The role of habitat quality in fragmented landscapes: a conceptual overview and prospectus for future research

There is increasing empirical evidence that the quality of habitat patches (determined by either habitat degradation or natural heterogeneity in the quality of habitat) plays an important role in determining species distribution patterns and in regulating spatial dynamics in fragmented landscapes. However, to date, most of the debate has focused on whether or not to include habitat variables in fragmentation studies, and we still lack general conclusions as well as standard and robust research approaches. In this paper we show how a weak conceptualization of “patch quality” and the inappropriate choice of target surrogate variables (e.g., density is often used as an indicator of patch quality) have mainly produced case-specific results, rather than general conclusions. We then identify weaknesses in the inclusion of habitat quality measurements within fragmentation studies. In particular, we focus on: (1) the lack of appropriate experimental design, outlining how few studies have actually included a gradient of habitat quality in their sample; (2) the lack of fundamental information provided (e.g., lack of standard outputs), which in turn hampers the possibility of carrying out meta-analyses. We finally synthesize available knowledge from empirical studies and highlight the different conceptual frameworks needed for patch occupancy versus patch use studies.

[1]  Marianne S. Fred,et al.  Influence of Habitat Quality and Patch Size on Occupancy and Persistence in two Populations of the Apollo Butterfly (Parnassius apollo) , 2003, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[2]  Kevin R. Crooks,et al.  Connectivity Conservation: Connectivity conservation: maintaining connections for nature , 2006 .

[3]  John M Drake,et al.  Effects of habitat quality and size on extinction in experimental populations , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Oscar E. Gaggiotti,et al.  Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations , 2004 .

[5]  Matthew D. Johnson,et al.  MEASURING HABITAT QUALITY: A REVIEW , 2007 .

[6]  L. Maiorano,et al.  Ecological Networks as Conceptual Frameworks or Operational Tools in Conservation , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[7]  C. Thomas,et al.  The spatial structure of populations , 1999 .

[8]  D. Marsh,et al.  Metapopulation Dynamics and Amphibian Conservation , 2001 .

[9]  A. Hirzel,et al.  Habitat-quality effects on metapopulation dynamics in greater white-toothed shrews, Crocidura russula. , 2008, Ecology.

[10]  Michael Drielsma,et al.  Rapid evaluation of metapopulation persistence in highly variegated landscapes. , 2009 .

[11]  L. Fahrig Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity , 2003 .

[12]  Paul Opdam,et al.  European Nuthatch Metapopulations in a Fragmented Agricultural Landscape , 1991 .

[13]  B. Schröder,et al.  Habitat quality matters for the distribution of an endangered leaf beetle and its egg parasitoid in a fragmented landscape , 2009, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[14]  Anthony Lehmann,et al.  Multi-scale effect of landscape processes and habitat quality on newt abundance: Implications for conservation , 2006 .

[15]  T. O. Crist,et al.  Contrasting effects of habitat quantity and quality on moth communities in fragmented landscapes , 2004 .

[16]  J. Nichols,et al.  The Role of Local Populations within a Landscape Context: Defining and Classifying Sources and Sinks , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[17]  Joern Fischer,et al.  Tackling the habitat fragmentation panchreston. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  Roland P. Carpenter,et al.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis , 2000 .

[19]  B. Goodger,et al.  The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  Interactions between dispersal, competition, and landscape heterogeneity , 2007 .

[21]  T. Kawecki Ecological and Evolutionary Consequences of Source-Sink Population Dynamics , 2004 .

[22]  R. Grundel,et al.  Resource availability, matrix quality, microclimate, and spatial pattern as predictors of patch use by the Karner blue butterfly , 2007 .

[23]  L. Boitani,et al.  Testing for the relative contribution of patch neighborhood, patch internal structure, and presence of predators and competitor species in determining distribution patterns of rodents in a fragmented landscape , 2009 .

[24]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .

[25]  Sonia G. Rabasa,et al.  Metapopulation structure and habitat quality in modelling dispersal in the butterfly Iolana iolas , 2007 .

[26]  Joseph E. Duchamp,et al.  The roles of landscape context, niche breadth, and range boundaries in predicting species responses to habitat alteration , 2006 .

[27]  Miska Luoto,et al.  An Empirical Test of a Diffusion Model: Predicting Clouded Apollo Movements in a Novel Environment , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[28]  B. Schmid,et al.  Conservation of arthropod diversity in montane wetlands: effect of altitude, habitat quality and habitat fragmentation on butterflies and grasshoppers , 1999 .

[29]  L. Maiorano,et al.  Assessing habitat quality for conservation using an integrated occurrence-mortality model , 2009 .

[30]  Emilio M. Bruna,et al.  Habitat fragmentation and large‐scale conservation: what do we know for sure? , 1999 .

[31]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity Conservation: Landscape connectivity: a return to the basics , 2006 .

[32]  Mikko Kuussaari,et al.  Relative contributions of local and regional factors to species richness and total density of butterflies and moths in semi-natural grasslands , 2009, Oecologia.

[33]  P. Dinnétz,et al.  Food plant density, patch isolation and vegetation height determine occurrence in a Swedish metapopulation of the marsh fritillary Euphydryas aurinia (Rottemburg, 1775) (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) , 2007, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[34]  D. Hik,et al.  Influence of habitat quality, patch size and connectivity on colonization and extinction dynamics of collared pikas Ochotona collaris , 2004 .

[35]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[36]  Lawrence B. Slobodkin,et al.  A Critique for Ecology , 1991 .

