Modelling of tokamak glow discharge cleaning II: comparison with experiment and application to ITER

The primary function of the ITER glow discharge cleaning (GDC) system will be the preparation of in-vessel component surfaces prior to the machine start-up. It may also contribute to tritium removal in the nuclear phase. In GDC, conditioning efficiency is strongly dependent on the homogeneity of the flux of ions impinging onto wall surfaces. In order to assess the wall particle flux distribution in ITER, a novel 2D multi-fluid model, described in a companion paper, has recently been developed and is benchmarked here against both experimental glow discharge data obtained in a small laboratory chamber with cylindrical geometry and from two large toroidal devices: the JET tokamak and the RFX reverse field pinch. In the laboratory plasma, simulated and measured plasma electron density and temperature are in a good agreement in the negative glow region, while discrepancies exist in the anode glow, where the fluid description of the model is inaccurate due to long mean free paths of electrons. Calculated and measured ion flux distribution profiles in RFX are found in good agreement, whereas in JET comparison it is more difficult, due to the complex geometry of the first wall which leads to local inhomogeneities in the measured flux. Simulations of H2-GDC for ITER with one or two anodes indicate fairly homogeneous plasma parameters and wall ion flux in the negative glow at 0.5 Pa, a commonly used gas pressure for GDC in existing fusion devices. Although the axisymmetric geometry in the model does not allow all seven ITER anodes to be powered simultaneously in the simulations, the results can be extrapolated to the full system and predict ion current densities on wall surfaces close to the simple expectation of total anode current divided by wall surface area (0.21 A m−2), which is relevant to GDC in JET and other machines.

[1]  C. Mahony,et al.  Characterization of a high-density, direct-current reflex discharge plasma source operating in Ar and N2 , 2002 .

[2]  G. Franz Low Pressure Plasmas and Microstructuring Technology , 2009 .

[4]  J. Contributors,et al.  Wall conditioning of JET with the ITER-Like Wall , 2013 .

[5]  K. Emeléus Anode glows in glow discharges: outstanding problems , 1982 .

[6]  G. Saibene,et al.  Review of vacuum vessel conditioning procedures at JET and their impact on plasma operation , 1995 .

[7]  Edward A. Mason,et al.  Transport Properties of Gaseous Ions over a Wide Energy Range , 1976 .

[8]  A. Kukushkin,et al.  Physics basis and design of the ITER plasma-facing components , 2011 .

[9]  L. Pitchford,et al.  Solving the Boltzmann equation to obtain electron transport coefficients and rate coefficients for fluid models , 2005 .

[10]  Joachim Roth,et al.  Recent analysis of key plasma wall interactions issues for ITER , 2009 .

[11]  Active electron energy distribution function control in direct current discharge using an auxiliary electrode , 2013 .

[12]  R. Pitts,et al.  Modelling of tokamak glow discharge cleaning I: physical principles , 2015 .

[13]  R. Cavazzana,et al.  Studies of spatial uniformity of glow discharge cleaning plasmas on the RFX-mod device , 2013 .

[14]  M. Shimada,et al.  Wall conditioning on ITER , 2011 .

[15]  F L Tabarés,et al.  Tritium inventory control during ITER operation under carbon plasma-facing components by nitrogen-based plasma chemistry: a review , 2013 .