The effective size of a subdivided population.

This paper derives the long-term effective size, Ne, for a general model of population subdivision, allowing for differential deme fitness, variable emigration and immigration rates, extinction, colonization, and correlations across generations in these processes. We show that various long-term measures of Ne are equivalent. The effective size of a metapopulation can be expressed in a variety of ways. At a demographic equilibrium, Ne can be derived from the demography by combining information about the ultimate contribution of each deme to the future genetic make-up of the population and Wright's FST's. The effective size is given by Ne = 1/(1 + var (upsilon) ((1 - FST)/Nin), where n is the number of demes, theta i is the eventual contribution of individuals in deme i to the whole population (scaled such that sigma theta i = n), and < > denotes an average weighted by theta i. This formula is applied to a catastrophic extinction model (where sites are either empty or at carrying capacity) and to a metapopulation model with explicit dynamics, where extinction is caused by demographic stochasticity and by chaos. Contrary to the expectation from the standard island model, the usual effect of population subdivision is to decrease the effective size relative to a panmictic population living on the same resource.

[1]  S. Wright Evolution in mendelian populations , 1931 .

[2]  J. Haldane,et al.  THE EQUILIBRIUM BETWEEN MUTATION AND RANDOM EXTINCTION , 1939 .

[3]  T. Maruyama Rate of decrease of genetic variability in a two-dimensional continuous population of finite size. , 1972, Genetics.

[4]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Effective size of populations with overlapping generations. , 1972, Theoretical population biology.

[5]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. , 1974, Genetical research.

[6]  M. Slatkin Gene flow and genetic drift in a species subject to frequent local extinctions. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[7]  W. G. Hill,et al.  A note on effective population size with overlapping generations. , 1979, Genetics.

[8]  M. Kimura,et al.  Genetic variability and effective population size when local extinction and recolonization of subpopulations are frequent. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  T. Nagylaki,et al.  The strong-migration limit in geographically structured populations , 1980, Journal of mathematical biology.

[10]  Warren J. Ewens,et al.  On the concept of the effective population size , 1982 .

[11]  R. Lande,et al.  Viable Populations for Conservation: Effective population size, genetic variation, and their use in population management , 1987 .

[12]  R. Lande Genetics and demography in biological conservation. , 1988, Science.

[13]  I. Hanski,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics: Does it help to have more of the same? , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  M. Whitlock,et al.  SOME POPULATION GENETIC CONSEQUENCES OF COLONY FORMATION AND EXTINCTION: GENETIC CORRELATIONS WITHIN FOUNDING GROUPS , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  R. Hudson Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. , 1990 .

[16]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics : empirical and theoretical investigations , 1991 .

[17]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Strategies for increasing fixation probabilities of recessive mutations , 1991 .

[18]  D. Mccauley Genetic consequences of local population extinction and recolonization. , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  N. Barton,et al.  THE PROBABILITY OF FIXATION OF A NEW KARYOTYPE IN A CONTINUOUS POPULATION , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  M. Slatkin Inbreeding coefficients and coalescence times. , 1991, Genetical research.

[21]  H. Gregorius,et al.  On the concept of effective number. , 1991, Theoretical population biology.

[22]  M. Whitlock TEMPORAL FLUCTUATIONS IN DEMOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS AND THE GENETIC VARIANCE AMONG POPULATIONS , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  O. Rhodes,et al.  Effective sizes for subdivided populations. , 1993, Genetics.

[24]  Nicholas H. Barton,et al.  The probability of fixation of a favoured allele in a subdivided population , 1993 .

[25]  Nicholas H. Barton,et al.  Adaptation and the shifting balance , 1993 .

[26]  S. Ellner,et al.  Chaos in Ecology: Is Mother Nature a Strange Attractor?* , 1993 .

[27]  Armando Caballero,et al.  Developments in the prediction of effective population size , 1994, Heredity.

[28]  B. Charlesworth The effect of background selection against deleterious mutations on weakly selected, linked variants. , 1994, Genetical research.

[29]  A. Lloyd THE COUPLED LOGISTIC MAP : A SIMPLE MODEL FOR THE EFFECTS OF SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY ON POPULATION DYNAMICS , 1995 .

[30]  A. Kondrashov Contamination of the genome by very slightly deleterious mutations: why have we not died 100 times over? , 1995, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  R. Frankham Inbreeding and Extinction: A Threshold Effect , 1995 .

[32]  A. Caballero,et al.  Effective size of populations under selection. , 1995, Genetics.

[33]  M. Lynch,et al.  Mutation Accumulation and the Extinction of Small Populations , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[34]  M. Whitlock,et al.  The Evolution of Metapopulations , 1997 .