An observational test of the critical earthquake concept

We test the concept that seismicity prior to a large earthquake can be understood in terms of the statistical physics of a critical phase transition. In this model, the cumulative seismic strain release increases as a power law time to failure before the final event. Furthermore, the region of correlated seismicity predicted by this model is much greater than would be predicted from simple elastodynamic interactions. We present a systematic procedure to test for the accelerating seismicity predicted by the critical point model and to identify the region approaching criticality, based on a comparison between the observed cumulative energy (Benioff strain) release and the power law behavior predicted by theory. This method is used to find the critical region before all earthquakes along the San Andreas system since 1950 with M≥6.5. The statistical significance of our results is assessed by performing the same procedure on a large number of randomly generated synthetic catalogs. The null hypothesis, that the observed acceleration in all these earthquakes could result from spurious patterns generated by our procedure in purely random catalogs, is rejected with 99.5% confidence. An empirical relation between the logarithm of the critical region radius (R) and the magnitude of the final event (M) is found, such that log R∝0.5M, suggesting that the largest probable event in a given region scales with the size of the regional fault network.

[1]  Sornette,et al.  Statistical model of earthquake foreshocks. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[2]  Lucile M. Jones,et al.  Some characteristics of foreshocks and their possible relationship to earthquake prediction , 1979 .

[3]  J. Rundle,et al.  The growth of geological structures by repeated earthquakes, 1, conceptual framework , 1988 .

[4]  Didier Sornette,et al.  The dynamical thermal fuse model , 1992 .

[5]  A. Provost,et al.  Scaling rules in rock fracture and possible implications for earthquake prediction , 1982, Nature.

[6]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Self-Organized Criticality and Earthquakes , 1989 .

[7]  Sornette,et al.  Experimental Realization of Critical Thermal Fuse Rupture. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[8]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Forecasting Southern California Earthquakes , 1982, Science.

[9]  J. Rundle.  A physical model for earthquakes: 2. Application to southern California , 1988 .

[10]  D. Sornette,et al.  Earthquake rupture as a critical point: consequences for telluric precursors , 1990 .

[11]  K. Wilson.  Problems in Physics with many Scales of Length , 1979 .

[12]  David J. Varnes,et al.  Predictive modeling of the seismic cycle of the Greater San Francisco Bay Region , 1993 .

[13]  D. Sornette,et al.  Rank‐ordering statistics of extreme events: Application to the distribution of large earthquakes , 1995, cond-mat/9510035.

[14]  J. Spencer.  Ramsey Theory , 1990 .

[15]  P. Bak,et al.  Earthquakes as a self‐organized critical phenomenon , 1989 .

[16]  Frank Press,et al.  Pattern recognition applied to earthquake epicenters in California , 1976 .

[17]  T. Hirata.  Fractal dimension of fault systems in Japan: Fractal structure in rock fracture geometry at various scales , 1989 .

[18]  Allan G. Lindh.  The seismic cycle pursued , 1990, Nature.

[19]  E. Hauksson,et al.  The seismic cycle in southern California: Precursor or response? , 1997 .

[20]  C. R. Allen,et al.  Intermediate-term prediction of occurrence times of strong earthquakes , 1988, Nature.

[21]  L. Sykes,et al.  Frequency of occurrence of moderate to great earthquakes in intracontinental regions: Implications for changes in stress, earthquake prediction, and hazards assessments , 1997 .

[22]  Keisuke Ito,et al.  Earthquakes as self-organized critical phenomena , 1990 .

[23]  John B. Rundle,et al.  Derivation of the complete Gutenberg‐Richter magnitude‐frequency relation using the principle of scale invariance , 1989 .

[24]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Discrete scale invariance, complex fractal dimensions, and log‐periodic fluctuations in seismicity , 1996 .

[25]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Theoretical Basis of Some Empirical Relations in Seismology by Hiroo Kanamori And , 1975 .