[37]  Annika M. Felton,et al.  Orangutan population density, forest structure and fruit availability in hand-logged and unlogged peat swamp forests in West Kalimantan, Indonesia , 2003 .

[38]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Metapopulation responses to patch connectivity and quality are masked by successional habitat dynamics. , 2009, Ecology.

[39]  I. Hanski,et al.  Habitat Deterioration, Habitat Destruction, and Metapopulation Persistence in a Heterogenous Landscape , 1997, Theoretical population biology.

[40]  G. Holland,et al.  Occurrence of small mammals in a fragmented landscape: the role of vegetation heterogeneity , 2007 .

[41]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis , 2007 .

[42]  S. Mandujano,et al.  Forest Fragmentation Modifies Habitat Quality for Alouatta palliata , 2006, International Journal of Primatology.

[43]  J. Silk Maternal Investment in Captive Bonnet Macaques (Macaca radiata) , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[44]  Karen V. Root,et al.  EVALUATING THE EFFECTS OF HABITAT QUALITY, CONNECTIVITY, AND CATASTROPHES ON A THREATENED SPECIES , 1998 .

[45]  S. Matter,et al.  Interactions between habitat quality and connectivity affect immigration but not abundance or population growth of the butterfly, Parnassius smintheus. , 2009 .

[46]  E. Virgós Role of isolation and habitat quality in shaping species abundance: a test with badgers (Meles meles L.) in a gradient of forest fragmentation , 2001 .

[47]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Finding habitat patches and directional connectivity , 2003 .

[48]  Michael L. Morrison,et al.  The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology , 1997 .

[49]  R. Schooley,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity in Habitat Quality and Cross-Scale Interactions in Metapopulations , 2007, Ecosystems.

[50]  R. Manson,et al.  Patch‐ and landscape‐scale effects on howler monkey distribution and abundance in rainforest fragments , 2007 .

[51]  R. Dennis,et al.  Patch occupancy in Coenonympha tullia (Muller, 1764) (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae): habitat quality matters as much as patch size and isolation , 1997, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[52]  R. Hobbs,et al.  A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[53]  J. Tellería,et al.  Habitat quality predicts the distribution of a lizard in fragmented woodlands better than habitat fragmentation , 2008 .

[54]  O. Ovaskainen,et al.  Modelling dispersal with diffusion and habitat selection: Analytical results for highly fragmented landscapes , 2009 .

[55]  C. Gascon,et al.  Lessons from Fragmentation Research: Improving Management and Policy Guidelines for Biodiversity Conservation , 2005 .

[56]  B. V. Horne,et al.  DENSITY AS A MISLEADING INDICATOR OF HABITAT QUALITY , 1983 .

[57]  I. Newton,et al.  Occupancy as a measure of territory quality , 2003 .

[58]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  An experimental study of migration in the Glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia , 1996 .

[59]  Sonia G. Rabasa,et al.  Relative importance of host plant patch geometry and habitat quality on the patterns of occupancy, extinction and density of the monophagous butterfly Iolana iolas , 2008, Oecologia.

[60]  L. Boitani,et al.  Interaction of food resources and landscape structure in determining the probability of patch use by carnivores in fragmented landscapes , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[61]  E. Fleishman,et al.  Assessing the Roles of Patch Quality, Area, and Isolation in Predicting Metapopulation Dynamics , 2002 .

[62]  Zhilan Feng,et al.  Merging Spatial and Temporal Structure within a Metapopulation Model , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[63]  Huw Lloyd,et al.  Influence of within‐patch habitat quality on high‐Andean Polylepis bird abundance , 2008 .

[64]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  Climate change, connectivity and conservation decision making: back to basics , 2009 .

[65]  H. Jacquemyn,et al.  Conservation of remnant populations of Colchicum autumnale - the relative importance of local habitat quality and habitat fragmentation. , 2009 .

[66]  G. Daily,et al.  TROPICAL COUNTRYSIDE BIRD ASSEMBLAGES: RICHNESS, COMPOSITION, AND FORAGING DIFFER BY LANDSCAPE CONTEXT , 2003 .

[67]  Piero Visconti,et al.  Using connectivity metrics in conservation planning – when does habitat quality matter? , 2009 .

[68]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  A comparison of constructed and natural habitat for frog conservation in an Australian agricultural landscape , 2004 .

[69]  L. Wauters,et al.  Woodland fragmentation affects space use of Eurasian red squirrels , 2009 .

[70]  O. Kindvall Habitat Heterogeneity and Survival in a Bush Cricket Metapopulation , 1996 .

[71]  J. Reid Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2003 .

[72]  T. Tscharntke,et al.  Landscape occupancy and local population size depends on host plant distribution in the butterfly Cupido minimus , 2004 .

[73]  Doug P. Armstrong,et al.  Integrating the Metapopulation and Habitat Paradigms for Understanding Broad‐Scale Declines of Species , 2005 .

[74]  T. Tscharntke,et al.  Relative importance of resource quantity, isolation and habitat quality for landscape distribution of a monophagous butterfly , 2005 .

[75]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Appreciating Ecological Complexity: Habitat Contours as a Conceptual Landscape Model , 2004 .

[76]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS: EFFECTS OF HABITAT QUALITY AND LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE , 1998 .

[77]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[78]  Flemming Skov,et al.  Handbook of Biodiversity Methods: Survey, Evaluation and Monitoring , 2006 .

[79]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  The Quantitative Incidence Function Model and Persistence of an Endangered Butterfly Metapopulation , 1996 .