The most significant copyright development of the twenty first century has not arisen through any law enacted by Congress or opinion rendered by the Supreme Court. Instead, it has come from the unorganized, informal practices of various, unrelated users of copyrighted works, many of whom probably know next to nothing about copyright law. In order to comprehend this paradox, one must look at what is popularly known as "Web 2.0," and the growth of user-generated content in blogs, wikis, podcasts, "mashup" videos, and social networking sites like Facebook and MySpace. Although users often create new works of their own, sometimes the works are "remixed" with copyrighted content of others. The growth of user-generated content challenges the conventional understandings of copyright law under which copyrights are understood largely as static and fixed from the top down. Under this view, copyright holders are at the center of the copyright universe and exercise considerable control over their exclusive rights. Obtaining prior authorization from the copyright holder is typically assumed to be necessary for others legally to re-use the copyrighted work, apart from a fair or other permitted use (which often is not easy to determine in advance). This Article challenges the conventional account of copyright law, particularly as applied to Web 2.0. The formalist understanding of copyright law ignores reality. The Copyright Act is riddled with gray areas and gaps, many of which persist over time because so few copyright cases are ever filed and the majority of those filed are not resolved through a judgment. My core thesis is that informal copyright practices - i.e., practices that are not authorized by formal copyright licenses, but whose legality falls within a gray area of copyright law - effectively serve as important gap-fillers in our copyright system. The informal practices related to user-generated content provide a compelling example of this phenomenon. These practices make manifest three significant features of our copyright system that have escaped the attention of legal scholars: (i) our copyright system could not function without informal copyright practices; (ii) collectively, users wield far more power in influencing the shape of copyright law than is commonly perceived; and (iii) uncertainty in formal copyright law can lead to the phenomenon of "warming," in which - unlike chilling - users are emboldened to make unauthorized uses of copyrighted works based on seeing what appears to be an increasingly accepted practice. In the Web 2.0 world, warming may serve as a powerful counterforce to the chilling of speech.
[1]
Leanne Stendell.
Fanfic and Fan Fact: How Current Copyright Law Ignores the Reality of Copyright Owner and Consumer Interests in Fan Fiction
,
2005
.
[2]
J. Hughes.
Created Facts and the Flawed Ontology of Copyright Law
,
2007
.
[3]
Joshua L Schwartz.
Thinking outside the Pandora's Box: Why the DMCA is Unconstitutional under Article I §8 of the U.S. Constitution
,
2004
.
[4]
Anupam Chander,et al.
Everyone's a Superhero: A Cultural Theory of 'Mary Sue' Fan Fiction as Fair Use
,
2007
.
[5]
R. Braswell.
Consumer Gripe Sites, Intellectual Property Law, and the Use of Cease-and-Desist Letters to Chill Protected Speech on the Internet.
,
2007
.
[6]
Rebecca Tushnet,et al.
Legal Fictions: Copyright, Fan Fiction, and a New Common Law
,
1997
.
[7]
Amos Tutuola.
My Life in the Bush of Ghosts
,
1954
.
[8]
K. F. レンツ,et al.
the Creative Commons
,
2011
.
[9]
Dan Hunter,et al.
Amateur-to-Amateur
,
2004
.
[10]
Niva Elkin-Koren,et al.
What Contracts Can't Do: The Limits of Private Ordering in Facilitating a Creative Commons
,
2005
.
[11]
M. Garrison.
The Decline of Formal Marriage: Inevitable or Reversible?
,
2008
.
[12]
Derek J. Schaffner.
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act: Overextension of Copyright Protection and the Unintended Chilling Effects on Fair Use, Free Speech, and Innovation
,
2004
.
[13]
J. Chung.
Drawing Idea from Expression: Creating a Legal Space for Culturally Appropriated Literary Characters
,
2008
.