[26]  D. Varnes,et al.  The cyclic and fractal seismic series preceding an mb 4.8 earthquake on 1980 February 14 near the Virgin Islands , 1996 .

[27]  D. J. Andrews,et al.  From antimoment to moment: Plane-strain models of earthquakes that stop , 1975, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[28]  Geoffrey C. P. King,et al.  Speculations on the geometry of the initiation and termination processes of earthquake rupture and its relation to morphology and geological structure , 1986 .

[29]  H. Herrmann,et al.  Statistical models for the fracture of disordered media. North‐Holland, 1990, 353 p., ISBN 0444 88551x (hardbound) US $ 92.25, 0444 885501 (paperback) US $ 41.00 , 1990 .

[30]  Vladimir Kossobokov,et al.  Premonitory activation of earthquake flow: algorithm M8 , 1990 .

[31]  I. P. Dobrovolsky,et al.  Estimation of the size of earthquake preparation zones , 1979 .

[32]  D. Sornette,et al.  Tricritical Behavior in Rupture Induced by Disorder , 1997 .

[33]  C. H. Scholz,et al.  Earthquakes and Faulting: Self-Organized Critical Phenomena with a Characteristic Dimension , 1991 .

[34]  T. Levshina,et al.  Increased long‐range intermediate‐magnitude earthquake activity prior to strong earthquakes in California , 1996 .

[35]  D. Sornette,et al.  Hierarchical geometry of faulting , 1996 .

[36]  R. Simpson,et al.  In the shadow of 1857‐the effect of the Great Ft. Tejon Earthquake on subsequent earthquakes in southern California , 1996 .

[37]  Lucile M. Jones,et al.  Foreshocks, aftershocks, and earthquake probabilities: Accounting for the landers earthquake , 1994 .

[38]  John B. Rundle,et al.  A physical model for earthquakes: 3. Thermodynamical approach and its relation to nonclassical theories of nucleation , 1989 .

[39]  Sara A. Solla,et al.  A renormalization group approach to the stick-slip behavior of faults , 1985 .

[40]  Y. Kagan,et al.  Earthquakes Cannot Be Predicted , 1997, Science.

[41]  D. C. Sherrington,et al.  Spontaneous formation of space-time structures and criticality , 1991 .

[42]  John B. Rundle,et al.  A physical model for earthquakes: 1. Fluctuations and interactions , 1988 .

[43]  D. Sornette,et al.  Precursors, aftershocks, criticality and self-organized criticality , 1998 .

[44]  M. Sahimi,et al.  Fractal analysis of three‐dimensional spatial distributions of earthquakes with a percolation interpretation , 1995 .

[45]  Tamaz Chelidze,et al.  Percolation and fracture , 1982 .

[46]  Sornette,et al.  Dynamics and memory effects in rupture of thermal fuse networks. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[47]  D. Sornette,et al.  Testing self‐organized criticality by induced seismicity , 1998, cond-mat/9810190.

[48]  Stuart P. Nishenko,et al.  Seismicity trends and potential for large earthquakes in the Alaska-Aleutian region , 1994 .

[49]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Complex Critical Exponents from Renormalization Group Theory of Earthquakes: Implications for Earthquake Predictions , 1995 .

[50]  D. Sornette,et al.  Renormalization group theory of earthquakes , 1996 .

[51]  Ian Main,et al.  Long odds on prediction , 1997, Nature.

[52]  D. L. Turcotte,et al.  A fractal model for crustal deformation , 1986 .

[53]  D. Sornette.  Self-Organized Criticality in Plate Tectonics , 1991 .

[54]  Claude J. Allègre,et al.  Introduction of scaling techniques in brittle fracture of rocks , 1994 .

[55]  Lynn R. Sykes,et al.  Seismic activity on neighbouring faults as a long-term precursor to large earthquakes in the San Francisco Bay area , 1990, Nature.