The Impact of Pollution Control on Technology and Efficiency: A Stochastic Distance Function Approach

Empirical studies using econometric models to analyse the effects of environmental regulations on production technology and the cost-effectiveness of the regulatory system have been relatively scarce. In contrast, there is extensive theoretical literature on comparing the performance of different pollution control instruments (for example, Baumol and Oates, 1988; Tietenberg 1990). In general, the debate has remained largely on the theoretical level because of the lack of empirical research. However, in the past decade or so there have been a number of empirical studies which have attempted to analyse the response of firms to environmental regulations (for example, Barbera and McConnell 1990; Conrad and Morrison 1989; Fare et al., 1986, 1989a, 1989b, 1993; Gollop and Roberts 1983; Jorgenson and Wilcoxen, 1990; Pittman, 1981, 1983; Sims, 1979). These studies have examined various effects of pollution-control policy, including the direct impact of regulation on firms because of the diversion of resources into abatement capital and an indirect effect because of changes in the production process and usage of inputs. On the other hand, some of these studies have also analysed the cost-effectiveness of the regulatory system itself (Pittman, 1981; Fare et al., 1993). For the most part, these studies are based on industry-level data. This is an important shortcoming, as regulations are usually set at the plant level.

[1]  A. Barbera,et al.  The impact of environmental regulations on industry productivity: Direct and indirect effects , 1990 .

[2]  C.A.K. Lovell,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach , 1989 .

[3]  C. Lovell,et al.  RESOURCES AND FUNCTIONINGS: A NEW VIEW OF INEQUALITY IN AUSTRALIA , 1994 .

[4]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[5]  Thomas R. Gulledge,et al.  International Applications of Productivity and Efficiency Analysis , 1992 .

[6]  Lauri Hetemäki Factor substitution in the Finnish pulp and paper industry. , 1990 .

[7]  William Sims The Response of Firms to Pollution Charges , 1979 .

[8]  Ernst R. Berndt,et al.  The Practice of Econometrics , 1991 .

[9]  Stephen Nickell,et al.  Productivity growth in U.K. companies, 1975-1986 , 1992 .

[10]  W. Greene Maximum likelihood estimation of econometric frontier functions , 1980 .

[11]  Cheng Hsiao,et al.  Analysis of Panel Data , 1987 .

[12]  R. Pittman Issue in pollution control: interplant cost differences and economies of scale. , 1981 .

[13]  D. Aigner,et al.  P. Schmidt, 1977,?Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models,? , 1977 .

[14]  John G. Myers,et al.  Energy and Pollution Effects on Productivity: A Putty-Clay Approach , 1980 .

[15]  C. Lovell,et al.  On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model , 1982 .

[16]  Shawna Grosskopf,et al.  Local Public Sector Bureaucrats and Their Input Choices , 1993 .

[17]  Mark J. Roberts,et al.  Environmental Regulations and Productivity Growth: The Case of Fossil-fueled Electric Power Generation , 1983, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  J. Gullichsen Chemical pulping technology and contemporary environmental issues , 1990 .

[19]  G. Battese,et al.  Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data , 1988 .

[20]  Wallace E. Oates,et al.  The theory of environmental policy , 1976 .

[21]  Russell Pittman,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons with Undesirable Outputs , 1983 .

[22]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Effects on relative efficiency in electric power generation due to environmental controls , 1986 .

[23]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Fundamentals of production theory , 1988 .

[24]  Dale W. Jorgenson,et al.  Environmental Regulation and U.S. Economic Growth , 1990 .

[25]  Klaus Conrad,et al.  The Impact of Pollution Abatement Investment on Productivity Change: Anempirical Comparison of the U.S., Germany, and Canada , 1985 .

[26]  William J. Baumol,et al.  The theory of environmental policy: Contents , 1988 .

[27]  R. Stevenson Likelihood functions for generalized stochastic frontier estimation , 1980 .

[28]  S. E. Jacobsen,et al.  On Shephard's duality theorem , 1972 .

[29]  W. Baumol,et al.  The theory of environmental policy: On the theory of externalities , 1988 .

[30]  T. Tietenberg Economic Instruments for Environmental Regulation , 1990 .