiencies can help alleviate pressure on groundwater for crop irrigations in Mississippi (MS) Delta. A two-year field study was conducted in 2019–2020 to compare the water use efficiencies (WUE) of recently released and pre-released soybean {Glycine max (L.) Merr.} cultivars in maturity group (MG) III (‘P37A78’, ‘LG03-4561-14’), IV (‘Dyna-gro 4516x’, ‘DS25-1, DT97-4290’), and V (‘S12-1362’, ‘S14-16306’) in the MS Delta. The experimental design was a split-plot with cultivar as the first factor and the second factor was water variant irrigation (IR) and no irrigation (RF, rainfed), replicated three times. The MG IV cultivar Dyna-gro 4516x recorded the highest grain yield and WUE: grain yields were 4.58 Mg ha−1 and 3.89 Mg ha−1 under IR and RF, respectively in 2019, and 4.74 Mg ha−1 and 4.35 Mg ha−1 in 2020. The WUE were 7.2 and 6.9 kg ha−1 mm−1, respectively, in 2019 under IR and RF, and 13.4 and 16.9 kg ha−1 mm−1 in 2020. The data reveals that ‘Dyna-gro 4516x’ (MG IV), ‘LG03-4561-14’ (MG III), and ‘P37A78’ (MG III) are best adapted to the early soybean production system (ESPS) in MS Delta region for sustainable production for conserving water resources.

[1]  L. Heatherly,et al.  Managing Inputs for Peak Production , 2016 .

[2]  R. Sui,et al.  Effects of irrigation and planting geometry on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) fiber quality and seed composition , 2021, Journal of Cotton Research.

[3]  Xiaoling Wu,et al.  Analysis of Grain Yield Differences Among Soybean Cultivars under Maize–Soybean Intercropping , 2020 .

[4]  J. Hatfield,et al.  Water-Use Efficiency: Advances and Challenges in a Changing Climate , 2019, Front. Plant Sci..

[5]  A. Gillen,et al.  Effect of Maturity on Seed Composition in the Early Soybean Production System as Measured on Near-Isogenic Soybean Lines , 2009 .

[6]  H. Nguyen,et al.  Evaluation and development of flood-tolerant soybean cultivars , 2017 .

[7]  J. H. Williams,et al.  Differential Responses of Soybean Genotypes Subjected to a Seasonal Soil Water Gradient 1 , 1986 .

[8]  S. Irmak,et al.  U.S. Agro-Climate in 20th Century: Growing Degree Days, First and Last Frost, Growing Season Length, and Impacts on Crop Yields , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[9]  M. Rakocevic,et al.  Grain Yield Differences of Soybean Cultivars Due to Solar Radiation Interception , 2017 .

[10]  Deborah P. Delmer,et al.  The U.S. drought of 2012 in perspective: A call to action , 2013 .

[11]  Ruixiu Sui,et al.  Irrigation Methods and Scheduling in the Delta Region of Mississippi: Current Status and Strategies to Improve Irrigation Efficiency , 2014 .

[12]  R. Roberts,et al.  Mid-South Soybean Yield and Net Return as Affected by Plant Population and Row Spacing , 2015 .

[13]  Matthew B. Sullivan,et al.  Evaluating On‐Farm Flooding Impacts on Soybean , 2001 .

[14]  N. Turner,et al.  Irrigation during Flowering Improves Subsoil Water Uptake and Grain Yield in Rainfed Soybean , 2020, Agronomy.

[15]  J. Specht,et al.  Soybean yield potential: A genetic and physiological perspective , 1999 .

[16]  L. Krutz,et al.  Narrow-Row Production System for Soybeans in Mississippi Delta , 2019, Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management.

[17]  L. Krutz,et al.  Determining the Optimum Irrigation Schedule in Furrow Irrigated Cotton using Soil Moisture Sensors , 2019, Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management.

[18]  Dominique Desclaux,et al.  Impact of drought stress on the phenology of two soybean ( Glycine max L. Merr) cultivars , 1996 .

[19]  R. Sui,et al.  Quantifying water and CO2 fluxes and water use efficiencies across irrigated C3 and C4 crops in a humid climate. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  Robert L. Paris,et al.  Identification of Soybean Accessions with High Germinability in High‐Temperature Environments , 2008 .

[21]  C. Zucareli,et al.  Yield performance of soybean cultivars with indeterminate growth habits in response to plant spatial arrangement , 2019, Semina: Ciências Agrárias.

[22]  W. Pettigrew MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY Twin-Row Production of Cotton Genotypes Varying in Leaf Shape , 2015 .

[23]  S. Anapalli,et al.  Irrigation and Planting Geometry Effects on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Yield and Water Use , 2020, Journal of Cotton Science.

[24]  K. Aydinsakir Yield and Quality Characteristics of Drip‐Irrigated Soybean under Different Irrigation Levels , 2018, Agronomy Journal.

[25]  K. N. Reddy,et al.  Assessing irrigation water use efficiency and economy of twin‐row soybean in the Mississippi Delta , 2020 .

[26]  L. Castlebury,et al.  Seasonal Progress of Phomopsis longicolla Infection on Soybean Plant Parts and Its Relationship to Seed Quality. , 2009, Plant disease.

[27]  P. Bauer,et al.  Drought‐Stress Effects on Branch and Mainstem Seed Yield and Yield Components of Determinate Soybean , 2001 .

[28]  T. Fukao,et al.  Physiological and transcriptomic characterization of submergence and reoxygenation responses in soybean seedlings. , 2014, Plant, cell & environment.

[29]  H. Nguyen,et al.  Expression of Root-Related Transcription Factors Associated with Flooding Tolerance of Soybean (Glycine max) , 2014, International journal of molecular sciences.

[30]  A. Blum Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential-are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? , 2005 .

[31]  R. Nelson,et al.  Registration of High‐Yielding Exotically Derived Soybean Germplasm Line LG03‐4561‐14 , 2019, Journal of Plant Registrations.