Molecular communication: Uni-cast communication on a microtubule topology

Molecular communication is one method for communication among nano-scale components (artificial or biological) that perform simple computation, sensing, or actuation. Future applications using nano-scale components may require communication mechanisms to coordinate with other components. For example, uni-cast is one primitive communication mechanism for transmission from one sender to one receiver and allows two nano-scale components to coordinate and perform some function. In this paper, we consider designing a molecular communication system that applies a molecular motor transport mechanism existing in biological cells. In molecular motor transport, a sender (nano-scale component) releases information molecules, and molecular motors transport the information molecules along protein filaments to a receiver (nano-scale component) up to hundreds of micrometers away. We consider a plus-centered aster (receiver with multiple protein filaments leading to the receiver) as one possible arrangement for protein filaments. We perform simulations to evaluate the probability of sending an information molecule to the receiver. The simulation results indicate that the proposed uni-cast molecular communication is limited in range (distance between sender and receiver with a reasonable success probability) and that the proposed molecular motor system transports simulated information molecules (100 nm radius spheres) with a greater success probability and than a passive diffusion-only system.

[1]  Arijit Chakravarty,et al.  A mechanistic model for the organization of microtubule asters by motor and non-motor proteins in a mammalian mitotic extract. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[2]  François Nédélec,et al.  Computer simulations reveal motor properties generating stable antiparallel microtubule interactions , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  François Nédélec,et al.  Modelling microtubule patterns , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[4]  Viola Vogel,et al.  Engineered networks of oriented microtubule filaments for directed cargo transport. , 2007, Soft matter.

[5]  S. Leibler,et al.  Self-organization of microtubules and motors , 1997, Nature.

[6]  R. Brent,et al.  Modelling cellular behaviour , 2001, Nature.

[7]  Viola Vogel,et al.  Molecular Shuttles Operating Undercover: A New Photolithographic Approach for the Fabrication of Structured Surfaces Supporting Directed Motility , 2003 .

[8]  T. Head,et al.  Aqueous computing: writing on molecules , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406).

[9]  T. Mitchison Localization of an exchangeable GTP binding site at the plus end of microtubules. , 1993, Science.

[10]  T Kanayama,et al.  Controlling the direction of kinesin-driven microtubule movements along microlithographic tracks. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[11]  Ron Weiss,et al.  Genetic circuit building blocks for cellular computation, communications, and signal processing , 2003, Natural Computing.

[12]  Francis Lin,et al.  Intracellular actin-based transport: how far you go depends on how often you switch. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Peter J. Thomas,et al.  The Diffusion-Limited Biochemical Signal-Relay Channel , 2003, NIPS.

[14]  Tatsuya Suda,et al.  Molecular communication for health care applications , 2006, Fourth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOMW'06).

[15]  M. Roukes Nanoelectromechanical Systems , 2000, cond-mat/0008187.

[16]  Tatsuya Suda,et al.  Exploratory Research on Molecular Communication between Nanomachines , 2005 .

[17]  H R Hoogenboom,et al.  Artificial antibodies and enzymes: mimicking nature and beyond. , 1995, Trends in biotechnology.

[18]  Hiroyasu Itoh,et al.  Rotation of F1-ATPase: how an ATP-driven molecular machine may work. , 2004, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[19]  R. Weiss,et al.  Programmed population control by cell–cell communication and regulated killing , 2004, Nature.

[20]  H. Hotani,et al.  Dynamics of microtubules visualized by darkfield microscopy: treadmilling and dynamic instability. , 1988, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[21]  J. Pelesko,et al.  Modeling MEMS and NEMS , 2002 .

[22]  Tatsuya Suda,et al.  Autonomous loading, transport, and unloading of specified cargoes by using DNA hybridization and biological motor-based motility. , 2008, Small.

[23]  Yale E Goldman,et al.  Kinesin and dynein-dynactin at intersecting microtubules: motor density affects dynein function. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[24]  R. Lipowsky,et al.  Cooperative cargo transport by several molecular motors. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  K Prank,et al.  Coding efficiency and information rates in transmembrane signaling. , 2000, Bio Systems.

[26]  J. Collins,et al.  Programmable cells: interfacing natural and engineered gene networks. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Andrew W. Eckford,et al.  Nanoscale Communication with Brownian Motion , 2007, 2007 41st Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[28]  Sierra K. Hampton,et al.  The Diffusion Mediated Biochemical Signal Relay Channel , 1970 .

[29]  Eric N. Cytrynbaum,et al.  Centering of a radial microtubule array by translocation along microtubules spontaneously nucleated in the cytoplasm , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[30]  T. Pawson,et al.  Protein-protein interactions define specificity in signal transduction. , 2000, Genes & development.

[31]  M. Elowitz,et al.  A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators , 2000, Nature.

[32]  Reinhard Lipowsky,et al.  Transport of Beads by Several Kinesin Motors , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[33]  Wendell A Lim,et al.  Rewiring cell signaling: the logic and plasticity of eukaryotic protein circuitry. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.