A framework for inverse planning of beam-on times for 3D small animal radiotherapy using interactive multi-objective optimisation

Advances in precision small animal radiotherapy hardware enable the delivery of increasingly complicated dose distributions on the millimeter scale. Manual creation and evaluation of treatment plans becomes difficult or even infeasible with an increasing number of degrees of freedom for dose delivery and available image data. The goal of this work is to develop an optimisation model that determines beam-on times for a given beam configuration, and to assess the feasibility and benefits of an automated treatment planning system for small animal radiotherapy. The developed model determines a Pareto optimal solution using operator-defined weights for a multiple-objective treatment planning problem. An interactive approach allows the planner to navigate towards, and to select the Pareto optimal treatment plan that yields the most preferred trade-off of the conflicting objectives. This model was evaluated using four small animal cases based on cone-beam computed tomography images. Resulting treatment plan quality was compared to the quality of manually optimised treatment plans using dose-volume histograms and metrics. Results show that the developed framework is well capable of optimising beam-on times for 3D dose distributions and offers several advantages over manual treatment plan optimisation. For all cases but the simple flank tumour case, a similar amount of time was needed for manual and automated beam-on time optimisation. In this time frame, manual optimisation generates a single treatment plan, while the inverse planning system yields a set of Pareto optimal solutions which provides quantitative insight on the sensitivity of conflicting objectives. Treatment planning automation decreases the dependence on operator experience and allows for the use of class solutions for similar treatment scenarios. This can shorten the time required for treatment planning and therefore increase animal throughput. In addition, this can improve treatment standardisation and comparability of research data within studies and among different institutes.

[1]  Wolfgang Enghardt,et al.  Pre-clinical research in small animals using radiotherapy technology--a bidirectional translational approach. , 2014, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[2]  Jeroen Belien,et al.  Dose optimization in high-dose-rate brachytherapy: A literature review of quantitative models from 1990 to 2010 , 2014 .

[3]  Alper Atamtürk,et al.  IPIP: A new approach to inverse planning for HDR brachytherapy by directly optimizing dosimetric indices. , 2010, Medical physics.

[4]  Anders Brahme,et al.  Treatment Optimization Using Physical and Radiobiological Objective Functions , 1995 .

[5]  Fernando Alonso,et al.  Multicriteria Optimization in Intensity Modulated Rediotherapy Planning , 2009 .

[6]  Timothy C Y Chan,et al.  Predicting objective function weights from patient anatomy in prostate IMRT treatment planning. , 2013, Medical physics.

[7]  D. den Hertog,et al.  Mixed integer programming improves comprehensibility and plan quality in inverse optimization of prostate HDR brachytherapy , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Iwan Kawrakow,et al.  DOSXYZnrc Users Manual , 2016 .

[9]  Karl Otto,et al.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. , 2007, Medical physics.

[10]  David L Craft,et al.  Approximating convex pareto surfaces in multiobjective radiotherapy planning. , 2006, Medical physics.

[11]  Frank Verhaegen,et al.  Development and validation of a treatment planning system for small animal radiotherapy: SmART-Plan. , 2013, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  E. Graves,et al.  Modality comparison for small animal radiotherapy: a simulation study. , 2013, Medical physics.

[13]  Michael C. Ferris,et al.  Optimizing the Delivery of Radiation Therapy to Cancer Patients , 1999, SIAM Rev..

[14]  R. Cloutier.  Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement. , 1989 .

[15]  A. Tarakanova,et al.  Molecular modeling of protein materials: case study of elastin , 2013 .

[16]  Frank Verhaegen,et al.  A review of treatment planning for precision image-guided photon beam pre-clinical animal radiation studies. , 2014, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[17]  Nick Jagiella,et al.  Estimating Dose Painting Effects in Radiotherapy: A Mathematical Model , 2014, PloS one.

[18]  F Verhaegen,et al.  Small animal image-guided radiotherapy: status, considerations and potential for translational impact. , 2015, The British journal of radiology.

[19]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Nonlinear multiobjective optimization , 1998, International series in operations research and management science.

[20]  D A Jaffray,et al.  Characterization of image quality and image-guidance performance of a preclinical microirradiator. , 2011, Medical physics.

[21]  Rasmus Bokrantz,et al.  Multicriteria optimization for managing tradeoffs in radiation therapy treatment planning , 2013 .

[22]  David A Jaffray,et al.  Two-dimensional inverse planning and delivery with a preclinical image guided microirradiator. , 2013, Medical physics.

[23]  M. McLure.  One Hundred Years from Today: Vilfredo Pareto, Manuale di Economia Politica con una Introduzione alla Scienza Sociale, Milan: Societa Editrice Libraria. 1906 , 2006 .

[24]  Erik Tryggestad,et al.  Small animal radiotherapy research platforms , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Frank Verhaegen,et al.  A longitudinal evaluation of partial lung irradiation in mice by using a dedicated image-guided small animal irradiator. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  F. Verhaegen,et al.  A combined dose calculation and verification method for a small animal precision irradiator based on onboard imaging. , 2012, Medical physics.

[27]  T. Larsson,et al.  Impact of using linear optimization models in dose planning for HDR brachytherapy. , 2012, Medical physics.