Perceiving slipperiness and grip: A meaningful relationship of the shoe-ground interface.

The present study investigated the relationship between objective measurements of the available (CoFA), the utilized (CoFU) coefficient of friction and subjective perception of grip or slipperiness. It was hypothesized that significant correlations exist between the perception of grip or slip and the CoF during sports movement and that a minimum CoF was needed to ensure an optimal grip/slipperiness perception. Eighteen healthy active females performed forward and backward cutting tasks onto a forceplate. Six shoes and two floors were used to induce different grip conditions. Subjective ratings and CoFU were assessed for each shoe-floor combination, and mechanical CoFA was also measured in a specific test bed. Significant relationships (p<0.001) were found between grip, slipperiness ratings or CoFA with the CoFU (r=0.98, r=-0.97, r=0.88, respectively). Individual sensory thresholds of the minimum required CoFU were also determined using probit models between the CoFU and the grip acceptability. The mean threshold defined in the present study was 0.70±0.11. This meant that below this threshold, the grip perception was not acceptable, whereas above this threshold, the grip was felt good enough to perform the task. In conclusion, strong relationships between subjective perceptions and objective measurements of friction were found in sports-like movements. Moreover, a minimum friction requirement was defined for indoor dry shoe-floor conditions. The present study gives new insights of the shoe-floor interaction and outlines friction requirements for the manufacturers of sports floor or footwear.

[1]  Thomas P Andriacchi,et al.  Shoe-Surface Friction Influences Movement Strategies during a Sidestep Cutting Task , 2010, The American journal of sports medicine.

[2]  Yueng-Hsiang Huang,et al.  Assessing floor slipperiness in fast-food restaurants in Taiwan using objective and subjective measures. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.

[3]  R E Schlegel,et al.  Coefficient of Friction and Subjective Assessment of Slippery Work Surfaces , 1992, Human factors.

[4]  M J Lake,et al.  Determining the protective function of sports footwear , 2000, Ergonomics.

[5]  Nils Guéguen,et al.  Static vs. dynamic friction coefficients, which one to use in sports footwear research? , 2015 .

[6]  R Grönqvist,et al.  Human-centred approaches in slipperiness measurement , 2001, Ergonomics.

[7]  Weigang Zhang,et al.  Roughness and slipperiness of floor surface: Tactile sensation and perception , 2011 .

[8]  Jay T. Worobets,et al.  Early Heelstrike Kinetics Are Indicative of Slip Potential During Walking Over a Contaminated Surface , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Kai Way Li,et al.  Perceived floor slipperiness and floor roughness in a gait experiment. , 2015, Work.

[10]  D Gordon E Robertson,et al.  Design and responses of Butterworth and critically damped digital filters. , 2003, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[11]  Thomas L. Milani,et al.  Actual and perceived running performance in soccer shoes: A series of eight studies , 2009 .

[12]  S. McKee,et al.  Statistical properties of forced-choice psychometric functions: Implications of probit analysis , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  T. Lockhart,et al.  Required coefficient of friction during turning at self-selected slow, normal, and fast walking speeds. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  Kai Way Li,et al.  The effect of shoe soling tread groove width on the coefficient of friction with different sole materials, floors, and contaminants. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.

[15]  Simon Matz,et al.  Assessment of shoe-floor slipperiness with respect to contact-time-related variation in friction during heel strike , 2002 .

[16]  Wen-Ruey Chang,et al.  Floor slipperiness measurement: friction coefficient, roughness of floors, and subjective perception under spillage conditions , 2004 .

[17]  Christopher M Powers,et al.  Increased shoe sole hardness results in compensatory changes in the utilized coefficient of friction during walking. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[18]  J. Burnfield,et al.  Prediction of slips: an evaluation of utilized coefficient of friction and available slip resistance , 2006, Ergonomics.

[19]  P. Succop,et al.  Effect of workers' shoe wear on objective and subjective assessment of slipperiness. , 1996, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[20]  M S Redfern,et al.  Predicting slips and falls considering required and available friction. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[21]  D. Stefanyshyn,et al.  The effect of translational and rotational traction on lower extremity joint loading , 2016, Journal of sports sciences.

[22]  Kurt E. Beschorner,et al.  Effects of slip testing parameters on measured coefficient of friction. , 2007, Applied ergonomics.

[23]  R Grönqvist,et al.  Slipperiness of the shoe-floor interface: comparison of objective and subjective assessments. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[24]  Matt Carré,et al.  The science and engineering of sport surfaces , 2015 .

[25]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  Mark G Blanchette,et al.  The influence of heel height on utilized coefficient of friction during walking. , 2011, Gait & posture.

[27]  Ravindra S. Goonetilleke,et al.  The science of footwear , 2012 .

[28]  S. Dixon,et al.  The influence of tennis court surfaces on player perceptions and biomechanical response , 2016, Journal of sports sciences.

[29]  Jian Bi,et al.  SENSORY THRESHOLDS: CONCEPTS AND METHODS , 1998 .